Abstract classes in Typescript

Introduction

Abstract classes help you create a base blueprint for other classes. They let you define common features while forcing specific parts to be made by child classes.

When you want to share common code between related classes but keep some parts open for each class to decide.

When you want to make sure certain methods are always created in child classes.

When you want to prevent creating objects directly from a base class that is incomplete.

When designing a system with different types of similar things that share some behavior.

When you want to organize code clearly by separating shared and unique parts.

Syntax

Typescript

abstract class Animal {
  abstract makeSound(): void;

  move(): void {
    console.log('Moving around');
  }
}

class Dog extends Animal {
  makeSound(): void {
    console.log('Bark');
  }
}

An abstract class cannot be instantiated directly.

Abstract methods have no body and must be implemented by subclasses.

Examples

Basic example where the abstract method startEngine must be defined in Car.

Typescript

abstract class Vehicle {
  abstract startEngine(): void;
}

class Car extends Vehicle {
  startEngine(): void {
    console.log('Car engine started');
  }
}

Abstract class Shape forces area method. Circle provides its own calculation.

Typescript

abstract class Shape {
  abstract area(): number;
}

class Circle extends Shape {
  radius: number;
  constructor(radius: number) {
    super();
    this.radius = radius;
  }
  area(): number {
    return Math.PI * this.radius * this.radius;
  }
}

You cannot create an object from an abstract class directly.

Typescript

abstract class Employee {
  abstract getSalary(): number;
}

// Error: Cannot create instance of abstract class
// const emp = new Employee();

Sample Program

This program shows an abstract class Animal with an abstract method makeSound. Two classes Dog and Cat implement this method. We create objects of Dog and Cat and call their methods.

Typescript

abstract class Animal {
  abstract makeSound(): void;

  move(): void {
    console.log('Moving around');
  }
}

class Dog extends Animal {
  makeSound(): void {
    console.log('Bark');
  }
}

class Cat extends Animal {
  makeSound(): void {
    console.log('Meow');
  }
}

const dog = new Dog();
dog.move();
dog.makeSound();

const cat = new Cat();
cat.move();
cat.makeSound();

Important Notes

Time complexity depends on the methods you implement, not on abstract classes themselves.

Abstract classes help organize code and enforce rules for subclasses.

Common mistake: Trying to create an instance of an abstract class directly causes an error.

Use abstract classes when you want to share code and force certain methods to be implemented. Use interfaces if you only want to enforce method signatures without code.

Summary

Abstract classes provide a base with some shared code and some methods to be defined by subclasses.

You cannot create objects from abstract classes directly.

They help organize related classes and enforce important methods.

Practice

1. What is true about an abstract class in TypeScript?

easy

A. Abstract classes are the same as interfaces.

B. Abstract classes cannot have any methods implemented.

C. You cannot create an instance of an abstract class directly.

D. You must use the new keyword to instantiate an abstract class.

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand abstract class instantiation rules

   Abstract classes cannot be instantiated directly, so you cannot create objects from them using new.

2. Step 2: Compare other options

   Abstract classes can have implemented methods, are different from interfaces, and cannot be instantiated with new.

3. Final Answer:

   You cannot create an instance of an abstract class directly. -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Abstract class instantiation = not allowed [OK]

Hint: Remember: abstract classes can't be directly instantiated [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Thinking abstract classes are interfaces
• Assuming abstract classes can't have implemented methods
• Trying to instantiate abstract classes directly

2. Which of the following is the correct syntax to declare an abstract class in TypeScript?

easy

A. abstract class Vehicle {}

B. class abstract Vehicle {}

C. abstract Vehicle class {}

D. class Vehicle abstract {}

Solution

1. Step 1: Recall TypeScript abstract class syntax

   The correct syntax places the keyword abstract before class, followed by the class name.

2. Step 2: Check each option

   Only abstract class Vehicle {} correctly uses abstract class Vehicle {}. Others have incorrect keyword order.

