Count Occurrences of Element in Sorted Array in DSA C++ - Cheat Sheet & Quick Revision

Recall & Review

beginner

What is the main advantage of using binary search to count occurrences of an element in a sorted array?

Binary search helps find the first and last positions of the element quickly, reducing time complexity from O(n) to O(log n).

intermediate

How do you find the first occurrence of an element using binary search?

Modify binary search to continue searching in the left half even after finding the element, until the first position is found.

intermediate

How do you find the last occurrence of an element using binary search?

Modify binary search to continue searching in the right half even after finding the element, until the last position is found.

beginner

What is the formula to calculate the count of occurrences once first and last positions are found?

Count = (last occurrence index) - (first occurrence index) + 1

beginner

Why is it important that the array is sorted for this method?

Because binary search requires a sorted array to correctly find positions of elements efficiently.

What is the time complexity of counting occurrences using binary search in a sorted array?

A O(n)

B O(n log n)

C O(log n)

D O(1)

Binary search finds first and last occurrences in O(log n) time each, so total is O(log n).

If the first occurrence of element 5 is at index 2 and last occurrence is at index 4, what is the count of 5 in the array?

A 3

B 2

C 1

D 4

Count = 4 - 2 + 1 = 3

Which of these is NOT a step in counting occurrences using binary search?

A Sort the array again

B Find last occurrence

C Calculate count using indices

D Find first occurrence

The array must already be sorted; no need to sort again.

What happens if the element is not present in the array?

A Count is negative

B Count is one

C Algorithm fails

D Count is zero

If element is not found, count is zero.

Why can't we use linear search to count occurrences in a sorted array efficiently?

A Linear search only works on unsorted arrays

B Linear search is slower with O(n) time

C Linear search changes the array

D Linear search requires extra memory

Linear search takes O(n) time, which is slower than binary search's O(log n).

Explain how to use binary search to count the occurrences of an element in a sorted array.

Think about finding boundaries of the element's positions.

Describe why binary search is preferred over linear search for counting occurrences in a sorted array.

Focus on time complexity and array sorting.

Practice

1. What is the main advantage of using binary search to count occurrences of an element in a sorted array?

easy

A. It reduces the search time from linear to logarithmic

B. It sorts the array automatically

C. It uses less memory than linear search

D. It works only for unsorted arrays

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand linear vs binary search time

   Linear search checks each element one by one, taking O(n) time. Binary search divides the search space in half each time, taking O(log n) time.

2. Step 2: Apply binary search to counting occurrences

   Using binary search to find the first and last occurrence of the element reduces the total search time significantly compared to scanning the whole array.

3. Final Answer:

   It reduces the search time from linear to logarithmic -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Binary search = faster search [OK]

Hint: Binary search halves search space, speeding up counting [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Thinking binary search sorts the array
• Confusing memory usage with speed
• Assuming binary search works on unsorted arrays

2. Which of the following C++ function signatures is correct for finding the first occurrence of an element in a sorted array using binary search?

easy

A. int firstOccurrence(int arr[], int x)

B. void firstOccurrence(int arr[], int n, int x)

C. int firstOccurrence(int arr, int n, int x)

D. int firstOccurrence(int arr[], int n, int x)

Solution

1. Step 1: Check parameter types and count

   The function needs the array (int arr[]), its size (int n), and the target element (int x).

2. Step 2: Check return type

   It should return an int index of the first occurrence, so return type is int.

3. Final Answer:

   int firstOccurrence(int arr[], int n, int x) -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Correct parameters and return type [OK]

Hint: Function returns index, needs array, size, and target [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Missing array size parameter
• Wrong return type (void instead of int)
• Incorrect array parameter type

3. What will be the output of the following code snippet?

int arr[] = {1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 4, 5};
int n = 7;
int x = 2;

int countOccurrences(int arr[], int n, int x) {
    int first = -1, last = -1;
    int low = 0, high = n - 1;
    // Find first occurrence
    while (low <= high) {
        int mid = low + (high - low) / 2;
        if (arr[mid] == x) {
            first = mid;
            high = mid - 1;
        } else if (arr[mid] < x) {
            low = mid + 1;
        } else {
            high = mid - 1;
        }
    }
    if (first == -1) return 0;
    low = first; high = n - 1;
    // Find last occurrence
    while (low <= high) {
        int mid = low + (high - low) / 2;
        if (arr[mid] == x) {
            last = mid;
            low = mid + 1;
        } else if (arr[mid] < x) {
            low = mid + 1;
        } else {
            high = mid - 1;
        }
    }
    return last - first + 1;
}

std::cout << countOccurrences(arr, n, x) << std::endl;

medium

A. 3

B. 2

C. 1

D. 0

Solution

1. Step 1: Find first occurrence of 2

   Binary search finds first 2 at index 1.

2. Step 2: Find last occurrence of 2

   Binary search finds last 2 at index 3.

3. Step 3: Calculate count

   Count = last - first + 1 = 3 - 1 + 1 = 3.

4. Final Answer:

   3 -> Option A

5. Quick Check:

   Occurrences of 2 = 3 [OK]

Hint: Count = last index - first index + 1 [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Returning last index instead of count
• Not updating low and high correctly
• Returning 0 when element exists

4. Identify the bug in the following code for counting occurrences of an element in a sorted array:

int countOccurrences(int arr[], int n, int x) {
    int first = -1, last = -1;
    int low = 0, high = n - 1;
    while (low < high) {
        int mid = low + (high - low) / 2;
        if (arr[mid] == x) {
            first = mid;
            high = mid - 1;
        } else if (arr[mid] < x) {
            low = mid + 1;
        } else {
            high = mid - 1;
        }
    }
    if (first == -1) return 0;
    low = first; high = n - 1;
    while (low < high) {
        int mid = low + (high - low) / 2;
        if (arr[mid] == x) {
            last = mid;
            low = mid + 1;
        } else if (arr[mid] < x) {
            low = mid + 1;
        } else {
            high = mid - 1;
        }
    }
    return last - first + 1;
}

medium

A. Returning last - first instead of last - first + 1

B. Using 'while (low < high)' instead of 'while (low <= high)' causes missing last element

C. Incorrect calculation of mid index

D. Not initializing 'first' and 'last' to zero

Solution

1. Step 1: Analyze loop condition

   The loops use 'while (low < high)', which misses checking when low equals high, possibly skipping the last element.

2. Step 2: Correct loop condition

   Changing to 'while (low <= high)' ensures all elements are checked, including the last one.

3. Final Answer:

   Using 'while (low < high)' instead of 'while (low <= high)' causes missing last element -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Loop condition must include equality [OK]

Hint: Use <= in binary search loops to include all elements [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using < instead of <= in loops
• Not updating first and last correctly
• Miscomputing mid index

5. Given a sorted array with possible duplicates, how would you modify the binary search approach to count occurrences of multiple different elements efficiently without repeating the search for each element separately?

hard

A. Sort the array again before each search

B. Run binary search separately for each element to find counts

C. Precompute a frequency map using a single pass, then query counts in O(1)

D. Use linear search for each element to count occurrences

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand repeated binary search cost

   Running binary search for each element separately costs O(m log n) for m queries, which can be expensive.

2. Step 2: Use frequency map for efficiency

   A single pass over the sorted array can build a frequency map (element to count) in O(n). Then queries are O(1) each.

3. Final Answer:

   Precompute a frequency map using a single pass, then query counts in O(1) -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Frequency map = fast multiple queries [OK]

Hint: Build frequency map once, then answer queries instantly [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Running binary search repeatedly for each query
• Sorting array multiple times unnecessarily
• Using linear search for each query