Palindrome Partitioning DP Minimum Cuts in DSA Typescript - Time & Space Complexity
We want to know how the time needed to find the minimum cuts for palindrome partitioning changes as the input string gets longer.
Specifically, how the number of steps grows when checking all possible partitions and palindromes.
Analyze the time complexity of the following code snippet.
function minCut(s: string): number {
const n = s.length;
const dp = new Array(n).fill(0);
const palindrome = Array.from({ length: n }, () => new Array(n).fill(false));
for (let end = 0; end < n; end++) {
let minCuts = end;
for (let start = 0; start <= end; start++) {
if (s[start] === s[end] && (end - start < 2 || palindrome[start + 1][end - 1])) {
palindrome[start][end] = true;
minCuts = start === 0 ? 0 : Math.min(minCuts, dp[start - 1] + 1);
}
}
dp[end] = minCuts;
}
return dp[n - 1];
}
This code finds the minimum number of cuts needed to split a string into palindromes using dynamic programming.
Identify the loops, recursion, array traversals that repeat.
- Primary operation: Nested loops checking all substring pairs (start, end) and palindrome checks.
- How many times: Outer loop runs n times; inner loop runs up to n times for each outer loop, totaling about n×n = n² times.
As the string length grows, the number of substring checks grows roughly with the square of the length.
| Input Size (n) | Approx. Operations |
|---|---|
| 10 | About 100 checks |
| 100 | About 10,000 checks |
| 1000 | About 1,000,000 checks |
Pattern observation: The work grows roughly by the square of the input size, so doubling the input makes the work about four times bigger.
Time Complexity: O(n²)
This means the time needed grows roughly with the square of the string length, because we check all substring pairs.
[X] Wrong: "Since we only loop once over the string, the time is O(n)."
[OK] Correct: We actually have a nested loop checking all substrings, so the time grows much faster than just one pass.
Understanding this time complexity helps you explain how dynamic programming reduces repeated work when checking palindromes, a common pattern in coding challenges.
"What if we used a simple recursive approach without memoization? How would the time complexity change?"
Practice
s?Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem goal
The problem asks for the fewest cuts needed to split the string into parts where each part is a palindrome.Step 2: Clarify what minimum cuts mean
Minimum cuts means the smallest number of splits to make all parts palindromes.Final Answer:
The minimum number of cuts needed to partitionsinto palindromic substrings -> Option AQuick Check:
Minimum cuts = minimum splits for palindrome parts [OK]
- Confusing minimum cuts with longest palindrome substring
- Counting total palindrome substrings instead of cuts
- Thinking about maximum palindrome length
s?Solution
Step 1: Identify input and output types
Input is a strings, output is a number representing minimum cuts.Step 2: Match correct signature
Onlyfunction minCut(s: string): numbermatches input string and numeric output.Final Answer:
function minCut(s: string): number -> Option CQuick Check:
Input string, output number for cuts [OK]
- Using wrong input type like number or boolean
- Returning array or string instead of number
- Mixing input and output types
"aab"?
function minCut(s: string): number {
const n = s.length;
const dp = new Array(n).fill(0);
const palindrome = Array.from({ length: n }, () => new Array(n).fill(false));
for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) {
let minCuts = i;
for (let j = 0; j <= i; j++) {
if (s[j] === s[i] && (i - j < 2 || palindrome[j + 1][i - 1])) {
palindrome[j][i] = true;
minCuts = j === 0 ? 0 : Math.min(minCuts, dp[j - 1] + 1);
}
}
dp[i] = minCuts;
}
return dp[n - 1];
}
console.log(minCut("aab"));Solution
Step 1: Trace palindrome checks for "aab"
Substrings: "a" (palindrome), "aa" (palindrome), "b" (palindrome). Minimum cuts for "aab" is 1 (cut between "aa" and "b").Step 2: Check dp array updates
dp[0]=0 ("a"), dp[1]=0 ("aa"), dp[2]=1 (cut before "b").Final Answer:
1 -> Option BQuick Check:
Minimum cuts for "aab" = 1 [OK]
- Assuming no cuts needed for "aab"
- Counting total palindromes instead of cuts
- Incorrect dp index updates
function minCut(s: string): number {
const n = s.length;
const dp = new Array(n).fill(0);
const palindrome = Array.from({ length: n }, () => new Array(n).fill(false));
for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) {
dp[i] = i;
for (let j = 0; j <= i; j++) {
if (s[j] === s[i] && (i - j < 2 || palindrome[j + 1][i - 1])) {
palindrome[j][i] = true;
dp[i] = Math.min(dp[i], dp[j - 1] + 1);
}
}
}
return dp[n - 1];
}Solution
Step 1: Analyze dp update logic
When substring s[j..i] is palindrome, dp[i] should consider dp[j-1] + 1 cuts, not dp[j] + 1.Step 2: Identify correct index for dp
dp[j-1] represents cuts before substring start; dp[j] is incorrect and causes off-by-one error.Final Answer:
dp[j] should be dp[j - 1] when updating dp[i] -> Option DQuick Check:
Use dp[j-1] for correct minimum cuts [OK]
- Using dp[j] instead of dp[j-1]
- Incorrect loop bounds causing missed palindromes
- Wrong initialization of dp array
"abccbc", what is the minimum number of cuts needed to partition it into palindromic substrings using the DP approach?Solution
Step 1: Identify palindromic substrings in "abccbc"
Palindromes include "a", "b", "cc", "bcb", "c". Partitioning as "a" | "bccb" | "c" is possible with 2 cuts.Step 2: Calculate minimum cuts
Minimum cuts = 2 because splitting into "a" | "bccb" | "c" yields all palindromes with 2 cuts.Final Answer:
2 -> Option AQuick Check:
Minimum cuts for "abccbc" = 2 [OK]
- Assuming 0 cuts because string is not fully palindrome
- Counting each character as separate palindrome causing more cuts
- Missing palindrome "bccb" in middle
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown
