In Redis, transactions group commands to execute as a single unit. What does atomicity guarantee in this context?
Think about what happens if one command fails inside a transaction.
Atomicity means the transaction is indivisible: all commands run without interruption from other clients, preventing interleaved updates.
Consider the following Redis commands executed as a transaction:
MULTI SET key1 value1 INCR key2 EXEC
Assuming key2 does not exist before, what will be the result of EXEC?
Remember that INCR on a non-existing key initializes it to 0 before incrementing.
The SET command returns "OK". The INCR command increments key2 from 0 to 1 and returns 1. So the EXEC returns an array with these results.
Identify the correct sequence of Redis commands to start a transaction, add commands, and execute it.
The transaction must start with MULTI and end with EXEC.
The correct order is to start with MULTI, queue commands, then call EXEC to run them all.
Which mechanism does Redis use to guarantee that all commands in a transaction execute atomically?
Think about Redis's single-threaded nature and command processing.
Redis queues commands inside MULTI and executes them sequentially in one step during EXEC, ensuring atomicity without parallelism or locking.
Given this Redis transaction:
MULTI SET key1 value1 WATCH key1 EXEC
Why does this transaction not guarantee atomicity?
Consider how WATCH works relative to MULTI and EXEC.
WATCH commands must be called before MULTI. Calling WATCH inside MULTI does not monitor keys, so changes by others can happen before EXEC, breaking atomicity.