Top K Frequent Elements Using Heap in DSA Go - Time & Space Complexity
We want to know how the time needed grows when finding the top K frequent elements using a heap.
How does the work change as the input list gets bigger?
Analyze the time complexity of the following code snippet.
func topKFrequent(nums []int, k int) []int {
freqMap := make(map[int]int)
for _, num := range nums {
freqMap[num]++
}
h := &IntHeap{}
heap.Init(h)
for num, freq := range freqMap {
heap.Push(h, Pair{num, freq})
if h.Len() > k {
heap.Pop(h)
}
}
res := make([]int, 0, k)
for h.Len() > 0 {
res = append(res, heap.Pop(h).(Pair).num)
}
return res
}
// Pair and IntHeap types omitted for brevity
This code counts frequencies, then uses a min-heap to keep only the top K frequent elements.
Identify the loops, recursion, array traversals that repeat.
- Primary operation: Loop over all numbers to count frequencies, then loop over unique numbers to push/pop in heap.
- How many times: Counting loop runs n times (n = length of input), heap operations run m times (m = number of unique elements).
As input size n grows, counting frequencies takes about n steps. Then, heap operations depend on m, the unique count.
| Input Size (n) | Approx. Operations |
|---|---|
| 10 | ~10 counting + ~10 heap ops |
| 100 | ~100 counting + ~100 heap ops |
| 1000 | ~1000 counting + ~1000 heap ops |
Pattern observation: Counting grows linearly with n, heap operations grow with unique elements m, usually less than n.
Time Complexity: O(n + m log k)
This means the time grows linearly with input size n for counting, and heap operations depend on m and k, keeping it efficient.
[X] Wrong: "Heap operations run n times, so time is O(n log n)."
[OK] Correct: Heap size is limited to k, so each push/pop is O(log k), not O(log n), making it faster.
Understanding how to use heaps to keep top K items efficiently is a valuable skill that shows you can handle large data smartly.
"What if we used a max-heap for all elements and then popped k times? How would the time complexity change?"
Practice
Top K Frequent Elements Using Heap algorithm?Solution
Step 1: Understand the role of heap in frequency tracking
A heap helps keep track of elements based on their frequency efficiently, especially when we want only the top K frequent elements.Step 2: Compare with other options
Sorting all elements or removing duplicates is not the main goal here; the heap is used for efficient frequency comparison and retrieval.Final Answer:
To efficiently find and keep track of the top K frequent elements -> Option AQuick Check:
Heap usage = Efficient top K tracking [OK]
- Thinking heap sorts all elements fully
- Confusing heap with simple list storage
- Assuming heap removes duplicates
Solution
Step 1: Understand Go heap initialization
In Go, a heap is usually implemented by defining a type that implements heap.Interface, then initializing it with heap.Init(&heap).Step 2: Analyze options
var h IntHeap; heap.Init(&h) correctly declares a variable of type IntHeap and initializes it by passing its address to heap.Init. Other options misuse pointers or heap methods.Final Answer:
var h IntHeap; heap.Init(&h) -> Option DQuick Check:
Correct heap init = var h IntHeap; heap.Init(&h) [OK]
- Calling heap.Init on non-pointer
- Using make for heap without type
- Incorrect pointer usage with new([]int)
nums := []int{1,1,1,2,2,3}
result := topKFrequent(nums, 2)
fmt.Println(result)
Assuming topKFrequent is correctly implemented using a min-heap.Solution
Step 1: Count frequencies of elements
1 appears 3 times, 2 appears 2 times, 3 appears 1 time.Step 2: Extract top 2 frequent elements
The top 2 frequent elements are 1 (3 times) and 2 (2 times). So the result is [1, 2].Final Answer:
[1, 2] -> Option CQuick Check:
Top 2 frequent = [1, 2] [OK]
- Confusing element order in output
- Including less frequent elements
- Ignoring frequency counts
func topKFrequent(nums []int, k int) []int {
freqMap := make(map[int]int)
for _, num := range nums {
freqMap[num]++
}
h := &IntHeap{}
heap.Init(h)
for num, freq := range freqMap {
heap.Push(h, Pair{freq, num})
if h.Len() > k {
heap.Pop(h)
}
}
res := make([]int, 0, k)
for h.Len() > 0 {
p := heap.Pop(h).(Pair)
res = append(res, p.num)
}
return res
}Solution
Step 1: Understand heap usage and result order
The min-heap keeps smallest frequency on top, so popping elements gives ascending frequency order.Step 2: Identify output order issue
Appending popped elements directly results in ascending order, but top K frequent elements should be in descending order of frequency.Final Answer:
Result list is in ascending frequency order, needs reversing -> Option AQuick Check:
Output order issue = Result list is in ascending frequency order, needs reversing [OK]
- Ignoring output order of popped elements
- Not initializing heap properly
- Incorrect frequency counting
Top K Frequent Elements Using Heap algorithm be adapted to return the top K elements sorted by frequency and then by element value ascending when frequencies tie?Solution
Step 1: Understand tie-breaking requirement
When frequencies tie, elements should be ordered by their value ascending to maintain consistent order.Step 2: Adapt heap comparison logic
Implement a custom comparison in the heap that compares frequency first, and if equal, compares element values ascending.Final Answer:
Use a heap with custom comparison: first by frequency, then by element value ascending -> Option BQuick Check:
Custom heap comparison handles ties correctly [OK]
- Ignoring tie-breaker in heap comparison
- Sorting entire list unnecessarily
- Using max-heap without tie-break logic
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown
