Bird
Raised Fist0
Typescriptprogramming~10 mins

Exhaustive checking with never in Typescript - Interactive Code Practice

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Practice - 5 Tasks
Answer the questions below
1fill in blank
easy

Complete the code to declare a variable with type never.

Typescript
let errorValue: [1];
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Aunknown
Bany
Cvoid
Dnever
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using 'any' instead of 'never' because 'any' allows any value.
Confusing 'void' with 'never'.
2fill in blank
medium

Complete the function signature to indicate it never returns.

Typescript
function fail(message: string): [1] {
  throw new Error(message);
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Avoid
Bstring
Cnever
Dundefined
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using 'void' which means returns nothing but does return.
Using 'string' or 'undefined' which are incorrect here.
3fill in blank
hard

Fix the error in the exhaustive check function by completing the switch default case.

Typescript
function assertNever(x: never): never {
  throw new Error("Unexpected value: " + [1]);
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
AJSON.stringify(x)
Bx
Ctypeof x
DString(x)
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using typeof x which returns a string describing the type, not the value.
Using JSON.stringify(x) which may cause runtime errors if x is never.
4fill in blank
hard

Fill both blanks to complete the exhaustive check in the switch statement.

Typescript
type Shape = { kind: 'circle', radius: number } | { kind: 'square', size: number };

function area(shape: Shape): number {
  switch (shape.kind) {
    case 'circle':
      return Math.PI * shape.radius * shape.radius;
    case 'square':
      return shape.size * shape.size;
    default:
      return [1](shape); // call assertNever
  }
}

function [2](x: never): never {
  throw new Error('Unexpected shape: ' + x);
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
AassertNever
BcheckNever
DfailNever
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using different names for the function call and declaration.
Not calling the function in the default case.
5fill in blank
hard

Fill all three blanks to complete the exhaustive check with a switch and assertNever function.

Typescript
type Result = { type: 'success', value: number } | { type: 'error', message: string };

function handleResult(result: Result): string {
  switch (result.type) {
    case 'success':
      return `Value is ${result.value}`;
    case 'error':
      return `Error: ${result.message}`;
    default:
      return [1]([2]); // call assertNever with result
  }
}

function [3](x: never): never {
  throw new Error('Unexpected result: ' + x);
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
AassertNever
Bresult
Dfail
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Passing the wrong variable to the function.
Using a different function name in call and declaration.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What is the main purpose of using never in exhaustive checking in TypeScript?
easy
A. To declare a variable that can hold any value
B. To allow any type of value without restrictions
C. To ignore errors during compilation
D. To ensure all possible cases are handled in a switch or conditional

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the role of never in exhaustive checks

    never is used to represent values that should never occur, helping catch unhandled cases.
  2. Step 2: Connect never usage to exhaustive case handling

    By forcing a function to accept never, TypeScript ensures all cases are covered, or else a compile error occurs.
  3. Final Answer:

    To ensure all possible cases are handled in a switch or conditional -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Exhaustive checking = catch all cases [OK]
Hint: Use never to catch missing cases in switch statements [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Thinking never allows any value
  • Using never to ignore errors
  • Confusing never with unknown type
2. Which of the following is the correct syntax for a helper function that uses never to enforce exhaustive checking?
easy
A. function assertNever(x: never): never { throw new Error('Unexpected value: ' + x); }
B. function assertNever(x: any): void { console.log(x); }
C. function assertNever(x: unknown): never { return x; }
D. function assertNever(x: never): void { return; }

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify correct parameter and return types

    The helper function must accept a parameter of type never and return never because it throws an error.
  2. Step 2: Check function body matches expected behavior

    The function throws an error with the unexpected value, which is the standard pattern for exhaustive checks.
  3. Final Answer:

    function assertNever(x: never): never { throw new Error('Unexpected value: ' + x); } -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Helper function with never param and throw = correct [OK]
Hint: Helper must take never and throw error to enforce checks [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using any or unknown instead of never
  • Not throwing an error inside the function
  • Returning void instead of never
3. What will be the output of this TypeScript code?
type Shape = 'circle' | 'square';
function area(shape: Shape) {
  switch (shape) {
    case 'circle':
      return 3.14 * 2 * 2;
    // Missing case for 'square'
    default:
      return assertNever(shape);
  }
}

function assertNever(x: never): never {
  throw new Error('Unexpected shape: ' + x);
}

console.log(area('square'));
medium
A. Returns 12.56
B. Throws Error: Unexpected shape: square
C. Returns undefined
D. Compilation error due to missing case

Solution

  1. Step 1: Analyze switch cases and input

    The function handles 'circle' but not 'square', so at runtime, calling area('square') hits the default case.
  2. Step 2: Understand assertNever behavior at runtime

    The assertNever function throws an error with the unexpected shape, so the program throws a runtime error.
  3. Final Answer:

    Throws Error: Unexpected shape: square -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Missing case causes runtime error when called [OK]
Hint: Missing case triggers runtime error when called [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Assuming missing case returns undefined
  • Thinking it returns a number for all inputs
  • Expecting compile error instead of runtime error
4. Identify the error in this TypeScript code using exhaustive checking:
type Direction = 'up' | 'down' | 'left';
function move(dir: Direction) {
  switch (dir) {
    case 'up':
      return 'Moving up';
    case 'down':
      return 'Moving down';
    default:
      return assertNever(dir);
  }
}

function assertNever(x: never): never {
  throw new Error('Unexpected direction: ' + x);
}
medium
A. Missing case for 'left' in switch statement
B. assertNever function has wrong parameter type
C. Switch statement should not have a default case
D. Function move should return void instead of string

Solution

  1. Step 1: Check all union cases in switch

    The type Direction has 'up', 'down', and 'left', but 'left' is missing in the switch.
  2. Step 2: Understand impact of missing case with assertNever

    Missing 'left' causes default to call assertNever with a string, which is not never, causing a compile error.
  3. Final Answer:

    Missing case for 'left' in switch statement -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    All union cases must be handled [OK]
Hint: Check all union cases explicitly to avoid errors [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Ignoring missing union cases
  • Thinking default case covers all safely
  • Wrong assertNever parameter type
5. Given this code, how can you modify it to ensure exhaustive checking for all Status values?
type Status = 'success' | 'error' | 'loading';

function handleStatus(status: Status) {
  switch (status) {
    case 'success':
      return 'Done';
    case 'error':
      return 'Failed';
    // Missing 'loading' case
    default:
      return assertNever(status);
  }
}

function assertNever(x: never): never {
  throw new Error('Unexpected status: ' + x);
}
hard
A. Change the type Status to include only 'success' and 'error'
B. Remove the default case and rely on TypeScript errors
C. Add a case for 'loading' in the switch statement
D. Change assertNever parameter type to any

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify missing union case in switch

    The 'loading' case is missing, so the switch is not exhaustive.
  2. Step 2: Add missing case to ensure all Status values are handled

    Adding case 'loading': with appropriate return ensures exhaustive checking and no runtime errors.
  3. Final Answer:

    Add a case for 'loading' in the switch statement -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    All union members must have cases [OK]
Hint: Add missing union cases to switch for full coverage [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Removing default case without adding missing cases
  • Changing type to avoid handling all cases
  • Using any instead of never in assertNever
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard