LEAD function for next row access in SQL - Step-by-Step Execution

Concept Flow - LEAD function for next row access

Start with ordered rows

↓

For each row

↓

Look at next row in order

↓

Return value from next row

↓

If no next row, return NULL or default

↓

Output current row + next row value

The LEAD function looks at the next row in a defined order and returns a value from that row for the current row, or NULL if there is no next row.

Execution Sample

SQL

SELECT id, sales, LEAD(sales) OVER (ORDER BY id) AS next_sales
FROM sales_data;

This query shows each row's sales and the sales value from the next row ordered by id.

Execution Table

Row	id	sales	LEAD(sales) OVER (ORDER BY id)	Explanation
1	101	200	250	Next row id=102 sales=250 returned
2	102	250	300	Next row id=103 sales=300 returned
3	103	300	NULL	No next row, so NULL returned

💡 No next row after id=103, so LEAD returns NULL

Variable Tracker

Variable	Start	After Row 1	After Row 2	After Row 3
id	N/A	101	102	103
sales	N/A	200	250	300
LEAD(sales)	N/A	250	300	NULL

Key Moments - 2 Insights

Why does LEAD return NULL for the last row?

Because there is no next row after the last one, LEAD returns NULL as shown in execution_table row 3.

Does LEAD change the order of rows?

No, LEAD uses the order to look ahead but the output rows stay in the original order, as seen in the execution_table.

Visual Quiz - 3 Questions

Look at the execution_table, what is the LEAD(sales) value for row with id=102?

A 200

B 250

C 300

D NULL

💡 Hint

Check the second row in execution_table under LEAD(sales) column

At which row does LEAD return NULL?

A Row 1

B Row 3

C Row 2

D None

💡 Hint

Look at the last row in execution_table for LEAD(sales) value

If we order by sales descending, how would LEAD(sales) for id=101 change?

A It would be 300

B It would be 250

C It would be NULL

D It would be 200

💡 Hint

Ordering changes next row; check how LEAD depends on ORDER BY clause

Concept Snapshot

LEAD(column) OVER (ORDER BY col) returns the next row's column value
in the specified order. If no next row, returns NULL by default.
Useful for comparing current row with next row data.
Does not change row order in output.
Can specify default value instead of NULL.

Full Transcript

The LEAD function in SQL lets you look at the next row's value in a result set ordered by a column. For each row, LEAD returns the value from the next row in that order. If there is no next row, it returns NULL by default. This is useful to compare current row data with the next row, like seeing next sales amount. The rows stay in the original order; LEAD just peeks ahead. For example, with rows ordered by id, LEAD(sales) returns the sales value from the next id. The last row has no next row, so LEAD returns NULL there. Changing the ORDER BY changes which row is considered next. LEAD helps analyze sequences or trends in data.

Practice

1. What does the SQL LEAD function do in a query?

easy

A. Returns the value from the previous row in the result set

B. Returns the value from the next row in the result set

C. Calculates the sum of values in a column

D. Filters rows based on a condition

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand LEAD function purpose

   The LEAD function is used to access data from the next row relative to the current row without changing the current row position.

2. Step 2: Compare options with LEAD behavior

   Returns the value from the next row in the result set correctly describes this behavior. Options B, C, and D describe other functions or operations.

3. Final Answer:

   Returns the value from the next row in the result set -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   LEAD = next row value [OK]

Hint: LEAD looks forward one row by default [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing LEAD with LAG (previous row)
• Thinking LEAD filters rows
• Assuming LEAD sums values

2. Which of the following is the correct syntax to use the LEAD function to get the next row's salary ordered by employee_id?

easy

A. LEAD(salary) OVER (ORDER BY employee_id)

B. LEAD(salary ORDER BY employee_id)

C. LEAD(salary) ORDER BY employee_id

D. LEAD(salary) BY employee_id

Solution

1. Step 1: Recall LEAD function syntax

   The LEAD function requires an OVER clause with an ORDER BY to define the row order for accessing the next row.

2. Step 2: Match syntax with options

   LEAD(salary) OVER (ORDER BY employee_id) correctly uses LEAD(salary) OVER (ORDER BY employee_id). Options A, B, and D have incorrect syntax.