3. Final Answer:

   abstract class Vehicle {} -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Abstract class syntax = abstract class Name {} [OK]

Hint: Put 'abstract' before 'class' keyword [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Placing 'abstract' after 'class'
• Mixing keyword order
• Omitting 'abstract' keyword

3. What will be the output of the following TypeScript code?

abstract class Animal {
  abstract makeSound(): void;
  move(): void {
    console.log('Moving');
  }
}

class Dog extends Animal {
  makeSound(): void {
    console.log('Bark');
  }
}

const dog = new Dog();
dog.makeSound();
dog.move();

medium

A. Moving\nBark

B. No output

C. Error: Cannot create instance of abstract class

D. Bark\nMoving

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand class inheritance and method calls

   The class Dog extends Animal and implements makeSound(). Calling dog.makeSound() prints 'Bark'.

2. Step 2: Check the move() method call

   The move() method is implemented in Animal and prints 'Moving'. Calling dog.move() prints 'Moving'.

3. Final Answer:

   Bark Moving -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Subclass methods run, abstract class methods inherited [OK]

Hint: Abstract methods must be implemented; inherited methods run normally [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Thinking abstract class instance is created
• Confusing method call order
• Expecting errors on calling inherited methods

4. Identify the error in the following TypeScript code:

abstract class Shape {
  abstract area(): number;
}

class Circle extends Shape {
  radius: number;
  constructor(radius: number) {
    super();
    this.radius = radius;
  }
}

medium

A. Circle must implement the abstract method area()

B. Abstract class cannot have abstract methods

C. radius property should be private

D. Missing call to super() in Circle constructor

Solution

1. Step 1: Check abstract method implementation

   The abstract class Shape declares an abstract method area(). Any subclass must implement this method.

2. Step 2: Verify Circle class methods

   The Circle class does not implement area(), so this causes a compile-time error.

3. Final Answer:

   Circle must implement the abstract method area() -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Abstract methods require subclass implementation [OK]

Hint: All abstract methods must be implemented in subclasses [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Forgetting to implement abstract methods
• Thinking super() call is not mandatory when base has no constructor
• Confusing abstract methods with optional methods

5. Given the abstract class below, which implementation correctly uses it to calculate the area of a rectangle?

abstract class Shape {
  abstract area(): number;
}

// Choose the correct Rectangle class implementation

hard

A. class Rectangle extends Shape {
width: number;
height: number;
constructor(width: number, height: number) {
this.width = width;
this.height = height;
}
area(): number {
return this.width + this.height;
}
}

B. class Rectangle extends Shape {
width: number;
height: number;
constructor(width: number, height: number) {
super();
this.width = width;
this.height = height;
}
area(): number {
return this.width * this.height;
}
}

C. class Rectangle extends Shape {
width: number;
height: number;
constructor(width: number, height: number) {
super();
this.width = width;
this.height = height;
}
area(): number {
return this.width + this.height;
}
}

D. class Rectangle extends Shape {
width: number;
height: number;
constructor(width: number, height: number) {
super();
this.width = width;
this.height = height;
}
}

Solution

1. Step 1: Check constructor and super() call

   Since Shape has no constructor, calling super() is required before using this in the subclass constructor.

2. Step 2: Verify area() method correctness

   class Rectangle extends Shape { width: number; height: number; constructor(width: number, height: number) { super(); this.width = width; this.height = height; } area(): number { return this.width * this.height; } } correctly implements area() returning width * height, which is the rectangle's area.

3. Step 3: Check other options for errors

   class Rectangle extends Shape { width: number; height: number; constructor(width: number, height: number) { this.width = width; this.height = height; } area(): number { return this.width + this.height; } } return width + height, which is incorrect for area. class Rectangle extends Shape { width: number; height: number; constructor(width: number, height: number) { super(); this.width = width; this.height = height; } } lacks area() implementation, causing error.

4. Final Answer:

   class Rectangle extends Shape { width: number; height: number; constructor(width: number, height: number) { super(); this.width = width; this.height = height; } area(): number { return this.width * this.height; } } -> Option B

5. Quick Check:

   Correct area method and constructor = class Rectangle extends Shape { width: number; height: number; constructor(width: number, height: number) { super(); this.width = width; this.height = height; } area(): number { return this.width * this.height; } } [OK]

Hint: Area of rectangle = width * height; implement abstract method [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Returning sum instead of product for area
• Omitting abstract method implementation
• Forgetting to assign constructor parameters