Under-defined vs fully-defined vs over-defined in Solidworks - Dashboard Approaches Compared

Dashboard Mode - Under-defined vs fully-defined vs over-defined

Goal

Understand how many parts in a SolidWorks assembly are under-defined, fully-defined, or over-defined to improve design stability.

Sample Data

Part ID	Part Name	Definition Status	Number of Constraints
1	Bracket	Under-defined	2
2	Base Plate	Fully-defined	5
3	Arm	Over-defined	7
4	Pin	Fully-defined	5
5	Cover	Under-defined	3
6	Screw	Fully-defined	5
7	Spring	Over-defined	8

Dashboard Components

• KPI Cards: Show count of parts by definition status.
  Formulas:
  Under-defined count = COUNTROWS(FILTER(Parts, Parts[Definition Status] = "Under-defined")) = 2
  Fully-defined count = COUNTROWS(FILTER(Parts, Parts[Definition Status] = "Fully-defined")) = 3
  Over-defined count = COUNTROWS(FILTER(Parts, Parts[Definition Status] = "Over-defined")) = 2
• Bar Chart: X-axis: Definition Status, Y-axis: Number of Parts.
  Shows counts of parts per status.
• Table: Lists all parts with their definition status and number of constraints.

Dashboard Layout

+----------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|  KPI: Under-defined   |  KPI: Fully-defined  |  KPI: Over-defined   |
|      Count: 2        |      Count: 3        |      Count: 2        |
+----------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|                      Bar Chart: Parts Count by Definition Status                      |
|               (Under-defined, Fully-defined, Over-defined)                         |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                                Table: Parts Details                                |
| (Part ID, Part Name, Definition Status, Number of Constraints)                      |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Interactivity

Adding a filter by Definition Status updates the bar chart and table to show only parts matching the selected status. The KPI cards remain visible to show overall counts.

Self Check

If you add a filter to show only Fully-defined parts, which components update?

• The bar chart updates to show only the count for Fully-defined parts.
• The table updates to list only Fully-defined parts.
• The KPI cards remain unchanged, showing total counts for all statuses.

Key Result

Dashboard shows counts and details of SolidWorks parts by their definition status: under-defined, fully-defined, and over-defined.

Practice

1.

Which of the following best describes a fully-defined sketch in SolidWorks?

easy

A. The sketch has conflicting constraints causing errors.

B. The sketch has too few constraints and can still move or change.

C. The sketch is missing all constraints and is free to move.

D. The sketch has just enough constraints to fix its position and shape.

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand sketch constraint types

   Under-defined means not enough constraints, fully-defined means just enough, and over-defined means too many constraints causing conflicts.

2. Step 2: Identify fully-defined sketch meaning

   A fully-defined sketch is fixed in place with no degrees of freedom left, meaning it has just enough constraints.

3. Final Answer:

   The sketch has just enough constraints to fix its position and shape. -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Fully-defined = just right constraints [OK]

Hint: Fully-defined means no movement possible [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing fully-defined with over-defined
• Thinking fully-defined means no constraints
• Assuming under-defined is fixed

2.

Which of these constraint sets will cause a sketch to be over-defined?

1. Horizontal line fixed length
2. Horizontal line fixed length + another length constraint on same line
3. Vertical line with one length constraint
4. Circle with radius constraint only

easy

A. Option 3 only

B. Option 2 only

C. Option 4 only

D. Option 1 only

Solution

1. Step 1: Analyze constraints for over-definition

   Over-defined means conflicting or redundant constraints. Option 2 has two length constraints on the same line, causing conflict.

2. Step 2: Check other options

   Options 1, 3, and 4 have only one constraint per element, so they are not over-defined.

3. Final Answer:

   Option 2 only -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Multiple conflicting constraints = over-defined [OK]

Hint: Two constraints on same element cause over-defined [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Thinking one constraint is over-defined
• Confusing under-defined with over-defined
• Ignoring conflicting constraints

3.

Given a sketch with a rectangle where only two adjacent sides have length constraints and no other constraints, what is the sketch state?

medium

A. Under-defined

B. Fixed

C. Over-defined

D. Fully-defined

Solution

1. Step 1: Identify constraints on rectangle

   Two adjacent sides have length constraints, but no position or angle constraints are given.

2. Step 2: Determine sketch freedom

   Without fixing position or angles, the rectangle can still move or rotate, so it is under-defined.

3. Final Answer:

   Under-defined -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Not enough constraints = under-defined [OK]

Hint: Missing position constraints means under-defined [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Assuming length constraints alone fully define sketch
• Confusing fixed with fully-defined
• Ignoring degrees of freedom like rotation

4.

Look at this sketch constraint setup:

1. A line fixed length 50mm
2. Another length constraint 60mm on the same line
3. Horizontal constraint on the line

What is the problem and how to fix it?

medium

A. Over-defined due to conflicting length constraints; remove one length constraint.

B. Under-defined because horizontal constraint is missing; add horizontal constraint.

C. Fully-defined; no problem exists.

D. Over-defined due to missing horizontal constraint; add horizontal constraint.

Solution

1. Step 1: Identify conflicting constraints

   The line has two different length constraints (50mm and 60mm), which conflict and cause over-definition.

2. Step 2: Fix by removing conflict

   Removing one length constraint resolves the conflict and fixes the over-defined state.

3. Final Answer:

   Over-defined due to conflicting length constraints; remove one length constraint. -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Conflicting constraints cause over-defined [OK]

Hint: Remove conflicting constraints to fix over-defined [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Adding more constraints instead of removing
• Ignoring conflicting lengths
• Assuming horizontal constraint fixes over-definition

5.

You have a sketch of a triangle with all three sides length constrained and one angle constrained between two sides. The sketch still shows as under-defined. What could be the reason?

hard

A. The sketch is over-defined due to too many constraints on sides.

B. The angle constraint conflicts with side lengths causing errors.

C. The triangle can still move or rotate because position constraints are missing.

D. All constraints fully define the sketch; this is a software bug.

Solution

1. Step 1: Analyze given constraints

   All sides have length constraints and one angle is fixed, but no constraints fix the triangle's position in the plane.

2. Step 2: Understand under-defined cause

   Without fixing position (like fixing a point or adding horizontal/vertical constraints), the sketch can still move or rotate, so it remains under-defined.

3. Final Answer:

   The triangle can still move or rotate because position constraints are missing. -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Missing position constraints cause under-defined [OK]

Hint: Fix position to fully define sketch [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Assuming side lengths alone fully define sketch
• Confusing over-defined with under-defined
• Ignoring need for position constraints