What is the main goal of the Reorder Linked List problem?
To rearrange a singly linked list so that nodes are ordered as: first node, last node, second node, second last node, and so on.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
Which three main steps are used to solve the Reorder Linked List problem efficiently?
1. Find the middle of the list. 2. Reverse the second half. 3. Merge the two halves alternating nodes.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
How do you find the middle node of a singly linked list?
Use two pointers: a slow pointer moving one step at a time and a fast pointer moving two steps. When fast reaches the end, slow is at the middle.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
Why do we reverse the second half of the linked list in the Reorder Linked List problem?
Reversing the second half allows easy merging from the end towards the middle, creating the required alternating order.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
What is the time complexity of the efficient Reorder Linked List solution?
O(n), where n is the number of nodes, because each step (finding middle, reversing, merging) processes nodes linearly.
Click to reveal answer
What does the 'fast' pointer do when finding the middle of a linked list?
AMoves three steps at a time
BMoves two steps at a time
CMoves one step at a time
DStays at the head
✗ Incorrect
The fast pointer moves two steps at a time to reach the end faster, helping find the middle with the slow pointer.
After finding the middle, what is the next step in the reorder process?
AReverse the second half
BReverse the first half
CMerge the halves immediately
DDelete the middle node
✗ Incorrect
The second half is reversed to prepare for merging nodes from the end towards the middle.
What is the final step in the reorder linked list algorithm?
AReverse the entire list
BSort the list
CMerge the two halves alternating nodes
DSplit the list into two separate lists
✗ Incorrect
Merging the two halves by alternating nodes creates the reordered list pattern.
Which data structure is primarily manipulated in the reorder linked list problem?
ASingly linked list
BStack
CQueue
DArray
✗ Incorrect
The problem involves rearranging nodes in a singly linked list.
What is the space complexity of the efficient reorder linked list solution?
AO(n)
BO(n^2)
CO(log n)
DO(1)
✗ Incorrect
The solution uses constant extra space by rearranging pointers in place.
Explain the three main steps to reorder a singly linked list in the required pattern.
Think about splitting, reversing, and merging the list.
You got /3 concepts.
Describe why reversing the second half of the linked list is necessary in the reorder process.
Consider how to access nodes from the tail without extra space.
You got /3 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What is the main goal of the Reorder Linked List problem?
easy
A. Remove duplicate nodes from the linked list
B. Sort the linked list in ascending order
C. Reverse the entire linked list
D. Rearrange the list so nodes alternate from start and end towards the center
Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem statement
The problem asks to reorder the list so that nodes come alternately from the start and end, like L0 -> Ln -> L1 -> Ln-1 -> L2 -> Ln-2 ...
Step 2: Differentiate from other operations
This is not sorting or reversing the entire list, but a specific pattern of rearrangement.
Final Answer:
Rearrange the list so nodes alternate from start and end towards the center -> Option D
Quick Check:
Reorder means alternate start/end nodes = A [OK]
Hint: Remember: reorder means alternate front and back nodes [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing reorder with sorting
Thinking reorder means full reversal
Assuming duplicates are removed
2. Which of the following Python code snippets correctly splits a linked list into two halves for reordering?
easy
A. slow, fast = head, head.next
while fast and fast.next:
slow = slow.next
fast = fast.next.next
second = slow.next
slow.next = null
B. slow, fast = head, head
while fast and fast.next:
slow = slow.next
fast = fast.next.next
second = slow.next
slow.next = null
C. slow, fast = head.next, head
while fast and fast.next:
slow = slow.next
fast = fast.next.next
second = slow.next
slow.next = null
D. slow, fast = head, head
while fast.next and fast.next.next:
slow = slow.next
fast = fast.next.next
second = slow.next
slow.next = null
Solution
Step 1: Understand slow and fast pointer technique
Using slow and fast pointers starting at head, fast moves twice as fast to find middle.
Step 2: Check code correctness
slow, fast = head, head
while fast and fast.next:
slow = slow.next
fast = fast.next.next
second = slow.next
slow.next = null correctly initializes both at head and uses while fast and fast.next to move pointers safely.
Final Answer:
Option B code snippet correctly splits the list into two halves -> Option B
Quick Check:
Slow and fast start at head, fast moves twice = B [OK]
Hint: Start slow and fast at head; fast moves twice as fast [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Starting fast at head.next causes off-by-one errors
Incorrect while loop conditions causing crashes
Not breaking the list by setting slow.next = null
3. What is the output linked list after reordering the list 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> null?
medium
A. 1 -> 5 -> 2 -> 4 -> 3 -> null
B. 5 -> 4 -> 3 -> 2 -> 1 -> null
C. 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> null
D. 1 -> 3 -> 5 -> 2 -> 4 -> null
Solution
Step 1: Identify the reorder pattern
Reorder means first node, last node, second node, second last node, and so on.
Step 2: Apply pattern to given list
For 1->2->3->4->5, reordered is 1->5->2->4->3.
Final Answer:
1 -> 5 -> 2 -> 4 -> 3 -> null -> Option A
Quick Check:
Alternate front and back nodes = C [OK]
Hint: Pick nodes alternately from front and back [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Reversing entire list instead of reordering
Keeping original order unchanged
Skipping nodes or mixing order
4. Given the following code snippet for reordering a linked list, what is the bug?
def reorderList(head):
if not head or not head.next:
return
slow, fast = head, head
while fast and fast.next:
slow = slow.next
fast = fast.next.next
second = slow.next
slow.next = null
prev = null
while second:
temp = second.next
second.next = prev
prev = second
second = temp
first, second = head, prev
while second:
temp1 = first.next
temp2 = second.next
first.next = second
second.next = temp1
first = temp1
second = temp2
medium
A. The function does not return the head after reordering
B. The slow pointer should start at head.next to find middle correctly
C. The while loop merging two halves should check first and second, not just second
D. The code does not handle the case when the list has only one node
Solution
Step 1: Analyze function return behavior
The function modifies the list in place but does not return anything, which is acceptable if list nodes are modified directly.
Step 2: Check if returning head is necessary
Since the list is modified in place, returning head is optional; however, if used in some contexts, returning head is safer.
Step 3: Identify actual bug
All other parts correctly find middle, reverse second half, and merge. The main issue is no return statement if function expected to return head.
Final Answer:
The function does not return the head after reordering -> Option A
Quick Check:
Missing return statement = A [OK]
Hint: Check if function returns the modified list head [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Starting slow pointer at head.next causing wrong middle
5. You have a linked list 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> 6 -> null. After applying the reorder linked list algorithm, what will be the final list? Also, explain why the middle node is chosen as it is.
hard
A. 1 -> 6 -> 2 -> 5 -> 3 -> 4 -> null; middle chosen to split list evenly
B. 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> 6 -> null; no reordering done for even length
C. 1 -> 6 -> 2 -> 5 -> 3 -> 4 -> null; middle chosen as the first of the two middle nodes
D. 1 -> 5 -> 2 -> 4 -> 3 -> 6 -> null; middle chosen as the last node
Solution
Step 1: Apply reorder pattern to even length list
For 1->2->3->4->5->6, reordered list is 1->6->2->5->3->4.
Step 2: Explain middle node choice
Using slow and fast pointers, slow stops at the first middle node (3), splitting list into two halves evenly.
Final Answer:
1 -> 6 -> 2 -> 5 -> 3 -> 4 -> null; middle chosen as the first of the two middle nodes -> Option C
Quick Check:
Even length split uses first middle node = D [OK]
Hint: For even length, slow stops at first middle node [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Choosing second middle node as split point
Not reordering even length lists
Mixing node order in final list
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.