Bird
Raised Fist0
DSA Goprogramming~20 mins

Top K Frequent Elements Using Heap in DSA Go - Practice Problems & Challenges

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Challenge - 5 Problems
🎖️
Heap Mastery: Top K Frequent Elements
Get all challenges correct to earn this badge!
Test your skills under time pressure!
❓ Predict Output
intermediate
2:00remaining
Output of Top K Frequent Elements with Min-Heap
What is the output of the following Go code that finds the top 2 frequent elements using a min-heap?
DSA Go
package main

import (
	"container/heap"
	"fmt"
)

type Element struct {
	value int
	freq  int
}

type MinHeap []Element

func (h MinHeap) Len() int           { return len(h) }
func (h MinHeap) Less(i, j int) bool { return h[i].freq < h[j].freq }
func (h MinHeap) Swap(i, j int)      { h[i], h[j] = h[j], h[i] }

func (h *MinHeap) Push(x interface{}) {
	*h = append(*h, x.(Element))
}

func (h *MinHeap) Pop() interface{} {
	n := len(*h)
	el := (*h)[n-1]
	*h = (*h)[:n-1]
	return el
}

func topKFrequent(nums []int, k int) []int {
	freqMap := make(map[int]int)
	for _, num := range nums {
		freqMap[num]++
	}

	h := &MinHeap{}
	heap.Init(h)

	for val, freq := range freqMap {
		heap.Push(h, Element{val, freq})
		if h.Len() > k {
			heap.Pop(h)
		}
	}

	res := make([]int, 0, k)
	for h.Len() > 0 {
		res = append(res, heap.Pop(h).(Element).value)
	}
	return res
}

func main() {
	nums := []int{1,1,1,2,2,3}
	k := 2
	result := topKFrequent(nums, k)
	fmt.Println(result)
}
A[1, 2]
B[2, 1]
C[3, 2]
D[1, 3]
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Remember that the min-heap pops the smallest frequency first, so the final slice is built by popping from smallest to largest frequency.
🧠 Conceptual
intermediate
1:30remaining
Understanding Heap Usage in Top K Frequent Elements
Why is a min-heap used instead of a max-heap to find the top k frequent elements efficiently?
ABecause a min-heap sorts elements in descending order automatically.
BBecause a min-heap stores elements in increasing order of their values, not frequency.
CBecause a max-heap cannot be implemented efficiently in Go.
DBecause a min-heap keeps the smallest frequency at the top, allowing easy removal of less frequent elements when size exceeds k.
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Think about how to maintain only the top k frequent elements while processing all frequencies.
🔧 Debug
advanced
2:00remaining
Identify the Error in Heap Implementation
What error will occur when running this Go code snippet that implements a min-heap for top k frequent elements?
DSA Go
type MinHeap []Element

func (h MinHeap) Len() int           { return len(h) }
func (h MinHeap) Less(i, j int) bool { return h[i].freq > h[j].freq }
func (h MinHeap) Swap(i, j int)      { h[i], h[j] = h[j], h[i] }
AThe heap will behave as a max-heap, not a min-heap, causing incorrect top k results.
BSyntax error due to missing pointer receiver in methods.
CRuntime panic due to index out of range in Swap method.
DNo error; code works correctly as min-heap.
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Check the Less method logic carefully.
❓ Predict Output
advanced
2:00remaining
Output of Top K Frequent Elements with Equal Frequencies
What is the output of this Go code when multiple elements have the same frequency?
DSA Go
package main

import (
	"container/heap"
	"fmt"
)

type Element struct {
	value int
	freq  int
}

type MinHeap []Element

func (h MinHeap) Len() int           { return len(h) }
func (h MinHeap) Less(i, j int) bool {
	if h[i].freq == h[j].freq {
		return h[i].value > h[j].value
	}
	return h[i].freq < h[j].freq
}
func (h MinHeap) Swap(i, j int)      { h[i], h[j] = h[j], h[i] }

func (h *MinHeap) Push(x interface{}) {
	*h = append(*h, x.(Element))
}

func (h *MinHeap) Pop() interface{} {
	n := len(*h)
	el := (*h)[n-1]
	*h = (*h)[:n-1]
	return el
}

func topKFrequent(nums []int, k int) []int {
	freqMap := make(map[int]int)
	for _, num := range nums {
		freqMap[num]++
	}

	h := &MinHeap{}
	heap.Init(h)

	for val, freq := range freqMap {
		heap.Push(h, Element{val, freq})
		if h.Len() > k {
			heap.Pop(h)
		}
	}

	res := make([]int, 0, k)
	for h.Len() > 0 {
		res = append(res, heap.Pop(h).(Element).value)
	}
	return res
}

func main() {
	nums := []int{4,4,1,1,2,2,3}
	k := 3
	result := topKFrequent(nums, k)
	fmt.Println(result)
}
A[3, 4, 1]
B[1, 2, 3]
C[3, 2, 1]
D[4, 3, 2]
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
When frequencies tie, the element with larger value is considered smaller in heap order.
🚀 Application
expert
2:30remaining
Optimizing Top K Frequent Elements for Large Data
You have a very large list of integers and want to find the top 5 frequent elements efficiently. Which approach is best to optimize memory and speed?
AUse a hash map to count frequencies, then a min-heap of size 5 to keep top elements while iterating over the map.
BSort the entire list and then count frequencies by scanning, finally pick top 5 elements.
CUse a max-heap containing all unique elements and pop top 5 elements after building it.
DUse a balanced binary search tree to store frequencies and extract top 5 elements.
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Consider both time and space complexity for large input.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What is the main purpose of using a heap in the Top K Frequent Elements Using Heap algorithm?
easy
A. To efficiently find and keep track of the top K frequent elements
B. To sort all elements in ascending order
C. To store elements without any order
D. To remove duplicates from the list

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the role of heap in frequency tracking

    A heap helps keep track of elements based on their frequency efficiently, especially when we want only the top K frequent elements.
  2. Step 2: Compare with other options

    Sorting all elements or removing duplicates is not the main goal here; the heap is used for efficient frequency comparison and retrieval.
  3. Final Answer:

    To efficiently find and keep track of the top K frequent elements -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Heap usage = Efficient top K tracking [OK]
Hint: Heap keeps top K frequent elements efficiently [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Thinking heap sorts all elements fully
  • Confusing heap with simple list storage
  • Assuming heap removes duplicates
2. Which of the following Go code snippets correctly initializes a min-heap to store pairs of (frequency, element) for the top K frequent elements problem?
easy
A. heap := new([]int); heap.Init(heap)
B. heap := make([]int, 0); heap.Push(heap, pair)
C. heap := &IntHeap{}; heap.Init(heap)
D. var h IntHeap; heap.Init(&h)

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand Go heap initialization

    In Go, a heap is usually implemented by defining a type that implements heap.Interface, then initializing it with heap.Init(&heap).
  2. Step 2: Analyze options

    var h IntHeap; heap.Init(&h) correctly declares a variable of type IntHeap and initializes it by passing its address to heap.Init. Other options misuse pointers or heap methods.
  3. Final Answer:

    var h IntHeap; heap.Init(&h) -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Correct heap init = var h IntHeap; heap.Init(&h) [OK]
Hint: Use heap.Init with pointer to heap variable [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Calling heap.Init on non-pointer
  • Using make for heap without type
  • Incorrect pointer usage with new([]int)
3. What will be the output of the following Go code snippet that finds top 2 frequent elements?
nums := []int{1,1,1,2,2,3}
result := topKFrequent(nums, 2)
fmt.Println(result)
Assuming topKFrequent is correctly implemented using a min-heap.
medium
A. [1, 3]
B. [2, 3]
C. [1, 2]
D. [3, 2]

Solution

  1. Step 1: Count frequencies of elements

    1 appears 3 times, 2 appears 2 times, 3 appears 1 time.
  2. Step 2: Extract top 2 frequent elements

    The top 2 frequent elements are 1 (3 times) and 2 (2 times). So the result is [1, 2].
  3. Final Answer:

    [1, 2] -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Top 2 frequent = [1, 2] [OK]
Hint: Count frequencies, pick top K by frequency [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing element order in output
  • Including less frequent elements
  • Ignoring frequency counts
4. The following Go code snippet is intended to find the top 3 frequent elements but has a bug. What is the bug?
func topKFrequent(nums []int, k int) []int {
    freqMap := make(map[int]int)
    for _, num := range nums {
        freqMap[num]++
    }
    
    h := &IntHeap{}
    heap.Init(h)
    
    for num, freq := range freqMap {
        heap.Push(h, Pair{freq, num})
        if h.Len() > k {
            heap.Pop(h)
        }
    }
    
    res := make([]int, 0, k)
    for h.Len() > 0 {
        p := heap.Pop(h).(Pair)
        res = append(res, p.num)
    }
    return res
}
medium
A. Result list is in ascending frequency order, needs reversing
B. Heap is not initialized before use
C. Frequency map is not counting correctly
D. Heap size check should be < k, not > k

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand heap usage and result order

    The min-heap keeps smallest frequency on top, so popping elements gives ascending frequency order.
  2. Step 2: Identify output order issue

    Appending popped elements directly results in ascending order, but top K frequent elements should be in descending order of frequency.
  3. Final Answer:

    Result list is in ascending frequency order, needs reversing -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Output order issue = Result list is in ascending frequency order, needs reversing [OK]
Hint: Pop from min-heap gives ascending order; reverse result [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Ignoring output order of popped elements
  • Not initializing heap properly
  • Incorrect frequency counting
5. Given a large list of integers where many elements have the same frequency, how should the Top K Frequent Elements Using Heap algorithm be adapted to return the top K elements sorted by frequency and then by element value ascending when frequencies tie?
hard
A. Use a map only without heap to track frequencies
B. Use a heap with custom comparison: first by frequency, then by element value ascending
C. Use a max-heap with frequency only, ignoring element value
D. Sort the entire list first, then pick first K elements

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand tie-breaking requirement

    When frequencies tie, elements should be ordered by their value ascending to maintain consistent order.
  2. Step 2: Adapt heap comparison logic

    Implement a custom comparison in the heap that compares frequency first, and if equal, compares element values ascending.
  3. Final Answer:

    Use a heap with custom comparison: first by frequency, then by element value ascending -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Custom heap comparison handles ties correctly [OK]
Hint: Add tie-breaker in heap comparison for stable ordering [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Ignoring tie-breaker in heap comparison
  • Sorting entire list unnecessarily
  • Using max-heap without tie-break logic
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard