Find Minimum in Rotated Sorted Array in DSA Java - Cheat Sheet & Quick Revision

Recall & Review

beginner

What is a rotated sorted array?

A rotated sorted array is an array that was originally sorted in ascending order but then rotated (shifted) at some pivot point. For example, [4,5,6,7,0,1,2] is a rotated version of [0,1,2,4,5,6,7].

beginner

Why can't we just scan the entire rotated sorted array to find the minimum?

Scanning the entire array takes O(n) time, which is slow for large arrays. Using a smart approach like binary search can find the minimum in O(log n) time.

intermediate

What is the key idea behind using binary search to find the minimum in a rotated sorted array?

We compare the middle element with the rightmost element to decide which half contains the minimum. If middle is greater than right, minimum is in the right half; else, it's in the left half.

intermediate

What is the stopping condition in the binary search for finding the minimum in a rotated sorted array?

When the search space reduces to one element, that element is the minimum.

intermediate

Show the Java code snippet to find the minimum in a rotated sorted array using binary search.

public int findMin(int[] nums) { int left = 0, right = nums.length - 1; while (left < right) { int mid = left + (right - left) / 2; if (nums[mid] > nums[right]) { left = mid + 1; } else { right = mid; } } return nums[left]; }

What does a rotated sorted array look like?

A [4,5,6,7,0,1,2]

B [7,6,5,4,3,2,1]

C [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]

D [2,4,6,8,10]

A rotated sorted array is a sorted array shifted at some pivot, like [4,5,6,7,0,1,2].

What is the time complexity of finding minimum by scanning all elements?

A O(n)

B O(log n)

C O(n log n)

D O(1)

Scanning all elements takes O(n) time.

In binary search for minimum, if nums[mid] > nums[right], where is the minimum?

A Left half

B Right half

C At mid

D Cannot determine

If nums[mid] > nums[right], minimum is in the right half.

When does the binary search stop in this problem?

A When left > right

B When mid == right

C After fixed number of steps

D When left == right

Binary search stops when left equals right, pointing to minimum.

What does the function return after binary search completes?

A nums[mid]

B nums[right]

C nums[left]

D nums[0]

After search, left points to the minimum element.

Explain how binary search helps find the minimum in a rotated sorted array.

Think about how the array is split and where the smallest value lies.

Write the steps to find the minimum element in a rotated sorted array without scanning all elements.

Use binary search logic focusing on comparisons with the rightmost element.

Practice

1. What is the main goal when finding the minimum in a rotated sorted array?

easy

A. To find the largest element in the array

B. To find the smallest element after the rotation point

C. To count the number of rotations

D. To sort the array again

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the rotated sorted array

   A rotated sorted array is a sorted array shifted at some pivot. The smallest element is the rotation point.

2. Step 2: Identify the minimum element

   The minimum element is the smallest value after the rotation, which is the point where the order breaks.

3. Final Answer:

   To find the smallest element after the rotation point -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Minimum element = smallest after rotation [OK]

Hint: Look for the point where order breaks to find minimum [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing minimum with maximum element
• Trying to count rotations instead of finding minimum
• Assuming array is fully sorted without rotation

2. Which Java syntax correctly declares a method to find the minimum in a rotated sorted array?

easy

A. public int findMin(int[] nums) {}

B. int findMin(int nums) {}

C. void findMin(int[] nums) {}

D. public static findMin(int[] nums) {}

Solution

1. Step 1: Check method return type and parameters

   The method should return an int (the minimum value) and accept an int array parameter.

2. Step 2: Validate Java method syntax

   public int findMin(int[] nums) {} uses 'public int findMin(int[] nums) {}' which is correct Java syntax for this method.

3. Final Answer:

   public int findMin(int[] nums) {} -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Correct method signature = public int findMin(int[] nums) {} [OK]

Hint: Method must return int and accept int array parameter [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Missing return type or using void incorrectly
• Incorrect parameter syntax
• Missing access modifier or static keyword incorrectly

3. What is the output of the following code snippet?

int[] nums = {4,5,6,7,0,1,2};
System.out.println(findMin(nums));

public static int findMin(int[] nums) {
    int left = 0, right = nums.length - 1;
    while (left < right) {
        int mid = left + (right - left) / 2;
        if (nums[mid] > nums[right]) {
            left = mid + 1;
        } else {
            right = mid;
        }
    }
    return nums[left];
}

medium

A. 2

B. 4

C. 7

D. 0

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the binary search logic

   The code uses binary search to find the minimum by comparing middle and right elements, narrowing the search space.

2. Step 2: Trace the loop with given array

   Array: [4,5,6,7,0,1,2] - mid=3 (value 7), 7 > 2, so left = mid+1 = 4 - left=4, right=6 - mid=5 (value 1), 1 <= 2, so right = mid = 5 - left=4, right=5 - mid=4 (value 0), 0 <= 1, so right = mid = 4 Loop ends when left == right == 4, nums[4] = 0.

3. Final Answer:

   0 -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Minimum element found = 0 [OK]

Hint: Compare mid and right to narrow search for minimum [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Returning nums[mid] instead of nums[left]
• Confusing comparison direction in binary search
• Not updating left or right correctly

4. Identify the error in this code snippet for finding minimum in rotated sorted array:

public static int findMin(int[] nums) {
    int left = 0, right = nums.length - 1;
    while (left <= right) {
        int mid = left + (right - left) / 2;
        if (nums[mid] > nums[right]) {
            left = mid + 1;
        } else {
            right = mid;
        }
    }
    return nums[left];
}

medium

A. The return statement should be 'nums[right]'

B. The mid calculation is incorrect

C. The loop condition should be 'left < right' instead of 'left <= right'

D. The array should be sorted before searching

Solution

1. Step 1: Analyze the loop condition

   The loop uses 'left <= right', which can cause infinite loop or index errors because left can go beyond right.

2. Step 2: Correct the loop condition

   Changing the condition to 'left < right' ensures the loop stops when left meets right, correctly identifying the minimum index.

3. Final Answer:

   The loop condition should be 'left < right' instead of 'left <= right' -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Loop condition must be 'left < right' [OK]

Hint: Use 'left < right' to avoid infinite loops in binary search [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using 'left <= right' causing infinite loops
• Incorrectly adjusting right pointer
• Returning wrong array element after loop

5. Given a rotated sorted array that may contain duplicates, which modification is needed in the binary search to find the minimum correctly?

int[] nums = {2,2,2,0,1,2};

hard

A. Add a condition to reduce right by one when nums[mid] equals nums[right]

B. Ignore duplicates and proceed as usual

C. Sort the array before searching

D. Use linear search instead of binary search

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the effect of duplicates

   Duplicates can cause ambiguity when nums[mid] equals nums[right], making it unclear which side to search.

2. Step 2: Modify binary search to handle duplicates

   When nums[mid] == nums[right], reduce right by one to shrink search space safely without missing minimum.

3. Final Answer:

   Add a condition to reduce right by one when nums[mid] equals nums[right] -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Handle duplicates by shrinking right pointer [OK]

Hint: When equal, reduce right pointer to handle duplicates [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Ignoring duplicates causing wrong minimum
• Sorting array which is inefficient
• Switching to linear search unnecessarily