Merge K Sorted Lists Using Min Heap in DSA C++ - Time & Space Complexity

Time Complexity: Merge K Sorted Lists Using Min Heap

O(n log k)

Understanding Time Complexity

We want to know how the time to merge multiple sorted lists grows as the number of lists and their sizes increase.

How does using a min heap help us merge efficiently?

Scenario Under Consideration

Analyze the time complexity of the following code snippet.

struct ListNode {
    int val;
    ListNode* next;
};

ListNode* mergeKLists(std::vector& lists) {
    auto cmp = [](ListNode* a, ListNode* b){return a->val > b->val;};
    std::priority_queue<ListNode*, std::vector<ListNode*>, decltype(cmp)> minHeap(cmp);
    for (auto list : lists) {
        if (list) minHeap.push(list);
    }
    ListNode dummy; ListNode* tail = &dummy;
    while (!minHeap.empty()) {
        auto node = minHeap.top(); minHeap.pop();
        tail->next = node; tail = tail->next;
        if (node->next) minHeap.push(node->next);
    }
    return dummy.next;
}
    

This code merges k sorted linked lists into one sorted list using a min heap to always pick the smallest current node.

Identify Repeating Operations

Identify the loops, recursion, array traversals that repeat.

• Primary operation: Extracting the smallest node from the min heap and inserting the next node from that list.
• How many times: This happens once for each node across all lists, so total n times where n is the total number of nodes.

How Execution Grows With Input

Each of the n nodes is pushed and popped from the min heap, which has size at most k (number of lists).

Input Size (n)	Approx. Operations
10 (k=3)	About 10 insertions and removals from a heap of size 3
100 (k=5)	About 100 insertions and removals from a heap of size 5
1000 (k=10)	About 1000 insertions and removals from a heap of size 10

Pattern observation: The number of operations grows roughly linearly with total nodes n, but each heap operation costs log k time, so total work grows as n times log k.

Final Time Complexity

Time Complexity: O(n log k)

This means the time grows linearly with total nodes n, multiplied by the cost of managing the heap of size k.

Common Mistake

[X] Wrong: "Merging k lists is just like merging two lists, so it takes O(n) time."

[OK] Correct: Merging k lists involves repeatedly choosing the smallest among k current nodes, which requires extra work using a heap, making it slower than just merging two lists.

Interview Connect

Understanding this time complexity helps you explain why using a min heap is efficient for merging multiple sorted lists, a common problem in coding interviews.

Self-Check

"What if we used a simple linear search to find the smallest node instead of a min heap? How would the time complexity change?"

Practice

1. What is the main advantage of using a min heap to merge K sorted lists?

easy

A. It efficiently finds the smallest element among the heads of all lists.

B. It sorts each list individually before merging.

C. It uses extra memory to store all elements at once.

D. It merges lists by concatenating them without sorting.

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the role of min heap in merging

   A min heap helps quickly find the smallest element among multiple sorted lists by always keeping the smallest element at the top.

2. Step 2: Compare with other options

   Options A, B, and C do not describe the min heap's advantage correctly. The min heap does not sort lists individually or concatenate without sorting.

3. Final Answer:

   It efficiently finds the smallest element among the heads of all lists. -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Min heap = efficient smallest element retrieval [OK]

Hint: Min heap always gives smallest element fast [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Thinking min heap sorts entire lists
• Assuming min heap stores all elements at once
• Confusing min heap with simple concatenation

2. Which of the following is the correct way to push an element into a min heap in C++ using STL?

easy

A. std::priority_queue minHeap; minHeap.push(5);

B. std::priority_queue<int> minHeap; minHeap.push(5);

C. std::priority_queue minHeap; minHeap.push(5);

D. std::priority_queue minHeap; minHeap.push(5);

Solution

1. Step 1: Identify min heap declaration syntax

   In C++, to create a min heap, use std::priority_queue with std::greater comparator and std::vector as container.

2. Step 2: Check each option

   std::priority_queue minHeap; minHeap.push(5); uses std::greater and vector correctly. std::priority_queue<int> minHeap; minHeap.push(5); is max heap by default. std::priority_queue minHeap; minHeap.push(5); uses std::less which is max heap. std::priority_queue minHeap; minHeap.push(5); uses std::list which is invalid container for priority_queue.

3. Final Answer:

   std::priority_queue minHeap; minHeap.push(5); -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Min heap = priority_queue + greater + vector [OK]

Hint: Min heap needs std::greater and vector container [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using default priority_queue (max heap)
• Using std::less instead of std::greater
• Using invalid container like std::list

3. What will be the output of the following code snippet that merges 3 sorted lists using a min heap?

#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <queue>

struct Node {
    int val;
    int listIndex;
    int elementIndex;
    Node(int v, int li, int ei) : val(v), listIndex(li), elementIndex(ei) {}
};

struct Compare {
    bool operator()(Node const& a, Node const& b) {
        return a.val > b.val;
    }
};

int main() {
    std::vector lists = {{1,4,5}, {1,3,4}, {2,6}};
    std::priority_queue minHeap;

    for (int i = 0; i < lists.size(); i++) {
        if (!lists[i].empty())
            minHeap.push(Node(lists[i][0], i, 0));
    }

    std::vector<int> merged;
    while (!minHeap.empty()) {
        Node curr = minHeap.top();
        minHeap.pop();
        merged.push_back(curr.val);
        int nextIndex = curr.elementIndex + 1;
        if (nextIndex < lists[curr.listIndex].size()) {
            minHeap.push(Node(lists[curr.listIndex][nextIndex], curr.listIndex, nextIndex));
        }
    }

    for (int val : merged) std::cout << val << " ";
    return 0;
}

medium

A. 1 1 2 3 4 4 5 6

B. 1 2 3 4 4 5 6

C. 1 1 3 4 4 5 6 2

D. 2 1 1 3 4 4 5 6

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the merging process

   The code pushes the first element of each list into the min heap. Then it repeatedly extracts the smallest element and pushes the next element from the same list until all elements are merged.

2. Step 2: Trace the merged output

   Lists: {1,4,5}, {1,3,4}, {2,6}. Merged order: 1 (from list0), 1 (list1), 2 (list2), 3 (list1), 4 (list0), 4 (list1), 5 (list0), 6 (list2).

3. Final Answer:

   1 1 2 3 4 4 5 6 -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Merge sorted lists = 1 1 2 3 4 4 5 6 [OK]

Hint: Push first elements, pop min, push next from same list [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Mixing order of elements
• Forgetting to push next element after pop
• Ignoring duplicates in merged output

4. Identify the bug in the following code snippet that attempts to merge K sorted lists using a min heap:

std::priority_queue minHeap;
for (auto& list : lists) {
    for (int val : list) {
        minHeap.push(val);
    }
}
std::vector<int> merged;
while (!minHeap.empty()) {
    merged.push_back(minHeap.top());
    minHeap.pop();
}

medium

A. The min heap is declared incorrectly and will cause a compilation error.

B. The code pushes all elements at once, losing the benefit of merging sorted lists efficiently.

C. The code does not pop elements from the min heap, causing an infinite loop.

D. The merged vector is not initialized before use.

Solution

1. Step 1: Analyze the approach used

   The code pushes all elements from all lists into the min heap at once, then pops them to get sorted order.

2. Step 2: Identify inefficiency

   This approach loses the efficiency of merging K sorted lists using min heap by only pushing the first element of each list and pushing next elements on demand.

3. Final Answer:

   The code pushes all elements at once, losing the benefit of merging sorted lists efficiently. -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Push all elements at once = inefficient merge [OK]

Hint: Push only first elements, then next after popping [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Pushing all elements at once
• Ignoring heap declaration correctness
• Forgetting to pop elements in loop

5. Given K sorted linked lists, how can you modify the min heap approach to merge them efficiently if some lists are empty and others have duplicate values?

hard

A. Ignore empty lists and merge only non-empty lists by concatenation without using a min heap.

B. Use a max heap instead of min heap to handle duplicates and empty lists.

C. Push all elements from all lists into the min heap at once, then pop to merge, skipping duplicates manually.

D. Initialize the min heap with the first non-empty element of each list and push next elements only when popping, allowing duplicates naturally.

Solution

1. Step 1: Handle empty lists and duplicates

   Skip empty lists when initializing the min heap. For duplicates, min heap naturally handles them by ordering values.

2. Step 2: Efficient merging strategy

   Push only the first element of each non-empty list into the min heap. When popping, push the next element from the same list if it exists. This keeps memory and operations efficient.

3. Final Answer:

   Initialize the min heap with the first non-empty element of each list and push next elements only when popping, allowing duplicates naturally. -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Push first non-empty elements, push next on pop, duplicates allowed [OK]

Hint: Skip empty lists, push next element after pop [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Pushing all elements at once wasting memory
• Ignoring empty lists causing errors
• Using max heap which breaks order