Given the following Verilog code, what is the critical path delay assuming each gate has a delay of 1ns?
module logic_path(input wire a, b, c, d, output wire y);
wire w1, w2, w3;
assign w1 = a & b;
assign w2 = w1 | c;
assign w3 = w2 ^ d;
assign y = ~w3;
endmoduleCount the number of gates in the longest path from input to output.
The longest path is a -> w1 (AND) -> w2 (OR) -> w3 (XOR) -> y (NOT), totaling 4 gates, each 1ns delay, so 4 ns total.
Choose the best description of timing closure in the context of digital circuit design.
Think about what 'closure' means in timing context.
Timing closure means the design meets all timing requirements so it can run reliably at the desired clock speed.
Given the following code, which part is most likely causing a timing violation?
module timing_violation(input clk, a, b, output reg y);
reg w1, w2;
always @(posedge clk) begin
w1 <= a & b;
w2 <= w1 | b;
y <= w2 ^ a;
end
endmoduleConsider how data flows between registers within one clock cycle.
Because w2 depends on w1 which is updated on the same clock edge, the logic between registers is combinational and may be too long, causing timing violation.
Select the code snippet that correctly adds a pipeline register stage to break a long combinational path.
Remember that non-blocking assignments (<=) are used in sequential logic triggered by clock edges.
Option A uses non-blocking assignments inside a clocked always block, correctly implementing pipeline registers.
A design has a critical path delay of 12 ns initially. After applying pipelining and logic optimization, the critical path delay is reduced to 4 ns. What is the maximum clock frequency achievable after optimization?
Recall that frequency = 1 / period, and period is the critical path delay.
Maximum frequency = 1 / 4 ns = 250 MHz.
