Bird
Raised Fist0
SQLquery~10 mins

Running total without window functions in SQL - Interactive Code Practice

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Practice - 5 Tasks
Answer the questions below
1fill in blank
easy

Complete the code to select all sales amounts from the sales table.

SQL
SELECT [1] FROM sales;
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Aprice
Btotal
Camount
Dvalue
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Selecting a column name that does not exist in the table.
Using a keyword instead of a column name.
2fill in blank
medium

Complete the code to calculate the running total of sales amounts using a correlated subquery.

SQL
SELECT s1.id, s1.amount, (SELECT SUM(s2.amount) FROM sales s2 WHERE s2.id <= [1]) AS running_total FROM sales s1 ORDER BY s1.id;
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
As1.id
Bs2.id
Cs2.amount
Ds1.amount
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using the inner query alias s2.id instead of the outer s1.id.
Comparing the wrong columns in the WHERE clause.
3fill in blank
hard

Fix the error in the code to correctly calculate the running total without window functions.

SQL
SELECT id, amount, (SELECT SUM(amount) FROM sales WHERE id [1] id) AS running_total FROM sales ORDER BY id;
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
A>
B>=
C=
D<=
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using = which sums only the current row.
Using > which sums rows after the current one.
4fill in blank
hard

Fill both blanks to create a running total query that sums amounts up to the current row id.

SQL
SELECT s1.id, s1.amount, (SELECT SUM([1]) FROM sales s2 WHERE s2.id [2] s1.id) AS running_total FROM sales s1 ORDER BY s1.id;
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Aamount
B<=
C>=
Dtotal
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using the wrong column name in the sum.
Using the wrong comparison operator.
5fill in blank
hard

Fill all three blanks to write a running total query without window functions, using aliases and correct comparison.

SQL
SELECT [1], [2], (SELECT SUM([3]) FROM sales s2 WHERE s2.id <= s1.id) AS running_total FROM sales s1 ORDER BY s1.id;
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
As1.id
Bs1.amount
Camount
Did
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using columns without the correct alias.
Using the wrong column name in the sum.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What is the main idea behind calculating a running total without using window functions in SQL?
easy
A. Use GROUP BY to group all rows together.
B. Use the SUM() function without any conditions.
C. Use a JOIN to combine unrelated tables.
D. Use a subquery to sum all previous rows up to the current row.

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand running total concept

    A running total means adding values step-by-step, including all previous rows up to the current one.
  2. Step 2: Identify method without window functions

    Without window functions, a common way is to use a subquery that sums all rows with an ID less than or equal to the current row's ID.
  3. Final Answer:

    Use a subquery to sum all previous rows up to the current row. -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Running total = cumulative sum using subquery [OK]
Hint: Think cumulative sum using subquery with condition [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using SUM() without filtering rows
  • Trying to use GROUP BY for running total
  • Confusing JOIN with running total calculation
2. Which of the following SQL queries correctly calculates a running total of the amount column without using window functions, assuming id orders the rows?
easy
A. SELECT id, amount, (SELECT SUM(amount) FROM sales WHERE id <= s.id) AS running_total FROM sales s ORDER BY id;
B. SELECT id, amount, SUM(amount) OVER (ORDER BY id) AS running_total FROM sales ORDER BY id;
C. SELECT id, amount, SUM(amount) FROM sales GROUP BY id ORDER BY id;
D. SELECT id, amount, amount + LAG(amount) FROM sales ORDER BY id;

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify correct syntax without window functions

    SELECT id, amount, (SELECT SUM(amount) FROM sales WHERE id <= s.id) AS running_total FROM sales s ORDER BY id; uses a correlated subquery summing amounts where id is less or equal to current row's id, which is correct for running total without window functions.
  2. Step 2: Check other options for errors

    SELECT id, amount, SUM(amount) OVER (ORDER BY id) AS running_total FROM sales ORDER BY id; uses window function SUM() OVER, which is not allowed here. SELECT id, amount, SUM(amount) FROM sales GROUP BY id ORDER BY id; misuses GROUP BY without running total logic. SELECT id, amount, amount + LAG(amount) FROM sales ORDER BY id; uses LAG() which is a window function.
  3. Final Answer:

    SELECT id, amount, (SELECT SUM(amount) FROM sales WHERE id <= s.id) AS running_total FROM sales s ORDER BY id; -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Subquery sums previous rows correctly [OK]
Hint: Look for subquery with condition id <= current id [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using window functions despite instructions
  • Misusing GROUP BY without aggregation logic
  • Using LAG() which is a window function
3. Given the table sales with rows:
id | amount
1 | 10
2 | 20
3 | 15

