Bird
Raised Fist0

Consider this buggy code snippet for removing covered intervals: ```python def remove_covered_intervals(intervals): intervals.sort(key=lambda x: (x[0], x[1])) # Bug here count = 0 max_end = 0 for _, end in intervals: if end > max_end: count += 1 max_end = end return count ``` What is the subtle bug causing incorrect results?

medium🐞 Bug Identification Q7 of Q15
Intervals - Remove Covered Intervals
Consider this buggy code snippet for removing covered intervals: ```python def remove_covered_intervals(intervals): intervals.sort(key=lambda x: (x[0], x[1])) # Bug here count = 0 max_end = 0 for _, end in intervals: if end > max_end: count += 1 max_end = end return count ``` What is the subtle bug causing incorrect results?
ASorting by end ascending instead of descending causes coverage detection failure
BUsing strict inequality 'end > max_end' misses intervals with equal ends
CNot updating max_end inside the loop
DCounting intervals before sorting
Step-by-Step Solution
Solution:
  1. Step 1: Identify sorting key

    Sorting by (start asc, end asc) fails to place longer intervals before shorter ones with same start.
  2. Step 2: Impact on coverage detection

    Coverage detection requires sorting by end descending to ensure covering intervals come first.
  3. Final Answer:

    Option A -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Incorrect sorting order breaks coverage logic [OK]
Quick Trick: Sort by end descending to detect coverage correctly [OK]
Common Mistakes:
MISTAKES
  • Sorting end ascending
  • Misunderstanding coverage order
Trap Explanation:
PITFALL
  • Candidates overlook sorting order impact on coverage detection.
Interviewer Note:
CONTEXT
  • Tests bug spotting in sorting key for coverage problems.
Master "Remove Covered Intervals" in Intervals

3 interactive learning modes - each teaches the same concept differently

Want More Practice?

15+ quiz questions · All difficulty levels · Free

Free Signup - Practice All Questions
More Intervals Quizzes