What is the main idea behind the two-pointer approach to remove duplicates from a sorted array?
Use one pointer to track the position of unique elements and another to scan through the array. When a new unique element is found, place it at the unique pointer's position and move the pointer forward.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
Why does the two-pointer method work efficiently on a sorted array?
Because duplicates are adjacent in a sorted array, the method can easily detect duplicates by comparing current and previous elements, avoiding extra space and multiple passes.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
In the two-pointer approach, what does the 'slow' pointer represent?
The 'slow' pointer marks the position where the next unique element should be placed, effectively tracking the length of the array without duplicates.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
What is the time complexity of removing duplicates from a sorted array using the two-pointer technique?
O(n), where n is the number of elements in the array, because each element is visited at most once.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
What happens to the elements after the 'slow' pointer in the array after duplicates are removed?
They remain in the array but are not considered part of the unique elements. The array length is effectively the position of the 'slow' pointer.
Click to reveal answer
What does the 'fast' pointer do in the two-pointer approach to remove duplicates?
ASorts the array
BMarks the position of unique elements
CScans through the array to find unique elements
DDeletes duplicates directly
✗ Incorrect
The 'fast' pointer moves through the array to find unique elements by comparing with the previous element.
Why is the array required to be sorted for this two-pointer method to work correctly?
ABecause duplicates are grouped together
BBecause sorting removes duplicates automatically
CBecause the method uses hashing
DBecause the array size must be fixed
✗ Incorrect
Duplicates appear next to each other in a sorted array, making it easy to detect and skip them.
What is the final output of the two-pointer duplicate removal method?
ALength of unique elements and modified array with unique elements at the front
BSorted array with duplicates
CArray with duplicates removed and empty spaces removed
DArray reversed
✗ Incorrect
The method returns the count of unique elements and the array modified so that unique elements are at the start.
If the input array is [1,1,2], what will be the array after removing duplicates using two pointers?
A[1,2,2]
B[1,1,2]
C[2,1,_]
D[1,2,_]
✗ Incorrect
The unique elements 1 and 2 are placed at the start; the third position is ignored.
What is the space complexity of the two-pointer approach for removing duplicates from a sorted array?
AO(n)
BO(1)
CO(log n)
DO(n^2)
✗ Incorrect
The method uses constant extra space by modifying the array in place.
Explain step-by-step how the two-pointer technique removes duplicates from a sorted array.
Think about how you move through the array and keep track of unique values.
You got /6 concepts.
Describe the state of the array and pointers after processing the input [0,0,1,1,1,2,2,3,3,4] with the two-pointer method.
Visualize the array as you move pointers and place unique elements.
You got /4 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What is the main purpose of using two pointers in the Remove Duplicates from Sorted Array problem?
easy
A. To create a new array with unique elements
B. To sort the array before removing duplicates
C. To count the total number of duplicates in the array
D. To efficiently track unique elements and overwrite duplicates in-place
Solution
Step 1: Understand the two pointer roles
One pointer tracks the position to place the next unique element, the other scans the array.
Step 2: Explain in-place overwrite
When a new unique element is found, it is placed at the first pointer's position, avoiding extra space.
Final Answer:
To efficiently track unique elements and overwrite duplicates in-place -> Option D
Quick Check:
Two pointers help remove duplicates without extra space [OK]
Hint: Two pointers help overwrite duplicates without extra space [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Thinking two pointers sort the array
Assuming a new array is created
Confusing counting duplicates with removing them
2. Which of the following is the correct syntax to initialize two pointers i and j for the two-pointer approach in Python?
easy
A. i = 1; j = 0
B. i = j = 0
C. i, j = 0, 1
D. i = 0; j = 0
Solution
Step 1: Identify pointer roles
Pointer i starts at 0 (position for unique elements), j starts at 1 (scanning pointer).
Step 2: Match initialization
Correct initialization is i, j = 0, 1 to start comparing adjacent elements.
Final Answer:
i, j = 0, 1 -> Option C
Quick Check:
Start pointers at 0 and 1 for two-pointer scan [OK]
Hint: Start pointers at 0 and 1 to compare adjacent elements [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Initializing both pointers at 0
Swapping pointer start positions
Using incorrect syntax for multiple assignments
3. What will be the output of the following code snippet?
nums = [1, 1, 2, 2, 3]
i = 0
for j in range(1, len(nums)):
if nums[j] != nums[i]:
i += 1
nums[i] = nums[j]
print(nums[:i+1])
medium
A. [1, 1, 2, 3]
B. [1, 2, 3]
C. [1, 2, 2, 3]
D. [1, 1, 2, 2, 3]
Solution
Step 1: Trace the loop and pointer updates
Initially, i=0, j scans from 1 to 4. When nums[j] != nums[i], i increments and nums[i] is updated.
Step 2: Track array changes
After processing, nums becomes [1, 2, 3, 2, 3], but only first i+1=3 elements are unique.
Final Answer:
[1, 2, 3] -> Option B
Quick Check:
Unique elements extracted as [1, 2, 3] [OK]
Hint: Print slice up to i+1 for unique elements [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Printing full array instead of slice
Not updating i correctly
Confusing pointer roles
4. Identify the error in the following code snippet for removing duplicates from a sorted array:
nums = [1, 1, 2, 3, 3]
i = 0
for j in range(1, len(nums)):
if nums[i] == nums[j]:
i += 1
nums[i] = nums[j]
print(nums[:i+1])
medium
A. The condition should check if nums[j] != nums[i]
B. The pointer i should start at 1 instead of 0
C. The loop should start from j = 0
D. The print statement should print the entire array
Solution
Step 1: Analyze the if condition
The code increments i and updates nums[i] only when nums[i] == nums[j], which is incorrect for removing duplicates.
Step 2: Correct the condition
It should increment i and update nums[i] when nums[j] != nums[i] to keep unique elements.
Final Answer:
The condition should check if nums[j] != nums[i] -> Option A
Quick Check:
Use != to detect new unique elements [OK]
Hint: Use != to find unique elements, not == [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using == instead of !=
Starting pointers incorrectly
Printing wrong slice of array
5. Given a sorted array nums = [0,0,1,1,1,2,2,3,3,4], what will be the array state after applying the two-pointer method to remove duplicates in-place?
hard
A. [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
B. [0, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
C. [0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 4]
D. [0, 1, 2, 2, 3, 4]
Solution
Step 1: Apply two-pointer logic on nums
Start with i=0, j scans from 1 to end. Each time nums[j] != nums[i], increment i and set nums[i] = nums[j].
Step 2: Track unique elements placement
Unique elements placed at start: 0,1,2,3,4. The array's first 5 elements become [0,1,2,3,4].
Final Answer:
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4] -> Option A
Quick Check:
Unique sorted elements remain at front [OK]
Hint: Unique elements stay at front after two-pointer overwrite [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Assuming duplicates remain in front
Not updating i correctly
Confusing array slicing after operation
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.