Bird
Raised Fist0
DSA C++programming~20 mins

Radix Sort Algorithm in DSA C++ - Practice Problems & Challenges

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Challenge - 5 Problems
🎖️
Radix Sort Mastery
Get all challenges correct to earn this badge!
Test your skills under time pressure!
❓ Predict Output
intermediate
2:00remaining
Output of Radix Sort on a small array
What is the output of the following C++ code after applying Radix Sort on the array?
DSA C++
void countingSort(int arr[], int n, int exp) {
    int output[n];
    int count[10] = {0};
    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
        count[(arr[i] / exp) % 10]++;
    for (int i = 1; i < 10; i++)
        count[i] += count[i - 1];
    for (int i = n - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
        output[count[(arr[i] / exp) % 10] - 1] = arr[i];
        count[(arr[i] / exp) % 10]--;
    }
    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
        arr[i] = output[i];
}

void radixSort(int arr[], int n) {
    int maxVal = arr[0];
    for (int i = 1; i < n; i++)
        if (arr[i] > maxVal) maxVal = arr[i];
    for (int exp = 1; maxVal / exp > 0; exp *= 10)
        countingSort(arr, n, exp);
}

int main() {
    int arr[] = {170, 45, 75, 90, 802, 24, 2, 66};
    int n = sizeof(arr) / sizeof(arr[0]);
    radixSort(arr, n);
    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
        std::cout << arr[i] << " ";
    return 0;
}
A802 170 90 75 66 45 24 2
B2 24 45 66 75 90 170 802
C2 24 45 66 75 170 90 802
D170 45 75 90 802 24 2 66
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Radix sort sorts numbers digit by digit starting from least significant digit.
❓ Predict Output
intermediate
2:00remaining
Radix Sort output with numbers having different digit lengths
What will be the output of the following code after applying Radix Sort on the array?
DSA C++
int arr[] = {3, 300, 34, 5, 9};
int n = sizeof(arr) / sizeof(arr[0]);
radixSort(arr, n);
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
    std::cout << arr[i] << " ";
A3 5 9 34 300
B300 34 9 5 3
C3 34 5 9 300
D5 3 9 34 300
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Radix sort handles numbers with different digit lengths by sorting from least significant digit.
🧠 Conceptual
advanced
1:30remaining
Why Radix Sort is not comparison-based?
Which statement best explains why Radix Sort is not a comparison-based sorting algorithm?
AIt sorts numbers by grouping digits and using counting sort without direct element comparisons.
BIt sorts numbers by comparing each pair of elements multiple times.
CIt uses quicksort internally to sort digits of numbers.
DIt compares elements only once and then sorts them using a heap.
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Think about how Radix Sort processes digits instead of comparing whole numbers.
🔧 Debug
advanced
2:00remaining
Identify the bug in this Radix Sort counting sort implementation
What error will this code cause when running countingSort in Radix Sort?
DSA C++
void countingSort(int arr[], int n, int exp) {
    int output[n];
    int count[10] = {0};
    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
        count[(arr[i] / exp) % 10]++;
    for (int i = 1; i < 10; i++)
        count[i] += count[i - 1];
    for (int i = n - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
        output[count[(arr[i] / exp) % 10] - 1] = arr[i];
        count[(arr[i] / exp) % 10]--;
    }
    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
        arr[i] = output[i];
}
ALogical error causing reversed sorted array
BNo error, code runs correctly
CCompilation error due to missing semicolon
DArray index out of bounds error due to incorrect loop limit in count array update
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Check the loop that updates the count array prefix sums.
🚀 Application
expert
2:30remaining
Radix Sort on strings of digits
Given an array of strings representing numbers with equal length digits, which approach correctly sorts them using Radix Sort?
ASort strings from leftmost character to rightmost using counting sort on each character
BSort strings lexicographically using built-in sort only
CSort strings from rightmost character to leftmost using counting sort on each character
DConvert strings to integers and apply quicksort
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Radix Sort processes digits starting from least significant digit.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What is the main idea behind the Radix Sort algorithm?
easy
A. Sort numbers digit by digit starting from the least significant digit
B. Compare each element with every other element and swap if needed
C. Divide the array into halves and sort each half recursively
D. Use a pivot element to partition the array and sort partitions

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand Radix Sort approach

    Radix Sort sorts numbers by processing individual digits starting from the least significant digit (rightmost) to the most significant digit (leftmost).
  2. Step 2: Compare with other sorting methods

    Other options describe Bubble Sort, Merge Sort, and Quick Sort, which are different algorithms.
  3. Final Answer:

    Sort numbers digit by digit starting from the least significant digit -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Radix Sort = Digit by digit sorting [OK]
Hint: Radix Sort processes digits from right to left [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing Radix Sort with comparison-based sorts
  • Thinking it sorts from most significant digit first
  • Assuming it uses swapping of elements
2. Which of the following is the correct way to extract the digit at position pos (starting from 0 for least significant digit) from an integer num in C++?
easy
A. (num / (10 * pos)) % 10
B. ((num / (int)pow(10, pos)) % 10)
C. (num % (10 * pos)) / 10
D. (num % pow(10, pos)) / 10

