We want to find the smallest number of train platforms needed so that no train waits. We do this by checking how many trains overlap in time.
Analogy: Imagine a parking lot where cars arrive and leave at different times. The minimum number of parking spots needed is the maximum number of cars parked at the same time.
Trains arrive after all others depart (no overlap)
Platforms needed is 1
DSA Typescript
if (arrivals[i] < departures[j])
When to Use This Pattern
When you see overlapping time intervals and need to find the maximum overlap, use the two-pointer approach on sorted start and end times to find the minimum resources needed.
Common Mistakes
Mistake: Not sorting arrival and departure times before processing Fix: Sort both arrays to ensure correct order of events
Mistake: Using <= instead of < in comparison, causing incorrect platform count Fix: Use strictly less than (<) to count arrivals before departures
Summary
Calculates the minimum number of platforms needed so no train waits by counting overlapping train times.
Use when scheduling resources that must handle overlapping intervals without delay.
Sort arrival and departure times separately and use two pointers to track overlaps efficiently.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What does the "Minimum Number of Platforms" problem ask you to find given train arrival and departure times?
easy
A. The total time trains spend on the platform
B. The total number of trains arriving in a day
C. The maximum speed of trains on the platform
D. The least number of platforms needed so no train waits
Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem goal
The problem asks for the minimum number of platforms required so that no train has to wait for another to leave.
Step 2: Clarify what is being counted
We count overlapping train schedules to find the peak number of trains at the station simultaneously.
Final Answer:
The least number of platforms needed so no train waits -> Option D
Quick Check:
Minimum platforms = max trains overlapping [OK]
Hint: Count overlapping trains to find minimum platforms needed [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing total trains with platforms needed
Ignoring overlapping times
Counting total arrival or departure times only
2. Which of the following TypeScript code snippets correctly sorts an array of train arrival times stored as numbers?
easy
A. arrivals.sort();
B. arrivals.sort((a, b) => a - b);
C. arrivals.sort((a, b) => b - a);
D. arrivals.sort((a, b) => a + b);
Solution
Step 1: Understand sorting numbers in TypeScript
Default sort() treats elements as strings, so numeric sort needs a compare function.
Step 2: Identify correct compare function
The function (a, b) => a - b sorts numbers in ascending order correctly.
Final Answer:
arrivals.sort((a, b) => a - b); -> Option B
Quick Check:
Numeric ascending sort uses (a, b) => a - b [OK]
Hint: Use (a, b) => a - b to sort numbers ascending [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using sort() without compare function for numbers
Using (a, b) => a + b which is invalid
Sorting descending when ascending needed
3. Given arrival times [900, 940, 950, 1100, 1500, 1800] and departure times [910, 1200, 1120, 1130, 1900, 2000], what is the minimum number of platforms needed?
Hint: Track arrivals and departures to find max overlap [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Not sorting times before processing
Counting total trains instead of overlaps
Mixing arrival and departure times
4. The following TypeScript code tries to find the minimum number of platforms but has a bug. What is the bug?
function findPlatforms(arrivals: number[], departures: number[]): number {
arrivals.sort((a, b) => a - b);
departures.sort((a, b) => a - b);
let platformNeeded = 1, maxPlatforms = 1;
let i = 1, j = 0;
while (i < arrivals.length && j < departures.length) {
if (arrivals[i] <= departures[j]) {
platformNeeded++;
i++;
} else {
platformNeeded--;
j++;
}
if (platformNeeded > maxPlatforms) maxPlatforms = platformNeeded;
}
return maxPlatforms;
}
medium
A. Start i from 0 instead of 1 to include first arrival
B. Use < instead of <= in comparison to avoid counting overlaps wrongly
C. Initialize platformNeeded to 0 instead of 1
D. Sort arrivals and departures in descending order
Solution
Step 1: Analyze loop initialization
Variable i starts at 1, skipping the first arrival time, which causes missing counting the first train.
Step 2: Correct initialization for accurate counting
Starting i at 0 ensures all arrivals are considered, giving correct platform count.
Final Answer:
Start i from 0 instead of 1 to include first arrival -> Option A
Quick Check:
Include all arrivals by starting i=0 [OK]
Hint: Start pointers at 0 to include all trains [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Skipping first arrival by starting i at 1
Changing comparison operator incorrectly
Initializing platformNeeded wrongly
5. You have trains arriving and departing as follows:
Arrivals: [1000, 1010, 1025, 1030, 1040]
Departures: [1015, 1020, 1035, 1045, 1050]
If you want to minimize the number of platforms by rescheduling trains without changing their arrival order, which train's departure time should you delay to reduce platform count?
hard
A. Delay the departure of train arriving at 1010
B. Delay the departure of train arriving at 1000
C. Delay the departure of train arriving at 1040
D. Delay the departure of train arriving at 1025
Solution
Step 1: Identify overlapping trains causing max platforms
Trains at 1010 and 1025 overlap because 1010 departs at 1020 and 1025 arrives before that.
Step 2: Delay departure of train at 1010 to after 1025 departs
Delaying 1010's departure reduces overlap with 1025, lowering platform need.
Final Answer:
Delay the departure of train arriving at 1010 -> Option A
Quick Check:
Delay overlapping train's departure to reduce platforms [OK]
Hint: Delay departure of earliest overlapping train to reduce platforms [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Delaying wrong train's departure
Changing arrival order which is fixed
Ignoring overlap timing details
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.