It returns the exact class of an object. For example, <code>5.class</code> returns <code>Integer</code>.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
What is the difference between .class and .is_a? in Ruby?
<code>.class</code> checks the exact class of an object, while <code>.is_a?</code> checks if the object is an instance of a class or any of its parent classes (inheritance).
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
How does .is_a? help with inheritance?
It returns <code>true</code> if the object is an instance of the given class or any class it inherits from, making it useful to check for types in a family of classes.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
Example: What is the output of "hello".class and "hello".is_a?(String)?
The output of "hello".class is String. The output of "hello".is_a?(String) is true.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
Can .is_a? return true for a superclass?
Yes, <code>.is_a?</code> returns <code>true</code> if the object is an instance of the class or any of its superclasses.
Click to reveal answer
What does obj.class return in Ruby?
AWhether obj is a string
BTrue if obj is a class
CThe superclass of obj
DThe exact class of obj
✗ Incorrect
.class returns the exact class of the object.
Which method checks if an object is an instance of a class or its parent classes?
A.is_a?
B.class
C.to_s
D.superclass
✗ Incorrect
.is_a? checks for the class or any superclass.
What will 5.is_a?(Numeric) return?
Afalse
Bnil
Ctrue
Derror
✗ Incorrect
5 is an Integer, which inherits from Numeric, so .is_a?(Numeric) returns true.
If obj.class == String is true, what does obj.is_a?(Object) return?
Afalse
Btrue
Cnil
Derror
✗ Incorrect
All classes in Ruby inherit from Object, so .is_a?(Object) returns true.
Which method would you use to check if an object is exactly a certain class, not a subclass?
A.instance_of?
B.kind_of?
C.is_a?
D.class
✗ Incorrect
.instance_of? checks if the object is exactly that class, not subclasses.
Explain the difference between .class and .is_a? in Ruby with examples.
Think about checking exact type vs family of types.
You got /3 concepts.
How can you use .is_a? to safely check an object's type in a program?
Consider when you want to accept objects of related types.
You got /3 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What does the .class method return when called on an object in Ruby?
easy
A. Whether the object is a kind of a class
B. The exact type (class) of the object
C. The parent class of the object
D. A boolean indicating if the object is a class
Solution
Step 1: Understand what .class does
The .class method returns the exact class of the object it is called on.
Step 2: Compare with other options
Options A, C, and D describe behaviors of other methods or incorrect meanings.
Final Answer:
The exact type (class) of the object -> Option B
Quick Check:
.class returns exact type [OK]
Hint: Remember: .class gives exact type, not inheritance [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing .class with .is_a?
Thinking .class returns boolean
Assuming .class returns parent class
2. Which of the following is the correct syntax to check if variable x is an instance of the Integer class using .is_a??
easy
A. x.is_a?(Integer)
B. x.is_a(Integer)
C. x.is_a<Integer>
D. x.is_a? Integer
Solution
Step 1: Recall the syntax of .is_a?
The method .is_a? requires a class argument inside parentheses, like .is_a?(ClassName).
Step 2: Check each option
x.is_a?(Integer) uses correct syntax with parentheses and question mark. Options A, B, and D have syntax errors or missing parentheses.
Final Answer:
x.is_a?(Integer) -> Option A
Quick Check:
Use parentheses with .is_a? [OK]
Hint: Always use parentheses with .is_a? method [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Omitting parentheses after .is_a?
Using angle brackets instead of parentheses
Leaving out the question mark
3. What will be the output of the following Ruby code?
class Animal; end
class Dog < Animal; end
dog = Dog.new
puts dog.class
puts dog.is_a?(Animal)
medium
A. Dog
true
B. Animal
true
C. Dog
false
D. Animal
false
Solution
Step 1: Understand dog.class
The dog object is an instance of Dog, so dog.class returns Dog.
Step 2: Understand dog.is_a?(Animal)
Since Dog inherits from Animal, dog.is_a?(Animal) returns true.
Final Answer:
Dog
true -> Option A
Quick Check:
.class exact type, .is_a? checks inheritance [OK]
Hint: Remember: .class exact, .is_a? true for subclasses too [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Thinking .class returns parent class
Assuming .is_a? false for subclasses
Confusing output order
4. Identify the error in the following Ruby code snippet:
num = 10
if num.is_a?(Integer)
puts "Number is integer"
else
puts "Number is not integer"
end
medium
A. Syntax error in if statement
B. Missing parentheses in is_a? call
C. No error, code runs correctly
D. Incorrect class name Integer
Solution
Step 1: Check is_a? usage
The method .is_a? is correctly called with parentheses and the class Integer.
Step 2: Verify syntax correctness
The if statement and puts calls are syntactically correct.
Final Answer:
No error, code runs correctly -> Option C
Quick Check:
Correct syntax and usage means no error [OK]
Hint: Check parentheses and class names carefully [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Removing parentheses from is_a?
Using wrong class name like 'int'
Misplacing if-end keywords
5. Given the following code, which option correctly filters only strings from the mixed array using .is_a??
We want to select only elements that are strings, so we check if each item is a kind of String.
Step 2: Compare options
item.is_a?(String) uses .is_a?(String) which returns true for strings. item.class == String uses .class == String which also works but is less flexible if subclasses exist. Options C and D filter integers or non-strings, which is incorrect.
Final Answer:
item.is_a?(String) -> Option D
Quick Check:
Use .is_a?(String) to filter strings [OK]
Hint: Use .is_a?(String) to include subclasses too [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using .class == String and missing subclasses
Filtering wrong types by mistake
Forgetting question mark in .is_a?
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.