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand digit extraction formula

    To get the digit at position pos, divide num by 10^pos and then take modulo 10.
  2. Step 2: Check each option

    ((num / (int)pow(10, pos)) % 10 correctly uses pow(10, pos) for exponentiation and modulo 10 to get the digit.
  3. Final Answer:

    ((num / (int)pow(10, pos)) % 10) -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Digit extraction = (num / 10^pos) % 10 [OK]
Hint: Divide by 10^pos then mod 10 to get digit [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using multiplication instead of exponentiation
  • Incorrect order of operations
  • Using modulo before division
3. What will be the output of the following C++ code snippet using Radix Sort on array arr = {170, 45, 75, 90, 802, 24, 2, 66}?
void countingSort(int arr[], int n, int exp) {
    int output[n];
    int count[10] = {0};
    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
        count[(arr[i] / exp) % 10]++;
    for (int i = 1; i < 10; i++)
        count[i] += count[i - 1];
    for (int i = n - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
        output[count[(arr[i] / exp) % 10] - 1] = arr[i];
        count[(arr[i] / exp) % 10]--;
    }
    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
        arr[i] = output[i];
}

void radixSort(int arr[], int n) {
    int maxVal = *max_element(arr, arr + n);
    for (int exp = 1; maxVal / exp > 0; exp *= 10)
        countingSort(arr, n, exp);
}

int main() {
    int arr[] = {170, 45, 75, 90, 802, 24, 2, 66};
    int n = sizeof(arr) / sizeof(arr[0]);
    radixSort(arr, n);
    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
        cout << arr[i] << " ";
    return 0;
}
medium
A. 24 2 45 66 75 90 170 802
B. 802 170 90 75 66 45 24 2
C. 2 24 45 66 75 90 170 802
D. 2 24 45 75 66 90 170 802

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand Radix Sort steps on given array

    Radix Sort sorts by digits: first units, then tens, then hundreds. After full sorting, array becomes sorted ascending.
  2. Step 2: Trace final sorted array

    Sorted array is: 2 24 45 66 75 90 170 802.
  3. Final Answer:

    2 24 45 66 75 90 170 802 -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Radix Sort final output = sorted array ascending [OK]
Hint: Radix Sort outputs fully sorted array ascending [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing intermediate steps with final output
  • Misordering numbers with same digits
  • Ignoring stable sorting in countingSort
4. Identify the bug in the following Radix Sort counting sort implementation and select the correct fix:
void countingSort(int arr[], int n, int exp) {
    int output[n];
    int count[10] = {0};
    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
        count[(arr[i] / exp) % 10]++;
    for (int i = 1; i < 10; i++)
        count[i] += count[i - 1];
    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
        output[count[(arr[i] / exp) % 10] - 1] = arr[i];
        count[(arr[i] / exp) % 10]--;
    }
    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
        arr[i] = output[i];
}
medium
A. Change the last for loop to iterate from n-1 down to 0 for stable sorting
B. Initialize count array with -1 instead of 0
C. Remove the cumulative sum loop for count array
D. Replace output array with a vector for dynamic sizing

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify stable sorting requirement in counting sort

    Counting sort must process elements from right to left to maintain stability.
  2. Step 2: Check the for loop direction

    Current loop goes from 0 to n-1, which breaks stability. Changing it to n-1 down to 0 fixes this.
  3. Final Answer:

    Change the last for loop to iterate from n-1 down to 0 for stable sorting -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Stable counting sort = reverse iteration [OK]
Hint: Counting sort must iterate backward for stability [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Iterating forward breaks stable sorting
  • Misunderstanding count array initialization
  • Ignoring cumulative sum step
5. Given an array of strings representing numbers with leading zeros, e.g., {"002", "010", "001", "100"}, how can you adapt Radix Sort to correctly sort them as numbers?
hard
A. Use counting sort only on the first character of each string
B. Sort strings lexicographically using Radix Sort on characters
C. Ignore leading zeros and sort strings as-is with Radix Sort
D. Convert strings to integers first, then apply Radix Sort on integers

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand sorting numeric strings with leading zeros

    Sorting strings lexicographically will not sort numbers correctly if leading zeros exist.
  2. Step 2: Convert strings to integers for numeric sorting

    Convert strings to integers to remove leading zeros, then apply Radix Sort on integers for correct numeric order.
  3. Final Answer:

    Convert strings to integers first, then apply Radix Sort on integers -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Numeric string sorting = convert to int then Radix Sort [OK]
Hint: Convert strings to int before Radix Sort for numeric order [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Sorting strings lexicographically causes wrong order
  • Ignoring leading zeros impact
  • Using only first character for sorting
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard