Push Operation on Stack in DSA Python - Time & Space Complexity
We want to understand how the time to add an item to a stack changes as the stack grows.
How does the push operation behave when the stack size increases?
Analyze the time complexity of the following code snippet.
class Stack:
def __init__(self):
self.items = []
def push(self, item):
self.items.append(item)
This code adds an item to the top of the stack using a list's append method.
Identify the loops, recursion, array traversals that repeat.
- Primary operation: Adding one item to the end of the list (stack).
- How many times: Each push adds exactly one item, no loops or recursion involved.
Adding one item takes the same amount of time no matter how many items are already in the stack.
| Input Size (n) | Approx. Operations |
|---|---|
| 10 | 1 |
| 100 | 1 |
| 1000 | 1 |
Pattern observation: The time stays constant as the stack grows.
Time Complexity: O(1)
This means adding an item to the stack takes the same short time no matter how big the stack is.
[X] Wrong: "Push takes longer as the stack grows because it has to move all items."
[OK] Correct: The push just adds to the end of the list without moving existing items, so time stays the same.
Knowing push is very fast helps you explain why stacks are great for quick add/remove tasks in real programs.
"What if the stack was implemented using a linked list instead of a list? How would the time complexity of push change?"
Practice
push operation do in a stack?Solution
Step 1: Understand stack behavior
A stack follows Last In First Out (LIFO) principle, so new elements are added on top.Step 2: Define push operation
Push means adding a new element on the top of the stack.Final Answer:
Adds an element to the top of the stack -> Option DQuick Check:
Push = Add top element [OK]
- Confusing push with pop operation
- Thinking push removes elements
- Mixing stack with queue operations
5 into a stack named stack implemented as a Python list?Solution
Step 1: Recall Python list methods for stack
Python lists useappend()to add elements at the end, which acts as top of stack.Step 2: Check each option
push()andadd()are not list methods;insert(0, 5)adds at bottom, not top.Final Answer:
stack.append(5) -> Option AQuick Check:
Use append() to push in Python list stack [OK]
- Using push() which is not a Python list method
- Using insert(0, value) which adds at bottom
- Confusing add() with append()
stack = [] stack.append(10) stack.append(20) stack.append(30)
Solution
Step 1: Trace each append operation
Start with empty list. Append 10 -> [10], append 20 -> [10, 20], append 30 -> [10, 20, 30].Step 2: Understand stack order
Elements are added at the end; top is last element (30).Final Answer:
[10, 20, 30] -> Option CQuick Check:
Stack after pushes = [10, 20, 30] [OK]
- Reversing the order of elements
- Confusing stack top with bottom
- Assuming append adds at start
15 into a stack implemented as a list:stack = [5, 10] stack.push(15)
Solution
Step 1: Check list methods for adding elements
Python lists do not have apush()method; they useappend().Step 2: Analyze the code error
Callingstack.push(15)will cause an AttributeError because push is undefined.Final Answer:
Using push() method which does not exist for list -> Option BQuick Check:
List has append(), not push() [OK]
- Assuming push() exists for Python lists
- Thinking stack must be tuple
- Ignoring AttributeError on push()
[1, 2, 3] onto the stack so that 3 is on top after all pushes?Solution
Step 1: Understand stack push order
To have 3 on top, push 1 first, then 2, then 3 so 3 is last pushed.Step 2: Analyze each option
Loop append in order 1,2,3 puts 3 on top. Reverse order puts 1 on top. extend(reversed([1,2,3])) adds 3,2,1 so 1 on top. Insert at index 0 in order ends with [3,2,1], 1 on top.Final Answer:
Use a loop to append elements in order: 1, then 2, then 3 -> Option AQuick Check:
Push in order to get last element on top [OK]
- Pushing in reverse order causing wrong top
- Using insert(0, val) which adds at bottom
- Using extend(reversed([1, 2, 3])) which puts wrong order on top
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown
