📖 Scenario: Imagine you have a family tree represented as a binary tree. Each person has a value representing their age. You want to find if there is a path from the oldest ancestor (root) down to a youngest descendant (leaf) where the sum of ages equals a specific number.
🎯 Goal: Build a program that checks if there exists a root-to-leaf path in a binary tree such that the sum of the node values along the path equals a given target sum.
📋 What You'll Learn
Create a binary tree node structure with integer values
Build a sample binary tree with exact node values
Create a target sum variable
Write a function to check if a root-to-leaf path sums to the target
Print the result as true or false
💡 Why This Matters
🌍 Real World
Checking path sums in trees is useful in decision trees, network routing, and financial modeling where paths represent sequences of choices or transactions.
💼 Career
Understanding tree traversal and recursion is fundamental for software engineers working with hierarchical data, algorithms, and system design.
Progress0 / 4 steps
1
Create the Binary Tree Node Structure and Build the Tree
Define a struct called TreeNode with an integer val, and two pointers left and right. Then create the following binary tree exactly: root node with value 5, left child 4, right child 8, left child of 4 is 11, left and right children of 11 are 7 and 2, right child of 8 is 4, and right child of this 4 is 1.
DSA C++
Hint
Start by defining the TreeNode struct with a constructor. Then create each node and link them exactly as described.
2
Create the Target Sum Variable
Inside main(), create an integer variable called targetSum and set it to 22.
DSA C++
Hint
Simply declare int targetSum = 22; inside main().
3
Write the Function to Check Path Sum
Write a function called hasPathSum that takes a TreeNode* called root and an integer sum. It returns true if there is a root-to-leaf path where the sum of node values equals sum, otherwise false. Use recursion and check if the current node is null, if it is a leaf, and subtract the node's value from sum as you go down.
DSA C++
Hint
Use recursion to check if the current node is null, then if it's a leaf check if sum == root->val. Otherwise, subtract root->val from sum and check left and right subtrees.
4
Print the Result of Path Sum Check
In main(), call hasPathSum(root, targetSum) and print true if it returns true, otherwise print false.
DSA C++
Hint
Call hasPathSum(root, targetSum) and print true if it returns true, else print false.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What does the "Path Sum Root to Leaf" problem ask you to find in a binary tree?
easy
A. The total number of leaf nodes in the tree
B. If there exists a root-to-leaf path with a sum equal to a given target
C. The maximum depth of the binary tree
D. The sum of all node values in the tree
Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem statement
The problem asks if there is any path from the root node down to any leaf node where the sum of the node values equals a target sum.
Step 2: Differentiate from other tree properties
It is not about depth, counting leaves, or total sum, but specifically about a path sum from root to leaf.
Final Answer:
If there exists a root-to-leaf path with a sum equal to a given target -> Option B
Quick Check:
Path sum means root-to-leaf sum check [OK]
Hint: Focus on root-to-leaf paths and their sums [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing path sum with total tree sum
Checking sum for any path, not root-to-leaf
Counting nodes instead of summing values
2. Which of the following C++ function signatures correctly represents a function to check path sum in a binary tree node structure?
easy
A. bool hasPathSum(TreeNode root, int targetSum)
B. int hasPathSum(TreeNode root, int targetSum)
C. void hasPathSum(TreeNode* root, int targetSum)
D. bool hasPathSum(TreeNode* root, int targetSum)
Solution
Step 1: Check parameter types and return type
The function should take a pointer to the root node (TreeNode*) and an integer target sum, and return a boolean indicating if such a path exists.
Step 2: Validate each option
bool hasPathSum(TreeNode* root, int targetSum) uses pointer and bool return type, which is correct. Options B and D pass TreeNode by value (less efficient), and B returns int, C returns void which is incorrect.
Final Answer:
bool hasPathSum(TreeNode* root, int targetSum) -> Option D
Quick Check:
Pointer input and bool output needed [OK]
Hint: Use pointer for tree nodes and bool for yes/no answers [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Passing node by value instead of pointer
Using wrong return type like void or int
Missing pointer symbol (*) in parameter
3. What will be the output of the following code snippet?
#include <iostream>
struct TreeNode {
int val;
TreeNode* left;
TreeNode* right;
TreeNode(int x) : val(x), left(nullptr), right(nullptr) {}
};
bool hasPathSum(TreeNode* root, int targetSum) {
if (!root) return false;
if (!root->left && !root->right) return root->val == targetSum;
return hasPathSum(root->left, targetSum - root->val) || hasPathSum(root->right, targetSum - root->val);
}
int main() {
TreeNode* root = new TreeNode(5);
root->left = new TreeNode(4);
root->right = new TreeNode(8);
root->left->left = new TreeNode(11);
root->left->left->left = new TreeNode(7);
root->left->left->right = new TreeNode(2);
root->right->left = new TreeNode(13);
root->right->right = new TreeNode(4);
root->right->right->right = new TreeNode(1);
bool result = hasPathSum(root, 22);
std::cout << (result ? "true" : "false") << std::endl;
return 0;
}
medium
A. true
B. false
C. Compilation error
D. Runtime error
Solution
Step 1: Trace the path sums in the tree
Check if any root-to-leaf path sums to 22. One path is 5->4->11->2 = 22.
Step 2: Confirm function logic and output
The function correctly returns true if such a path exists. The code prints "true".
Final Answer:
true -> Option A
Quick Check:
Path 5+4+11+2 = 22 found [OK]
Hint: Check leaf paths sums carefully [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Ignoring leaf node condition
Subtracting values incorrectly
Assuming no path matches without checking all
4. Identify the bug in the following code that attempts to check path sum in a binary tree:
A. The leaf node check should return false instead of comparison
B. The base case incorrectly returns false for nullptr
C. The targetSum is not reduced by root->val in recursive calls
D. The function should return int instead of bool
Solution
Step 1: Analyze recursive calls
The function calls itself with the same targetSum without subtracting the current node's value, so it never reduces the sum along the path.
Step 2: Identify correct recursive logic
It should call hasPathSum(root->left, targetSum - root->val) and similarly for right to correctly track remaining sum.
Final Answer:
The targetSum is not reduced by root->val in recursive calls -> Option C
Quick Check:
Subtract node value each step [OK]
Hint: Always subtract current node value from targetSum in recursion [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Not updating targetSum in recursive calls
Confusing base case return values
Returning wrong data type
5. Given a binary tree where node values can be negative, zero, or positive, which modification is necessary to correctly check for a path sum equal to a target value?
medium
A. No modification needed; the standard path sum check works for all values
B. Use a global variable to track sums instead of subtracting targetSum
C. Modify the function to return the maximum path sum instead of a boolean
D. Check all paths, not just root-to-leaf, because negative values can cancel out sums
Solution
Step 1: Consider negative values in path sum
The standard recursive algorithm subtracts the current node's value (which can be negative) from the targetSum at each step, correctly handling negatives, zeros, and positives for root-to-leaf paths.
Step 2: No change required
The problem is specifically for root-to-leaf paths, not arbitrary paths, so no modification is needed.
Final Answer:
No modification needed; the standard path sum check works for all values -> Option A
Quick Check:
Recursion handles negatives via subtraction [OK]
Hint: Standard path sum recursion works with negative node values [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Thinking negatives require checking all paths
Using global variables unnecessarily
Changing return type without reason
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.