We need 10 separate arrays (buckets) for digits 0-9. Using Array.from with a function creates independent arrays.
Step 2: Why other options fail
const buckets = new Array(10).fill([]); fills with the same array reference, causing all buckets to share one array. const buckets = [].map(() => []); fails because map on empty array does nothing. const buckets = Array(10).fill(null); fills with null, not arrays.
4. Identify the bug in this Radix Sort snippet and choose the correct fix:
function radixSort(arr) {
let maxDigit = Math.floor(Math.log10(Math.max(...arr))) + 1;
for (let k = 0; k <= maxDigit; k++) {
let buckets = Array.from({ length: 10 }, () => []);
for (let num of arr) {
buckets[Math.floor(num / Math.pow(10, k)) % 10].push(num);
}
arr = [].concat(...buckets);
}
return arr;
}
medium
A. Change loop condition to k < maxDigit instead of <= maxDigit
B. Initialize buckets with new Array(10).fill([])
C. Use Math.ceil instead of Math.floor for maxDigit
D. Remove Math.abs from digit calculation
Solution
Step 1: Analyze loop range for digit passes
The loop runs from 0 to maxDigit inclusive, causing one extra pass beyond needed digits.
Step 2: Fix loop condition
Changing k <= maxDigit to k < maxDigit ensures exactly maxDigit passes, avoiding unnecessary iteration.
Final Answer:
Change loop condition to k < maxDigit instead of <= maxDigit -> Option A
Quick Check:
Loop runs maxDigit times, not maxDigit+1 [OK]
Hint: Loop digits from 0 to less than maxDigit [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using <= causes extra unnecessary pass
Initializing buckets incorrectly with shared arrays
Changing floor to ceil breaks digit count
5. You want to use Radix Sort to sort an array containing both positive and negative integers, like [170, -45, 75, -90, 802, 24, -2, 66]. Which approach correctly adapts Radix Sort for this case?
hard
A. Separate negative and positive numbers, sort positives with Radix Sort, sort negatives by absolute value then reverse, then combine
B. Apply Radix Sort directly on all numbers including negatives without changes
C. Convert all numbers to strings and sort lexicographically
D. Use Radix Sort only on positive numbers and ignore negatives
Solution
Step 1: Understand Radix Sort limitation
Radix Sort works only on non-negative integers because it sorts digits from least significant to most significant.
Step 2: Adapt for negatives
Separate negatives and positives. Sort positives normally. For negatives, sort their absolute values, then reverse the result to get correct order. Finally, combine negatives (in reversed order) before positives.
Final Answer:
Separate negative and positive numbers, sort positives with Radix Sort, sort negatives by absolute value then reverse, then combine -> Option A
Quick Check:
Separate negatives and positives, sort separately [OK]
Hint: Sort negatives by absolute then reverse, positives normally [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Trying to sort negatives directly with Radix Sort
Ignoring negative numbers in sorting
Sorting numbers as strings causing wrong order
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.