Find Minimum in Rotated Sorted Array in DSA C++ - Time & Space Complexity

Time Complexity: Find Minimum in Rotated Sorted Array

O(log n)

Understanding Time Complexity

We want to understand how fast we can find the smallest number in a rotated sorted array.

How does the time needed change as the array gets bigger?

Scenario Under Consideration

Analyze the time complexity of the following code snippet.

int findMin(const std::vector<int>& nums) {
    int left = 0, right = nums.size() - 1;
    while (left < right) {
        int mid = left + (right - left) / 2;
        if (nums[mid] > nums[right]) {
            left = mid + 1;
        } else {
            right = mid;
        }
    }
    return nums[left];
}
    

This code finds the minimum element by using a binary search approach on a rotated sorted array.

Identify Repeating Operations

Identify the loops, recursion, array traversals that repeat.

• Primary operation: The while loop that halves the search range each time.
• How many times: The loop runs until the search space is reduced to one element, about log base 2 of n times.

How Execution Grows With Input

Each step cuts the array roughly in half, so the number of steps grows slowly as the array grows.

Input Size (n)	Approx. Operations
10	About 4 steps
100	About 7 steps
1000	About 10 steps

Pattern observation: Doubling the input size adds only one more step, showing slow growth.

Final Time Complexity

Time Complexity: O(log n)

This means the time to find the minimum grows slowly, even if the array becomes very large.

Common Mistake

[X] Wrong: "Since the array is rotated, we must check every element to find the minimum, so it takes O(n) time."

[OK] Correct: The binary search approach uses the sorted property cleverly to skip half the elements each time, so it does not need to check all elements.

Interview Connect

Understanding this pattern helps you show how to use binary search in clever ways beyond simple sorted arrays, a skill valued in problem solving.

Self-Check

"What if the array was not rotated but still sorted? How would the time complexity change?"

Practice

1. What is the main idea behind finding the minimum element in a rotated sorted array?

easy

A. Use a hash map to store elements and find the minimum

B. Sort the array again and pick the first element

C. Traverse the array linearly and pick the smallest element

D. Use binary search to find the point where the order breaks

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the rotated sorted array property

   A rotated sorted array is sorted but rotated at some pivot point, causing a break in order.

2. Step 2: Use binary search to find the break point

   Binary search helps find the pivot where the order breaks, which is the minimum element.

3. Final Answer:

   Use binary search to find the point where the order breaks -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Binary search finds minimum in rotated array [OK]

Hint: Look for the pivot where order breaks using binary search [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Trying to sort the array again wastes time
• Linear search is slower than binary search
• Using extra space unnecessarily

2. Which of the following is the correct syntax to start a binary search loop in C++ for finding minimum in a rotated sorted array named nums?

easy

A. while (left <= right) { int mid = left + (right - left) / 2; }

B. while (left < right) { int mid = (left + right) / 2; }

C. for (int left = 0, right = nums.size() - 1; left <= right; )

D. for (int i = 0; i < nums.size(); i++)

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand binary search loop conditions

   For finding minimum in a rotated sorted array, the binary search loop typically uses while (left < right) to avoid infinite loops and correctly narrow down the search space.

2. Step 2: Check correct mid calculation and loop condition

   while (left < right) { int mid = (left + right) / 2; } is the common and correct approach for this problem.

3. Final Answer:

   while (left < right) { int mid = (left + right) / 2; } -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Correct binary search loop syntax for this problem [OK]

Hint: Use while with left < right and mid calculation [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using for loop instead of while for binary search
• Calculating mid as left + (right - left) / 2 with wrong loop condition
• Using wrong loop condition like left <= right causing infinite loop

3. What will be the output of the following C++ code snippet?

std::vector<int> nums = {4,5,6,7,0,1,2};
int left = 0, right = nums.size() - 1;
while (left < right) {
  int mid = left + (right - left) / 2;
  if (nums[mid] > nums[right]) left = mid + 1;
  else right = mid;
}
std::cout << nums[left] << std::endl;

medium

A. 0

B. 4

C. 7

D. 2

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the binary search logic on rotated array

   The code compares nums[mid] with nums[right] to decide which half to keep.

2. Step 2: Trace the loop to find minimum

   Since nums[mid] > nums[right], left moves to mid+1 until left == right at index of minimum (0).

3. Final Answer:

   0 -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Minimum element found is 0 [OK]

Hint: Compare mid and right to narrow search for minimum [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing mid and right comparison direction
• Printing nums[right] instead of nums[left]
• Not updating left or right correctly

4. Identify the error in the following code snippet that tries to find the minimum in a rotated sorted array:

int findMin(std::vector<int>& nums) {
  int left = 0, right = nums.size() - 1;
  while (left <= right) {
    int mid = left + (right - left) / 2;
    if (nums[mid] > nums[right]) left = mid + 1;
    else right = mid - 1;
  }
  return nums[left];
}

medium

A. The else block should set right = mid, not right = mid - 1

B. The loop condition should be left < right, not left <= right

C. The mid calculation causes overflow

D. The return statement should return nums[right], not nums[left]

Solution

1. Step 1: Analyze the binary search update rules

   When nums[mid] <= nums[right], the minimum is at mid or left side, so right should be set to mid.

2. Step 2: Identify incorrect update causing skipping minimum

   Setting right = mid - 1 skips mid, possibly missing the minimum element.

3. Final Answer:

   The else block should set right = mid, not right = mid - 1 -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Correct right update avoids missing minimum [OK]

Hint: Set right = mid to include mid in search [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using left <= right causes infinite loop
• Returning nums[left] is correct
• Mid calculation is safe here

5. Given a rotated sorted array nums that may contain duplicates, which modification is needed in the binary search approach to correctly find the minimum element?

hard

A. If nums[mid] == nums[right], return nums[mid] immediately

B. If nums[mid] == nums[right], increase left by one to skip duplicate

C. If nums[mid] == nums[right], reduce right by one to skip duplicate

D. Duplicates do not affect the binary search logic

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand impact of duplicates on binary search

   Duplicates can cause ambiguity when nums[mid] == nums[right], making it unclear which side to choose.

2. Step 2: Modify search by reducing right to skip duplicate

   Reducing right by one helps shrink the search space safely without missing the minimum.

3. Final Answer:

   If nums[mid] == nums[right], reduce right by one to skip duplicate -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Handle duplicates by shrinking right pointer [OK]

Hint: When equal, reduce right to skip duplicates safely [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Returning immediately on equality misses minimum
• Increasing left instead of reducing right causes errors
• Ignoring duplicates leads to wrong answers