Search in Rotated Sorted Array in DSA Java - Practice Problems & Challenges

Challenge - 5 Problems

❓ Predict Output

intermediate

Output of search in rotated sorted array

What is the output of the following Java code that searches for a target in a rotated sorted array?

DSA Java

public class Solution {
    public static int search(int[] nums, int target) {
        int left = 0, right = nums.length - 1;
        while (left <= right) {
            int mid = left + (right - left) / 2;
            if (nums[mid] == target) return mid;
            if (nums[left] <= nums[mid]) {
                if (nums[left] <= target && target < nums[mid]) right = mid - 1;
                else left = mid + 1;
            } else {
                if (nums[mid] < target && target <= nums[right]) left = mid + 1;
                else right = mid - 1;
            }
        }
        return -1;
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        int[] nums = {4,5,6,7,0,1,2};
        System.out.println(search(nums, 0));
    }
}

A 6

B 0

C 4

D -1

💡 Hint

Think about how the array is rotated and where the target 0 is located.

The target 0 is at index 4 in the rotated array. The binary search correctly finds it and returns 4.

❓ Predict Output

intermediate

Output when target is not present

What will be the output of the following code when searching for target 3 in the rotated sorted array?

DSA Java

public class Solution {
    public static int search(int[] nums, int target) {
        int left = 0, right = nums.length - 1;
        while (left <= right) {
            int mid = left + (right - left) / 2;
            if (nums[mid] == target) return mid;
            if (nums[left] <= nums[mid]) {
                if (nums[left] <= target && target < nums[mid]) right = mid - 1;
                else left = mid + 1;
            } else {
                if (nums[mid] < target && target <= nums[right]) left = mid + 1;
                else right = mid - 1;
            }
        }
        return -1;
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        int[] nums = {4,5,6,7,0,1,2};
        System.out.println(search(nums, 3));
    }
}

A -1

B 3

C 0

D 6

💡 Hint

Check if the target 3 exists in the array.

The target 3 is not present in the array, so the function returns -1.

🔧 Debug

advanced

Identify the error in the search method

What error will occur when running this code to search in a rotated sorted array?

DSA Java

public class Solution {
    public static int search(int[] nums, int target) {
        int left = 0, right = nums.length - 1;
        while (left < right) {
            int mid = left + (right - left) / 2;
            if (nums[mid] == target) return mid;
            if (nums[left] <= nums[mid]) {
                if (nums[left] <= target && target < nums[mid]) right = mid - 1;
                else left = mid + 1;
            } else {
                if (nums[mid] < target && target <= nums[right]) left = mid + 1;
                else right = mid - 1;
            }
        }
        return -1;
    }
}

A No error, works correctly

B Returns incorrect index

C ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException

D Infinite loop

💡 Hint

Check the loop condition and how left and right pointers move.

The loop condition 'left < right' fails to check the element when left == right, causing the function to return -1 even when the target is present at that position.

🧠 Conceptual

advanced

Why does binary search work on rotated sorted arrays?

Which statement best explains why binary search can be adapted to work on rotated sorted arrays?

A Because the rotation does not affect the order of elements.

B Because the array elements are all unique, so binary search works directly.

C Because the array is fully sorted, so normal binary search applies.

D Because at least one half of the array is always sorted, allowing us to decide which half to search.

💡 Hint

Think about how the array is split during the search.

In a rotated sorted array, one half is always sorted, so we can check which half to continue searching.

❓ Predict Output

expert

Output of search with duplicates in rotated array

What is the output of the following code searching for target 2 in a rotated sorted array with duplicates?

DSA Java

public class Solution {
    public static int search(int[] nums, int target) {
        int left = 0, right = nums.length - 1;
        while (left <= right) {
            int mid = left + (right - left) / 2;
            if (nums[mid] == target) return mid;
            if (nums[left] == nums[mid] && nums[mid] == nums[right]) {
                left++;
                right--;
            } else if (nums[left] <= nums[mid]) {
                if (nums[left] <= target && target < nums[mid]) right = mid - 1;
                else left = mid + 1;
            } else {
                if (nums[mid] < target && target <= nums[right]) left = mid + 1;
                else right = mid - 1;
            }
        }
        return -1;
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        int[] nums = {2,2,3,4,2,2};
        System.out.println(search(nums, 2));
    }
}

A 0

B 3

C -1

D 5

💡 Hint

Duplicates can cause multiple valid indices; the code returns the first found.

The code returns index 0 because it finds the target 2 at the first occurrence during the search.

Practice

1. What is the main challenge when searching for an element in a rotated sorted array compared to a normal sorted array?

easy

A. The array elements are all negative numbers.

B. The array contains duplicate elements which confuse the search.

C. The array is not fully sorted, so normal binary search cannot be directly applied.

D. The array size is unknown, so we cannot set search boundaries.

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand normal binary search assumption

   Binary search works efficiently only if the array is fully sorted in ascending or descending order.

2. Step 2: Identify the effect of rotation

   Rotation breaks the full sorted order, splitting the array into two sorted parts, so normal binary search fails without modification.

