Sorting Data with pandas sort_values() by Single Column
📖 Scenario: You work in a small bookstore. You have a list of books with their prices. You want to see the books sorted by price to find the cheapest and most expensive ones easily.
🎯 Goal: Build a small program that creates a DataFrame of books and prices, then sorts the books by their price using pandas sort_values() method.
📋 What You'll Learn
Create a pandas DataFrame with book titles and prices
Create a variable to hold the column name to sort by
Use sort_values() to sort the DataFrame by the price column
Print the sorted DataFrame
💡 Why This Matters
🌍 Real World
Sorting data by a specific column is a common task in data analysis to organize and understand data better.
💼 Career
Data scientists and analysts often sort data to prepare reports, find trends, or clean data before deeper analysis.
Progress0 / 4 steps
1
Create the books DataFrame
Create a pandas DataFrame called books with two columns: 'Title' and 'Price'. Use these exact entries: 'The Alchemist' priced at 10.99, '1984' priced at 8.99, 'Python 101' priced at 15.50, 'Data Science' priced at 12.75.
Pandas
Hint
Use pd.DataFrame() with a dictionary where keys are column names and values are lists of data.
2
Set the column to sort by
Create a variable called sort_column and set it to the string 'Price' to specify the column to sort the DataFrame by.
Pandas
Hint
Just assign the string 'Price' to the variable sort_column.
3
Sort the DataFrame by the price column
Create a new DataFrame called sorted_books by sorting the books DataFrame using the sort_values() method with the column name stored in sort_column.
Pandas
Hint
Use books.sort_values(by=sort_column) to sort by the column stored in sort_column.
4
Print the sorted DataFrame
Print the sorted_books DataFrame to see the books sorted by price.
Pandas
Hint
Use print(sorted_books) to display the sorted DataFrame.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What does the sort_values() function do in pandas when used on a DataFrame?
easy
A. It filters rows based on a condition.
B. It changes the data type of a column.
C. It sorts the DataFrame rows based on the values in a specified column.
D. It adds a new column to the DataFrame.
Solution
Step 1: Understand the purpose of sort_values()
This function is used to reorder rows in a DataFrame based on the values in one or more columns.
Step 2: Compare with other options
Changing data types, filtering rows, or adding columns are done by different functions, not sort_values().
Final Answer:
It sorts the DataFrame rows based on the values in a specified column. -> Option C
Quick Check:
sort_values() = reorder rows by column [OK]
Hint: Remember: sort_values() orders rows by column values [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing sorting with filtering
Thinking it changes data types
Assuming it adds columns
2. Which of the following is the correct syntax to sort a DataFrame df by the column 'age' in ascending order?
easy
A. df.sort_values(by='age', ascending=True)
B. df.sort_values('age', ascending=False)
C. df.sort(by='age', ascending=True)
D. df.sort_values(by='age', ascending='yes')
Solution
Step 1: Check the correct function and parameters
The function is sort_values() and it requires the parameter by='column_name'. The ascending parameter should be a boolean.
Step 2: Validate each option
df.sort_values(by='age', ascending=True) uses correct function and parameters. df.sort_values('age', ascending=False) has ascending=False (descending). df.sort(by='age', ascending=True) uses wrong function sort(). df.sort_values(by='age', ascending='yes') uses a string instead of boolean for ascending.
Final Answer:
df.sort_values(by='age', ascending=True) -> Option A
B. The ascending parameter should be a boolean, not a string.
C. sort_values() does not accept the ascending parameter.
D. The DataFrame must be sorted inplace.
Solution
Step 1: Check the ascending parameter type
The ascending parameter expects a boolean (True or False), but here it is passed as a string 'False'.
Step 2: Validate other options
Passing column name as string is allowed. sort_values() accepts ascending. Sorting inplace is optional.
Final Answer:
The ascending parameter should be a boolean, not a string. -> Option B
Quick Check:
ascending must be True/False boolean [OK]
Hint: Use True/False, not 'True'/'False' for ascending [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Passing ascending as string
Thinking column name must be list
Forcing inplace sorting unnecessarily
5. You have a DataFrame df with columns 'product' and 'price'. You want to sort the products by price descending but keep the original DataFrame unchanged. Which code achieves this?
hard
A. df.sort_values(by='price', ascending=False, inplace=True)
B. df.sort_values('price', inplace=False)
C. df.sort_values(by='price', ascending=True)
D. sorted_df = df.sort_values(by='price', ascending=False)
Solution
Step 1: Understand sorting without changing original
To keep original DataFrame unchanged, do not use inplace=True. Instead, assign the sorted result to a new variable.
Step 2: Check options for descending order
sorted_df = df.sort_values(by='price', ascending=False) sorts by 'price' descending and assigns to sorted_df. df.sort_values(by='price', ascending=False, inplace=True) changes original due to inplace=True. df.sort_values(by='price', ascending=True) sorts ascending, not descending. df.sort_values('price', inplace=False) sorts ascending by default and does not assign result.
Final Answer:
sorted_df = df.sort_values(by='price', ascending=False) -> Option D
Quick Check:
Assign sorted result without inplace for original unchanged [OK]
Hint: Assign sorted DataFrame to new variable, avoid inplace=True [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using inplace=True and losing original order
Sorting ascending instead of descending
Not assigning sorted DataFrame to a variable
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.