Bird
Raised Fist0
Pandasdata~10 mins

append equivalent with concat in Pandas - Interactive Code Practice

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Practice - 5 Tasks
Answer the questions below
1fill in blank
easy

Complete the code to combine two DataFrames using pandas concat.

Pandas
import pandas as pd

df1 = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2]})
df2 = pd.DataFrame({'A': [3, 4]})
result = pd.[1]([df1, df2])
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Amerge
Bappend
Cconcat
Djoin
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using 'append' which is deprecated in recent pandas versions.
Using 'merge' which is for joining on keys, not simple stacking.
2fill in blank
medium

Complete the code to reset the index after concatenating two DataFrames.

Pandas
import pandas as pd

df1 = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2]})
df2 = pd.DataFrame({'A': [3, 4]})
result = pd.concat([df1, df2], [1]=True)
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Aignore_index
Bdrop
Creset_index
Dinplace
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using 'reset_index' as a parameter to concat (it is a method on DataFrame).
Using 'drop' which is unrelated here.
3fill in blank
hard

Fix the error in the code to concatenate two DataFrames along columns.

Pandas
import pandas as pd

df1 = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2]})
df2 = pd.DataFrame({'B': [3, 4]})
result = pd.concat([df1, df2], axis=[1])
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
A-1
B0
C2
D1
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using axis=0 which stacks rows instead of columns.
Using invalid axis values like 2 or -1.
4fill in blank
hard

Fill both blanks to create a concatenated DataFrame with a new index and drop the old index.

Pandas
import pandas as pd

df1 = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2]}, index=[10, 20])
df2 = pd.DataFrame({'A': [3, 4]}, index=[30, 40])
result = pd.concat([df1, df2], [1]=True).[2](drop=True)
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Aignore_index
Breset_index
Csort
Ddrop
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using 'drop' as a parameter to concat (it is a method parameter).
Confusing 'sort' with index resetting.
5fill in blank
hard

Fill all three blanks to concatenate two DataFrames vertically, reset the index, and sort columns.

Pandas
import pandas as pd

df1 = pd.DataFrame({'B': [1, 2], 'A': [3, 4]})
df2 = pd.DataFrame({'A': [5, 6], 'B': [7, 8]})
result = pd.concat([df1, df2], [1]=True).[2](drop=True).[3](axis=1)
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Aignore_index
Breset_index
Csort_index
Dsort_values
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using sort_values instead of sort_index for sorting columns.
Not dropping the old index after reset.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What is the main reason to use pandas.concat() instead of DataFrame.append()?
easy
A. concat() is faster for single DataFrame addition only
B. Because append() is deprecated and concat() can join multiple DataFrames at once
C. append() works only for columns, not rows
D. concat() automatically sorts columns alphabetically

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the deprecation of append()

    The append() method is deprecated in pandas and will be removed in future versions.
  2. Step 2: Recognize concat() advantages

    concat() can join multiple DataFrames at once, not just one, making it more flexible.
  3. Final Answer:

    Because append() is deprecated and concat() can join multiple DataFrames at once -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    append() deprecated, concat() multi-join [OK]
Hint: Remember: concat replaces append and handles many DataFrames [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Thinking append is still recommended
  • Believing concat only works for columns
  • Assuming append is faster than concat
2. Which of the following is the correct syntax to replace df1.append(df2, ignore_index=True) using concat?
easy
A. pd.concat([df1, df2], ignore_index=True)
B. pd.concat([df1, df2], axis=0)
C. pd.concat(df1, df2, ignore_index=True)
D. pd.concat([df1, df2], axis=1, ignore_index=True)

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify the correct function call

    pd.concat() requires a list of DataFrames as the first argument, so [df1, df2] is correct.
  2. Step 2: Use ignore_index=True to reset row numbers

    To mimic append(ignore_index=True), pass ignore_index=True to concat(). The default axis is 0 (rows), so no need to specify.
  3. Final Answer:

    pd.concat([df1, df2], ignore_index=True) -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    List of DataFrames + ignore_index=True = correct concat syntax [OK]
Hint: Use list of DataFrames and ignore_index=True with concat [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Passing DataFrames without list brackets
  • Using axis=1 to add rows (wrong axis)
  • Omitting ignore_index when needed
3. Given the code:
import pandas as pd

df1 = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2]})
df2 = pd.DataFrame({'A': [3, 4]})
result = pd.concat([df1, df2], ignore_index=True)
print(result)

What will be the output?
medium
A. A 0 1 1 2 0 3 1 4
B. A 0 3 1 4
C. A 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4
D. Error because ignore_index is not valid

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand concat with ignore_index=True

    concat joins rows from both DataFrames and resets the index to 0,1,2,...
  2. Step 2: Combine rows and reset index

    Rows from df1 (1,2) and df2 (3,4) stack vertically with new index 0 to 3.
  3. Final Answer:

    A 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    concat stacks rows and resets index with ignore_index=True [OK]
Hint: concat stacks rows; ignore_index resets numbering [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Expecting original indexes to remain
  • Confusing axis parameter
  • Thinking concat drops rows
4. What is wrong with this code snippet?
import pandas as pd

df1 = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2]})
df2 = pd.DataFrame({'A': [3, 4]})
result = pd.concat(df1, df2, ignore_index=True)
print(result)
medium
A. The DataFrames should be passed as a list inside concat
B. ignore_index is not a valid argument for concat
C. concat cannot join DataFrames with same columns
D. The code will run without errors and print combined DataFrame

Solution

  1. Step 1: Check concat argument format

    pd.concat() expects a list or iterable of DataFrames as the first argument, but here two DataFrames are passed as separate arguments.
  2. Step 2: Identify correct usage

    Correct usage is pd.concat([df1, df2], ignore_index=True) with square brackets around DataFrames.
  3. Final Answer:

    The DataFrames should be passed as a list inside concat -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    concat needs list of DataFrames [OK]
Hint: Always pass DataFrames as a list to concat [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Passing DataFrames as separate arguments
  • Forgetting brackets around DataFrames
  • Misusing ignore_index parameter
5. You have three DataFrames:
df1 = pd.DataFrame({'X': [1, 2]})
df2 = pd.DataFrame({'X': [3], 'Y': [5]})
df3 = pd.DataFrame({'X': [4], 'Y': [6]})

You want to combine them vertically using concat so that missing columns fill with NaN and the index resets. Which code achieves this?
hard
A. pd.concat(df1, df2, df3, ignore_index=True)
B. pd.concat([df1, df2, df3], axis=1, ignore_index=True)
C. pd.concat([df1, df2, df3], join='inner', ignore_index=True)
D. pd.concat([df1, df2, df3], ignore_index=True)

Solution

  1. Step 1: Combine DataFrames vertically with concat

    Use pd.concat() with a list of DataFrames to stack rows.
  2. Step 2: Handle missing columns and reset index

    Default join='outer' fills missing columns with NaN. Use ignore_index=True to reset row numbers.
  3. Final Answer:

    pd.concat([df1, df2, df3], ignore_index=True) -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    concat list, default outer join, ignore_index=True [OK]
Hint: Use concat list with ignore_index=True for clean vertical join [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using axis=1 to join rows (actually joins columns)
  • Using join='inner' which drops columns
  • Passing DataFrames without list brackets
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard