What if you could find matching pairs instantly without checking every possibility?
Why Two Sum Problem Classic Hash Solution in DSA Python?
Imagine you have a list of prices for items in a store, and you want to find two items that add up to exactly the amount of money you have in your wallet.
You try checking every possible pair one by one to see if their prices add up to your money.
Checking every pair manually takes a lot of time, especially if the list is long.
You might miss pairs or repeat checks, making it slow and frustrating.
The Two Sum problem classic hash solution uses a simple helper (a hash map) to remember what prices you've seen.
This way, you can quickly check if the partner price needed to reach your total is already seen, making the search very fast and easy.
for i in range(len(nums)): for j in range(i+1, len(nums)): if nums[i] + nums[j] == target: return [i, j]
seen = {}
for i, num in enumerate(nums):
if target - num in seen:
return [seen[target - num], i]
seen[num] = iThis method lets you find pairs that add up to a target quickly, even in very large lists.
When shopping online, you want to quickly find two products that fit your budget without trying every combination.
Manual pair checking is slow and repeats work.
Using a hash map remembers seen numbers for quick lookup.
This makes finding pairs fast and efficient.
Practice
Two Sum Problem?Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem requirement
The Two Sum problem asks to find two numbers in an array that add up to a target value.Step 2: Explain the hash solution approach
Using a dictionary (hash map) allows storing each number's index and checking if the complement (target - current number) exists quickly.Final Answer:
Use a dictionary to store numbers and their indices for quick lookup -> Option AQuick Check:
Hash map lookup = fast pair finding [OK]
- Trying to sort the array which changes indices
- Using nested loops causing slow performance
- Not storing indices, only values
seen?Solution
Step 1: Recall Python dictionary membership syntax
In Python, to check if a key exists in a dictionary, use the syntaxif key in dict:.Step 2: Identify correct option
if key in seen: uses the correct syntax. if key exists in seen: and D are invalid syntax. if seen.has_key(key): is legacy and removed in Python 3.Final Answer:
if key in seen: -> Option BQuick Check:
Python dict key check = if key in dict [OK]
- Using outdated has_key() method
- Writing invalid syntax like 'exists in'
- Confusing keys with values
def two_sum(nums, target):
seen = {}
for i, num in enumerate(nums):
complement = target - num
if complement in seen:
return [seen[complement], i]
seen[num] = i
return []
print(two_sum([2, 7, 11, 15], 9))Solution
Step 1: Trace the loop and dictionary updates
Iteration 0: num=2, complement=7, seen={}, complement not in seen, add 2:0.
Iteration 1: num=7, complement=2, complement 2 in seen at index 0, return [0,1].Step 2: Determine returned indices
The function returns indices [0,1] where nums[0]+nums[1]=2+7=9.Final Answer:
[0, 1] -> Option AQuick Check:
Indices of 2 and 7 = [0, 1] [OK]
- Returning values instead of indices
- Adding current number before checking complement
- Returning empty list incorrectly
def two_sum(nums, target):
seen = {}
for i, num in enumerate(nums):
if num in seen:
return [seen[num], i]
complement = target - num
seen[complement] = i
return []Solution
Step 1: Analyze dictionary key storage
The code stores complement as key with current index, but it should store the number as key to check complement later.Step 2: Identify impact of wrong key storage
Because complement is stored as key, the lookup for num in seen fails to find correct pairs, causing wrong or no results.Final Answer:
It stores complement as key instead of the number itself -> Option CQuick Check:
Store number as key, not complement [OK]
- Swapping complement and number keys
- Returning indices before checking complement
- Not using enumerate properly
nums = [3, 3, 4, 5] and target = 6, what will the classic hash solution return?Consider the code:
def two_sum(nums, target):
seen = {}
for i, num in enumerate(nums):
complement = target - num
if complement in seen:
return [seen[complement], i]
seen[num] = i
return []
print(two_sum(nums, target))Solution
Step 1: Trace the loop with duplicates
Iteration 0: num=3, complement=3, seen={}, complement not in seen, add 3:0.
Iteration 1: num=3, complement=3, complement 3 in seen at index 0, return [0,1].Step 2: Understand duplicate handling
The solution correctly finds the two 3's at indices 0 and 1 that sum to 6.Final Answer:
[0, 1] -> Option DQuick Check:
Two 3's indices = [0, 1] [OK]
- Ignoring duplicates and returning empty list
- Returning wrong indices due to overwriting
- Assuming no pair exists when duplicates present
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown
