Bird
Raised Fist0
DSA Pythonprogramming~10 mins

Creating a Singly Linked List from Scratch in DSA Python - Code Step by Step

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Practice - 5 Tasks
Answer the questions below
1fill in blank
easy

Complete the code to define a Node class with a constructor that initializes the data and next pointer.

DSA Python
class Node:
    def __init__(self, data):
        self.data = data
        self.[1] = None
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Aprev
Bnext
Chead
Dvalue
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using 'prev' which is for doubly linked lists.
Using 'head' which is a pointer for the list, not the node.
Using 'value' which is not a standard pointer name.
2fill in blank
medium

Complete the code to initialize the head of the linked list to None in the LinkedList class constructor.

DSA Python
class LinkedList:
    def __init__(self):
        self.[1] = None
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Adata
Btail
Chead
Dnext
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using 'tail' which points to the end, not the start.
Using 'next' which belongs to nodes, not the list.
Using 'data' which is node content, not a pointer.
3fill in blank
hard

Fix the error in the append method to correctly add a new node at the end of the linked list.

DSA Python
def append(self, data):
    new_node = Node(data)
    if self.head is None:
        self.head = new_node
    else:
        last = self.head
        while last.[1] is not None:
            last = last.next
        last.next = new_node
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Anext
Bprev
Chead
Ddata
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using 'prev' which is not defined in singly linked lists.
Using 'head' which is the start of the list, not the next node.
Using 'data' which is the node's content, not a pointer.
4fill in blank
hard

Fill both blanks to create a method that prints all node data in the linked list.

DSA Python
def print_list(self):
    current = self.head
    while current is not None:
        print(current.[1])
        current = current.[2]
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Adata
Bnext
Chead
Dprev
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Trying to print 'next' instead of 'data'.
Using 'prev' which does not exist in singly linked lists.
Using 'head' which is the start pointer, not a node attribute.
5fill in blank
hard

Fill all three blanks to create a method that counts the number of nodes in the linked list.

DSA Python
def length(self):
    count = 0
    current = self.[1]
    while current is not None:
        count [2]= 1
        current = current.[3]
    return count
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Ahead
B+
Cnext
Ddata
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Starting from 'tail' which is not defined.
Using '=' instead of '+=' which overwrites count.
Using 'data' instead of 'next' to move forward.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What is the main purpose of a Singly Linked List in data structures?
easy
A. To store elements with keys and values for fast lookup
B. To store elements in a sequence where each element points to the next
C. To store elements in a sorted array for binary search
D. To store elements in a tree structure with parent and child nodes

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the structure of a singly linked list

    A singly linked list stores elements in nodes where each node points to the next node, forming a chain.
  2. Step 2: Compare with other data structures

    Unlike arrays or trees, singly linked lists do not store keys or have parent-child relationships; they only link sequentially.
  3. Final Answer:

    To store elements in a sequence where each element points to the next -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Singly Linked List = sequence with next pointers [OK]
Hint: Remember: singly linked list nodes point only forward [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing linked lists with arrays or hash maps
  • Thinking nodes have backward pointers (that's doubly linked list)
  • Assuming linked lists store key-value pairs
2. Which of the following is the correct way to define a node class for a singly linked list in Python?
easy
A. class Node: def __init__(self, data, next): self.data = data self.next = next self.prev = None
B. class Node: def __init__(self, data): self.data = data self.prev = None
C. class Node: def __init__(self, data): self.data = data self.next = None
D. class Node: def __init__(self): self.data = None self.next = None self.prev = None

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify the correct attributes for a singly linked list node

    A singly linked list node stores data and a pointer to the next node only, so it needs data and next.
  2. Step 2: Check the constructor parameters and attributes

    class Node: def __init__(self, data): self.data = data self.next = None correctly initializes data and sets next to None by default. Other options include prev which is for doubly linked lists or incorrect parameters.
  3. Final Answer:

    class Node: def __init__(self, data): self.data = data self.next = None -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Node has data and next only [OK]
Hint: Singly linked list nodes have no 'prev' pointer [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Adding a 'prev' pointer by mistake
  • Not initializing 'next' to None
  • Using extra parameters unnecessarily
3. What will be the output of the following code that creates a singly linked list with nodes 10, 20, 30 and prints the list?
class Node:
    def __init__(self, data):
        self.data = data
        self.next = None

class LinkedList:
    def __init__(self):
        self.head = None

    def append(self, data):
        new_node = Node(data)
        if not self.head:
            self.head = new_node
            return
        last = self.head
        while last.next:
            last = last.next
        last.next = new_node

    def print_list(self):
        current = self.head
        while current:
            print(current.data, end=' -> ')
            current = current.next
        print('None')

ll = LinkedList()
ll.append(10)
ll.append(20)
ll.append(30)
ll.print_list()
medium
A. 10 -> 20 -> None
B. 30 -> 20 -> 10 -> None
C. None
D. 10 -> 20 -> 30 -> None

Solution

  1. Step 1: Trace the append method calls

    Appending 10 sets head to node with data 10. Then 20 and 30 are added at the end by traversing the list.
  2. Step 2: Trace the print_list method

    Prints nodes in order: 10, then 20, then 30, each followed by ' -> ', ending with 'None'.
  3. Final Answer:

    10 -> 20 -> 30 -> None -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Append adds at end, print shows order [OK]
Hint: Append adds nodes at list end; print shows order [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Assuming append adds at front
  • Printing without 'None' at end
  • Confusing order of nodes
4. The following code tries to append nodes to a singly linked list but does not work as expected. What is the error?
class Node:
    def __init__(self, data):
        self.data = data
        self.next = None

class LinkedList:
    def __init__(self):
        self.head = None

    def append(self, data):
        new_node = Node(data)
        if self.head is None:
            self.head = new_node
        else:
            last = self.head
            while last.next:
                last = last.next
            last = new_node

ll = LinkedList()
ll.append(1)
ll.append(2)
ll.append(3)

current = ll.head
while current:
    print(current.data, end=' -> ')
    current = current.next
print('None')
medium
A. The line 'last = new_node' does not link the new node to the list
B. The head is never initialized
C. The Node class is missing the 'prev' pointer
D. The while loop condition should be 'while last is not None'

Solution

  1. Step 1: Analyze the append method's else block

    The code finds the last node correctly but then does 'last = new_node' which only changes the local variable, not the last node's next pointer.
  2. Step 2: Identify the fix

    To link the new node, it should be 'last.next = new_node' to update the last node's next pointer.
  3. Final Answer:

    The line 'last = new_node' does not link the new node to the list -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Assign to last.next to link nodes [OK]
Hint: Update last.next, not last variable, to link nodes [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Assigning new_node to last instead of last.next
  • Not updating the head when list is empty
  • Confusing variable assignment with pointer update
5. You want to create a singly linked list from scratch that supports inserting a new node at the beginning and printing the list. Which code snippet correctly implements this?
hard
A. class Node: def __init__(self, data): self.data = data self.next = None class LinkedList: def __init__(self): self.head = None def insert_at_beginning(self, data): new_node = Node(data) new_node.next = self.head self.head = new_node def print_list(self): current = self.head while current: print(current.data, end=' -> ') current = current.next print('None')
B. class Node: def __init__(self, data): self.data = data self.prev = None self.next = None class LinkedList: def __init__(self): self.head = None def insert_at_beginning(self, data): new_node = Node(data) new_node.prev = self.head self.head = new_node def print_list(self): current = self.head while current: print(current.data, end=' -> ') current = current.next print('None')
C. class Node: def __init__(self, data): self.data = data self.next = None class LinkedList: def __init__(self): self.head = None def insert_at_beginning(self, data): new_node = Node(data) self.head = new_node def print_list(self): current = self.head while current: print(current.data, end=' -> ') current = current.next print('None')
D. class Node: def __init__(self, data): self.data = data self.next = None class LinkedList: def __init__(self): self.head = None def insert_at_beginning(self, data): new_node = Node(data) new_node.next = None self.head = new_node def print_list(self): current = self.head while current: print(current.data, end=' -> ') current = current.next print('None')

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand insert at beginning logic

    To insert at the beginning, new node's next should point to current head, then head updated to new node.
  2. Step 2: Check each option's insert_at_beginning method

    class Node: def __init__(self, data): self.data = data self.next = None class LinkedList: def __init__(self): self.head = None def insert_at_beginning(self, data): new_node = Node(data) new_node.next = self.head self.head = new_node def print_list(self): current = self.head while current: print(current.data, end=' -> ') current = current.next print('None') correctly sets new_node.next = self.head and updates head. class Node: def __init__(self, data): self.data = data self.prev = None self.next = None class LinkedList: def __init__(self): self.head = None def insert_at_beginning(self, data): new_node = Node(data) new_node.prev = self.head self.head = new_node def print_list(self): current = self.head while current: print(current.data, end=' -> ') current = current.next print('None') wrongly uses prev pointer. class Node: def __init__(self, data): self.data = data self.next = None class LinkedList: def __init__(self): self.head = None def insert_at_beginning(self, data): new_node = Node(data) self.head = new_node def print_list(self): current = self.head while current: print(current.data, end=' -> ') current = current.next print('None') misses linking new_node.next. class Node: def __init__(self, data): self.data = data self.next = None class LinkedList: def __init__(self): self.head = None def insert_at_beginning(self, data): new_node = Node(data) new_node.next = None self.head = new_node def print_list(self): current = self.head while current: print(current.data, end=' -> ') current = current.next print('None') sets new_node.next to None, losing old list.
  3. Final Answer:

    Option A code snippet correctly inserts at beginning and prints list -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    New node points to old head, then head updated [OK]
Hint: New node's next = old head; update head to new node [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Not linking new node to old head
  • Using prev pointer in singly linked list
  • Setting new_node.next to None incorrectly
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard