Which statement best describes the purpose of component variants in Figma?
Think about how you manage buttons with different colors or sizes in one place.
Component variants let you group similar components with different properties, like color or size, into one organized set. This helps keep designs tidy and easy to update.
You have a button component with variants for 'Primary', 'Secondary', and 'Disabled' states. Which visualization best shows how these variants are organized in Figma?
Think about how variants let you switch states inside one component.
Component variants use properties like dropdowns to switch between states inside a single component, making it easy to manage and use.
You want to create a component variant for a card with two properties: 'Size' (Small, Medium, Large) and 'Status' (Active, Inactive). How many unique variants will you have?
Multiply the number of options in each property to find total variants.
With 3 sizes and 2 statuses, total variants = 3 x 2 = 6 unique variants.
You created two variant properties both named 'State' but with different options. What problem will this cause in Figma?
Think about how unique property names help Figma distinguish variants.
Having two properties with the same name causes Figma to merge them, which can lead to wrong variant behavior and confusion.
You are designing a dashboard with buttons that have three properties: 'Color' (Red, Green, Blue), 'Size' (Small, Large), and 'Icon' (Yes, No). To keep the component library manageable, what is the best approach?
Think about reusability and reducing variant explosion.
Using nested components lets you manage complex properties efficiently by separating concerns, reducing the total number of variants needed.