3. Final Answer:

   LEAD(salary) OVER (ORDER BY employee_id) -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   LEAD + OVER + ORDER BY = correct syntax [OK]

Hint: LEAD needs OVER(ORDER BY ...) syntax [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Omitting OVER clause
• Placing ORDER BY inside LEAD parentheses
• Using BY instead of ORDER BY

3. Given the table Employees with columns id and salary sorted by id, what will be the output of this query?

SELECT id, salary, LEAD(salary) OVER (ORDER BY id) AS next_salary FROM Employees;

Assuming data:
id | salary
1 | 5000
2 | 6000
3 | 5500

medium

A. [{id:1, salary:5000, next_salary:6000}, {id:2, salary:6000, next_salary:null}, {id:3, salary:5500, next_salary:5500}]

B. [{id:1, salary:5000, next_salary:5500}, {id:2, salary:6000, next_salary:5000}, {id:3, salary:5500, next_salary:6000}]

C. [{id:1, salary:5000, next_salary:null}, {id:2, salary:6000, next_salary:null}, {id:3, salary:5500, next_salary:null}]

D. [{id:1, salary:5000, next_salary:6000}, {id:2, salary:6000, next_salary:5500}, {id:3, salary:5500, next_salary:null}]

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand LEAD output for each row

   LEAD(salary) returns the salary from the next row ordered by id. For id=1, next_salary is salary of id=2 (6000). For id=2, next_salary is salary of id=3 (5500). For id=3, no next row exists, so next_salary is NULL.

2. Step 2: Match output with options

   [{id:1, salary:5000, next_salary:6000}, {id:2, salary:6000, next_salary:5500}, {id:3, salary:5500, next_salary:null}] matches this output exactly. Other options have incorrect next_salary values.

3. Final Answer:

   [{id:1, salary:5000, next_salary:6000}, {id:2, salary:6000, next_salary:5500}, {id:3, salary:5500, next_salary:null}] -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   LEAD returns next row's salary or NULL [OK]

Hint: Next row salary follows order, last row gets NULL [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Mixing up next and previous rows
• Expecting last row to have a value
• Ignoring ORDER BY in LEAD

4. Identify the error in this SQL query using LEAD:

SELECT id, salary, LEAD(salary, 2) ORDER BY id FROM Employees;

medium

A. salary column does not exist

B. LEAD cannot take a second argument

C. Missing OVER clause with ORDER BY inside LEAD function

D. ORDER BY cannot be used in SELECT clause

Solution

1. Step 1: Check LEAD function syntax

   LEAD requires an OVER clause with ORDER BY to specify row order. The query misses the OVER(...) part.

2. Step 2: Analyze the query error

   ORDER BY is incorrectly placed outside OVER clause and LEAD function lacks OVER clause, causing syntax error.

3. Final Answer:

   Missing OVER clause with ORDER BY inside LEAD function -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   LEAD needs OVER(ORDER BY ...) [OK]

Hint: LEAD always needs OVER with ORDER BY [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Omitting OVER clause
• Placing ORDER BY outside OVER
• Assuming LEAD can't take offset argument

5. You want to find each employee's salary and the salary two rows ahead ordered by hire_date. If no such row exists, show 0 instead of NULL. Which query correctly uses LEAD to achieve this?

hard

A. SELECT id, salary, LEAD(salary, 2, 0) OVER (ORDER BY hire_date) AS salary_after_two FROM Employees;

B. SELECT id, salary, LEAD(salary, 0, 2) OVER (ORDER BY hire_date) AS salary_after_two FROM Employees;

C. SELECT id, salary, LEAD(salary, 2) OVER (ORDER BY hire_date) AS salary_after_two FROM Employees WHERE salary_after_two IS NOT NULL;

D. SELECT id, salary, LEAD(salary, 2, NULL) OVER (ORDER BY hire_date) AS salary_after_two FROM Employees;

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand LEAD parameters

   LEAD(column, offset, default) lets you specify how many rows ahead to look and what to return if no row exists.

2. Step 2: Match query to requirements

   SELECT id, salary, LEAD(salary, 2, 0) OVER (ORDER BY hire_date) AS salary_after_two FROM Employees; uses offset 2 and default 0, ordered by hire_date, matching the requirement. SELECT id, salary, LEAD(salary, 0, 2) OVER (ORDER BY hire_date) AS salary_after_two FROM Employees; has wrong offset and default order. SELECT id, salary, LEAD(salary, 2) OVER (ORDER BY hire_date) AS salary_after_two FROM Employees WHERE salary_after_two IS NOT NULL; filters out NULLs instead of replacing. SELECT id, salary, LEAD(salary, 2, NULL) OVER (ORDER BY hire_date) AS salary_after_two FROM Employees; returns NULL instead of 0.

3. Final Answer:

   SELECT id, salary, LEAD(salary, 2, 0) OVER (ORDER BY hire_date) AS salary_after_two FROM Employees; -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   LEAD with offset 2 and default 0 [OK]

Hint: Use LEAD(column, offset, default) with OVER(ORDER BY ...) [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Swapping offset and default arguments
• Filtering NULL instead of setting default
• Omitting OVER clause