3. Final Answer:

   The array is not fully sorted, so normal binary search cannot be directly applied. -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Rotated array breaks full sort = normal binary search fails [OK]

Hint: Rotation breaks full sort; adjust binary search accordingly [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Assuming array is fully sorted and applying normal binary search
• Ignoring rotation and searching linearly
• Confusing rotation with duplicates

2. Which of the following is the correct Java method signature to implement binary search in a rotated sorted array?

easy

A. int search(int nums[], target)

B. public int search(int[] nums, int target)

C. public void search(int[] nums, int target)

D. int search(int[] nums, int target, int start, int end)

Solution

1. Step 1: Check Java method signature conventions

   Java methods must specify access modifier, return type, method name, and parameter types with names.

2. Step 2: Analyze each option

   public int search(int[] nums, int target) correctly declares a public method returning int with parameters int[] and int. int search(int nums[], target) misses return type and parameter type for target. public void search(int[] nums, int target) returns void but search should return index. int search(int[] nums, int target, int start, int end) has extra parameters but no access modifier.

3. Final Answer:

   public int search(int[] nums, int target) -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Correct Java method signature = public int search(int[] nums, int target) [OK]

Hint: Java method needs return type and parameter types correctly [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Omitting return type
• Missing parameter types
• Using void instead of int return type

3. What will be the output of the following Java code snippet?

public class RotatedSearch {
    public static int search(int[] nums, int target) {
        int left = 0, right = nums.length - 1;
        while (left <= right) {
            int mid = left + (right - left) / 2;
            if (nums[mid] == target) return mid;
            if (nums[left] <= nums[mid]) {
                if (nums[left] <= target && target < nums[mid]) right = mid - 1;
                else left = mid + 1;
            } else {
                if (nums[mid] < target && target <= nums[right]) left = mid + 1;
                else right = mid - 1;
            }
        }
        return -1;
    }
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        int[] arr = {4,5,6,7,0,1,2};
        System.out.println(search(arr, 0));
    }
}

medium

A. 4

B. 0

C. -1

D. 6

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the array and target

   The array is rotated sorted: [4,5,6,7,0,1,2]. Target is 0, which is at index 4.

2. Step 2: Trace the binary search steps

   Initial left=0, right=6, mid=3 (value 7). Left half is sorted (4 to 7). Target 0 is not in left half, so move left=mid+1=4. Now left=4, right=6, mid=5 (value 1). Right half is sorted (1 to 2). Target 0 is less than nums[mid], so move right=mid-1=4. Now left=4, right=4, mid=4 (value 0). Found target at index 4.

3. Final Answer:

   4 -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Target 0 found at index 4 [OK]

Hint: Check which half is sorted to decide search direction [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Not updating left/right correctly
• Confusing indices after rotation
• Returning wrong index or -1 incorrectly

4. Identify the bug in the following Java method for searching in a rotated sorted array:

public int search(int[] nums, int target) {
    int left = 0, right = nums.length - 1;
    while (left < right) {
        int mid = left + (right - left) / 2;
        if (nums[mid] == target) return mid;
        if (nums[left] <= nums[mid]) {
            if (nums[left] <= target && target < nums[mid]) right = mid - 1;
            else left = mid + 1;
        } else {
            if (nums[mid] < target && target <= nums[right]) left = mid + 1;
            else right = mid - 1;
        }
    }
    return -1;
}

medium

A. The loop condition should be 'left <= right' instead of 'left < right'.

B. The mid calculation is incorrect and may cause overflow.

C. The method should return void instead of int.

D. The array should be sorted before searching.

Solution

1. Step 1: Analyze loop condition

   The loop uses 'while (left < right)', which misses the case when left == right, possibly skipping the last element check.

2. Step 2: Correct loop condition for binary search

   Binary search requires 'while (left <= right)' to ensure all elements are checked, including when left equals right.

3. Final Answer:

   The loop condition should be 'left <= right' instead of 'left < right'. -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Loop must include equality to check all elements [OK]

Hint: Use 'left <= right' in binary search loops [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using 'left < right' and missing last element
• Incorrect mid calculation causing overflow
• Returning wrong type or ignoring array rotation

5. Given a rotated sorted array with possible duplicates, which modification is needed in the binary search algorithm to correctly find the target?

hard

A. Ignore duplicates and apply normal rotated binary search

B. Use linear search instead of binary search

C. Sort the array before searching

D. Skip duplicates by incrementing left when nums[left] == nums[mid] == nums[right]

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand duplicates effect on rotated binary search

   Duplicates can make it unclear which half is sorted because nums[left], nums[mid], and nums[right] may be equal.

2. Step 2: Modify search to handle duplicates

   When nums[left] == nums[mid] == nums[right], increment left by 1 to skip duplicates and reduce search space safely.

3. Final Answer:

   Skip duplicates by incrementing left when nums[left] == nums[mid] == nums[right] -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Skip duplicates to maintain binary search correctness [OK]

Hint: Skip duplicates when ends equal to avoid confusion [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Ignoring duplicates causing infinite loops
• Switching to linear search unnecessarily
• Sorting array breaks problem constraints