0
0
DSA Typescriptprogramming~10 mins

Palindrome Partitioning DP Minimum Cuts in DSA Typescript - Execution Trace

Choose your learning style9 modes available
Concept Flow - Palindrome Partitioning DP Minimum Cuts
Start with full string
Check all substrings palindrome?
If substring is palindrome
No cut needed for this substring
Else try all cuts
Calculate min cuts using DP
Store min cuts for substring
Move to next substring
Repeat until full string processed
Return min cuts for full string
We check all substrings to find palindromes, then use dynamic programming to find the minimum cuts needed to partition the string into palindromes.
Execution Sample
DSA Typescript
const minCut = (s: string): number => {
  const n = s.length;
  const dp = Array(n).fill(0);
  const palindrome = Array.from({ length: n }, () => Array(n).fill(false));
  for (let end = 0; end < n; end++) {
    let minCuts = end;
    for (let start = 0; start <= end; start++) {
      if (s[start] === s[end] && (end - start < 2 || palindrome[start + 1][end - 1])) {
        palindrome[start][end] = true;
        minCuts = start === 0 ? 0 : Math.min(minCuts, dp[start - 1] + 1);
      }
    }
    dp[end] = minCuts;
  }
  return dp[n - 1];
};
This code finds the minimum cuts needed to partition the string into palindromes using dynamic programming.
Execution Table
StepOperationSubstring CheckedPalindrome?dp Array StateminCutsVisual State
1Check substring s[0..0]"a"True[0, _, _, _, _]0"a" is palindrome, dp[0]=0
2Check substring s[0..1]"ab"False[0, 1, _, _, _]1"ab" not palindrome, dp[1]=1
3Check substring s[1..1]"b"True[0, 1, _, _, _]1"b" palindrome, dp[1]=min(1, dp[0]+1=1) =1
4Check substring s[0..2]"aba"True[0, 1, 0, _, _]0"aba" palindrome, dp[2]=0
5Check substring s[1..2]"ba"False[0, 1, 0, _, _]1"ba" not palindrome
6Check substring s[2..2]"a"True[0, 1, 0, _, _]0"a" palindrome
7Check substring s[0..3]"abac"False[0, 1, 0, 1, _]1"abac" not palindrome, dp[3]=min(3, dp[2]+1=1) =1
8Check substring s[1..3]"bac"False[0, 1, 0, 1, _]2"bac" not palindrome
9Check substring s[2..3]"ac"False[0, 1, 0, 1, _]2"ac" not palindrome
10Check substring s[3..3]"c"True[0, 1, 0, 1, _]1"c" palindrome
11Check substring s[0..4]"abacd"False[0, 1, 0, 1, 2]2"abacd" not palindrome, dp[4]=min(4, dp[3]+1=2) =2
12Check substring s[1..4]"bacd"False[0, 1, 0, 1, 2]3"bacd" not palindrome
13Check substring s[2..4]"acd"False[0, 1, 0, 1, 2]3"acd" not palindrome
14Check substring s[3..4]"cd"False[0, 1, 0, 1, 2]3"cd" not palindrome
15Check substring s[4..4]"d"True[0, 1, 0, 1, 2]2"d" palindrome
16End--[0, 1, 0, 1, 2]-Minimum cuts for full string is dp[n-1]=2
💡 All substrings checked, dp array filled, minimum cuts found at dp[n-1]
Variable Tracker
VariableStartAfter Step 1After Step 4After Step 7After Step 11Final
dp[_, _, _, _, _][0, _, _, _, _][0, 1, 0, _, _][0, 1, 0, 1, _][0, 1, 0, 1, 2][0, 1, 0, 1, 2]
palindromeAll falsepalindrome[0][0]=truepalindrome[0][2]=truepalindrome[0][2]=true, palindrome[3][3]=truepalindrome[4][4]=truepalindrome matrix updated accordingly
minCutsn/a00122
Key Moments - 3 Insights
Why do we set minCuts to 'start === 0 ? 0 : dp[start - 1] + 1' when a palindrome substring is found?
Because if the palindrome substring starts at index 0, no cuts are needed before it (minCuts=0). Otherwise, we add 1 cut after the previous substring's minimum cuts (dp[start - 1] + 1). See execution_table rows 4 and 7.
Why do we check 'end - start < 2 || palindrome[start + 1][end - 1]' to confirm a palindrome?
Because substrings of length 1 or 2 are palindrome if characters match. For longer substrings, the inner substring must also be palindrome. This ensures correct palindrome detection. See execution_table rows 1 and 4.
Why does dp[end] store the minimum cuts needed for substring s[0..end]?
dp[end] accumulates the minimum cuts needed to partition the substring from start to end into palindromes. It updates as we find better partitions. See variable_tracker dp values and execution_table dp Array State.
Visual Quiz - 3 Questions
Test your understanding
Look at the execution_table at Step 4, what is the value of dp[2] after checking substring "aba"?
A1
B2
C0
D3
💡 Hint
Check the dp Array State column at Step 4 in execution_table
At which step does the dp array first get the value 1 for any index?
AStep 2
BStep 7
CStep 1
DStep 11
💡 Hint
Look at dp Array State column in execution_table rows 1 and 2
If the input string was "aaaa", how would the dp array change compared to the current execution?
Adp would increase by 1 at each step
Bdp would be all zeros because every substring is palindrome
Cdp would be the same as current
Ddp would be all ones
💡 Hint
Consider palindrome substrings and dp updates in variable_tracker and execution_table
Concept Snapshot
Palindrome Partitioning Minimum Cuts:
- Use DP array dp[n], dp[i] = min cuts for s[0..i]
- Use palindrome table to check substrings
- If s[start..end] palindrome, dp[end] = min(dp[end], dp[start-1]+1)
- If palindrome starts at 0, dp[end] = 0
- Result is dp[n-1]
Full Transcript
This visualization shows how to find the minimum cuts needed to partition a string into palindromes using dynamic programming. We check every substring to see if it is a palindrome using a 2D boolean table. For each end index, we try all start indices to find palindrome substrings. If a substring is palindrome, we update the dp array with the minimum cuts needed. The dp array stores the minimum cuts needed for the substring from the start to the current end index. The final answer is dp[n-1]. The execution table traces each substring check, palindrome detection, dp updates, and the visual state of the dp array. The variable tracker shows how dp and palindrome tables change over time. Key moments clarify why we add cuts only after previous partitions and how palindrome checks work. The quiz tests understanding of dp values and palindrome logic. This method efficiently computes minimum palindrome partition cuts.