Bird
Raised Fist0

When is approach 1 preferable over approach 2?

hard⚖️ Approach Comparison Q8 of Q15
Intervals - Employee Free Time
Consider two approaches to find Employee Free Time: 1) Sorting all intervals and merging overlapping ones. 2) Sweep line event processing on all interval endpoints. When is approach 1 preferable over approach 2?
AWhen intervals are very sparse and few overlaps exist
BWhen intervals have many identical start and end times
CWhen the timeline length is extremely large compared to number of intervals
DWhen intervals are unsorted and must be processed in streaming fashion
Step-by-Step Solution
Solution:
  1. Step 1: Recognize approach 1 merges intervals directly, avoiding event sorting overhead

    Sorting intervals by start time and merging is simpler and efficient when timeline length is large but intervals are few.
  2. Step 2: Approach 2 processes all endpoints, which can be costly if timeline is large or many endpoints exist

    Sweep line is optimal for dense intervals but may be less efficient if timeline is huge and intervals are sparse.
  3. Final Answer:

    Option C -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Sorting and merging is better when timeline is large and intervals are sparse [OK]
Quick Trick: Merging intervals is better for sparse intervals on large timeline [OK]
Common Mistakes:
MISTAKES
  • Assuming sweep line is always better regardless of input distribution
Trap Explanation:
PITFALL
  • Candidates overlook input distribution and timeline scale affecting approach efficiency.
Interviewer Note:
CONTEXT
  • Tests tradeoff reasoning between two common interval approaches.
Master "Employee Free Time" in Intervals

3 interactive learning modes - each teaches the same concept differently

Want More Practice?

15+ quiz questions · All difficulty levels · Free

Free Signup - Practice All Questions
More Intervals Quizzes