0
0
Pandasdata~10 mins

append equivalent with concat in Pandas - Step-by-Step Execution

Choose your learning style9 modes available
Concept Flow - append equivalent with concat
Start with DataFrame A
Have DataFrame B to add
Use pd.concat([A, B
Combine rows of A and B
New DataFrame with rows from A and B
End
We start with two data tables (DataFrames). We use concat to join them by stacking rows, creating a new combined table.
Execution Sample
Pandas
import pandas as pd

df1 = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2]})
df2 = pd.DataFrame({'A': [3, 4]})

result = pd.concat([df1, df2], ignore_index=True)
print(result)
This code stacks two DataFrames df1 and df2 vertically, resetting the index.
Execution Table
StepActionDataFrames InvolvedResulting DataFrame RowsIndex Reset
1Create df1df1Rows: 2 (values 1, 2)Index: 0,1
2Create df2df2Rows: 2 (values 3, 4)Index: 0,1
3Call pd.concat([df1, df2], ignore_index=True)df1 and df2Rows: 4 (1,2,3,4)Index reset to 0,1,2,3
4Print resultresultRows: 4 (1,2,3,4)Index: 0,1,2,3
💡 All rows from df1 and df2 combined; index reset because ignore_index=True
Variable Tracker
VariableStartAfter Step 1After Step 2After Step 3Final
df1NoneDataFrame with 2 rows (1,2)SameSameSame
df2NoneNoneDataFrame with 2 rows (3,4)SameSame
resultNoneNoneNoneDataFrame with 4 rows (1,2,3,4)Same
Key Moments - 2 Insights
Why do we use ignore_index=True in pd.concat?
Without ignore_index=True, the combined DataFrame keeps original indexes, which can cause duplicate indexes. The execution_table step 3 shows index reset to 0,1,2,3 to avoid this.
Is pd.concat([df1, df2]) exactly the same as df1.append(df2)?
Yes, pd.concat([df1, df2]) is the modern equivalent of df1.append(df2). The execution_table step 3 shows concat combining rows just like append would.
Visual Quiz - 3 Questions
Test your understanding
Look at the execution_table at step 3, how many rows does the resulting DataFrame have?
A2
B4
C3
D5
💡 Hint
Check the 'Resulting DataFrame Rows' column at step 3 in execution_table.
According to variable_tracker, what is the value of 'result' after step 3?
ANone
BDataFrame with 2 rows
CDataFrame with 4 rows
DDataFrame with 3 rows
💡 Hint
Look at the 'result' row under 'After Step 3' in variable_tracker.
If we remove ignore_index=True from pd.concat, what happens to the index in the result?
AIndex keeps original values, possibly duplicated
BIndex resets to 0,1,2,3
CIndex becomes empty
DCode throws an error
💡 Hint
Refer to key_moments explanation about ignore_index and execution_table step 3.
Concept Snapshot
pd.concat([df1, df2]) stacks DataFrames vertically.
Use ignore_index=True to reset index.
Equivalent to df1.append(df2).
Returns a new DataFrame combining all rows.
Useful for merging data tables by rows.
Full Transcript
We start with two DataFrames, df1 and df2, each with two rows. Using pd.concat([df1, df2], ignore_index=True), we combine them into one DataFrame with four rows. The index is reset to avoid duplicates. This method is the modern replacement for df1.append(df2). The execution table shows each step: creating df1 and df2, concatenating them, and printing the result. The variable tracker shows how df1 and df2 remain unchanged, and result holds the combined DataFrame. Key moments clarify why ignore_index is important and confirm concat is like append. The quiz tests understanding of row counts, variable states, and index behavior.