What is the output of this query?
SELECT id, amount, (SELECT SUM(amount) FROM sales WHERE id <= s.id) AS running_total FROM sales s ORDER BY id;
medium
A. 1 | 10 | 10
2 | 20 | 20
3 | 15 | 15
B. 1 | 10 | 10
2 | 20 | 30
3 | 15 | 45
C. 1 | 10 | 10
2 | 20 | 25
3 | 15 | 40
D. 1 | 10 | 10
2 | 20 | 30
3 | 15 | 15

Solution

  1. Step 1: Calculate running total for each row

    For id=1: sum amounts where id <=1 is 10.
    For id=2: sum amounts where id <=2 is 10+20=30.
    For id=3: sum amounts where id <=3 is 10+20+15=45.
  2. Step 2: Match calculated values with options

    1 | 10 | 10
    2 | 20 | 30
    3 | 15 | 45 matches these running totals exactly.
  3. Final Answer:

    1 | 10 | 10
    2 | 20 | 30
    3 | 15 | 45
    -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Running total sums all previous rows [OK]
Hint: Add amounts cumulatively by id order [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Summing only current row amount
  • Not including all previous rows in sum
  • Mixing up running total values
4. Consider this query intended to calculate a running total:
SELECT id, amount, (SELECT SUM(amount) FROM sales WHERE id < s.id) AS running_total FROM sales s ORDER BY id;

What is the main issue with this query?
medium
A. It will cause a syntax error due to missing GROUP BY.
B. It uses window functions which are not allowed.
C. It excludes the current row's amount from the running total.
D. It sums amounts from unrelated tables.

Solution

  1. Step 1: Analyze the subquery condition

    The subquery sums amounts where id is less than current row's id, so it excludes the current row's amount.
  2. Step 2: Understand running total definition

    Running total should include the current row's amount, so condition should be id <= s.id, not id < s.id.
  3. Final Answer:

    It excludes the current row's amount from the running total. -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Use id <= current id to include current row [OK]
Hint: Check if current row is included in sum condition [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using < instead of <= in subquery condition
  • Expecting window functions in this query
  • Assuming syntax error due to GROUP BY
5. You have a transactions table with columns trans_id, user_id, and amount. You want to calculate a running total of amount for each user_id ordered by trans_id, but you cannot use window functions. Which query correctly achieves this?
hard
A. SELECT t1.trans_id, t1.user_id, t1.amount, (SELECT SUM(t2.amount) FROM transactions t2 WHERE t2.user_id = t1.user_id AND t2.trans_id <= t1.trans_id) AS running_total FROM transactions t1 ORDER BY t1.user_id, t1.trans_id;
B. SELECT trans_id, user_id, amount, SUM(amount) OVER (PARTITION BY user_id ORDER BY trans_id) AS running_total FROM transactions ORDER BY user_id, trans_id;
C. SELECT trans_id, user_id, amount, SUM(amount) FROM transactions GROUP BY user_id, trans_id ORDER BY user_id, trans_id;
D. SELECT t1.trans_id, t1.user_id, t1.amount, (SELECT SUM(amount) FROM transactions WHERE trans_id <= t1.trans_id) AS running_total FROM transactions t1 ORDER BY user_id, trans_id;

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand requirement for per-user running total

    Running total must reset for each user_id and sum amounts up to current trans_id.
  2. Step 2: Analyze options for correct filtering

    SELECT t1.trans_id, t1.user_id, t1.amount, (SELECT SUM(t2.amount) FROM transactions t2 WHERE t2.user_id = t1.user_id AND t2.trans_id <= t1.trans_id) AS running_total FROM transactions t1 ORDER BY t1.user_id, t1.trans_id; uses a correlated subquery filtering by same user_id and trans_id less or equal current, correctly calculating running total per user.
  3. Step 3: Identify errors in other options

    SELECT trans_id, user_id, amount, SUM(amount) OVER (PARTITION BY user_id ORDER BY trans_id) AS running_total FROM transactions ORDER BY user_id, trans_id; uses window functions (not allowed). SELECT trans_id, user_id, amount, SUM(amount) FROM transactions GROUP BY user_id, trans_id ORDER BY user_id, trans_id; misuses GROUP BY without running total logic. SELECT t1.trans_id, t1.user_id, t1.amount, (SELECT SUM(amount) FROM transactions WHERE trans_id <= t1.trans_id) AS running_total FROM transactions t1 ORDER BY user_id, trans_id; sums amounts ignoring user_id, mixing all users.
  4. Final Answer:

    SELECT t1.trans_id, t1.user_id, t1.amount, (SELECT SUM(t2.amount) FROM transactions t2 WHERE t2.user_id = t1.user_id AND t2.trans_id <= t1.trans_id) AS running_total FROM transactions t1 ORDER BY t1.user_id, t1.trans_id; -> Option A
  5. Quick Check:

    Subquery filters by user and trans_id for running total [OK]
Hint: Filter subquery by user_id and trans_id <= current [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Ignoring user_id in running total calculation
  • Using window functions despite restriction
  • Not ordering results properly
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard