Bird
Raised Fist0
Kotlinprogramming~10 mins

Property-based testing concept in Kotlin - Interactive Code Practice

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Practice - 5 Tasks
Answer the questions below
1fill in blank
easy

Complete the code to define a property test function using Kotest.

Kotlin
fun testAddition() = property({ forAll<Int, Int> { a, b -> (a + b) [1] (b + a) } })
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
A==
B=
C!=
D<
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using assignment operator '=' instead of equality '=='
Using inequality '!=' which would invert the test logic
2fill in blank
medium

Complete the code to generate random strings for property testing.

Kotlin
val stringGen = Gen.[1](5..10)
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Alist
Bint
Cboolean
Dstring
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using Gen.int or Gen.boolean which generate numbers or booleans, not strings
Using Gen.list which generates lists, not strings
3fill in blank
hard

Fix the error in the property test that checks list reversal.

Kotlin
property({ forAll<List<Int>> { list -> list.reversed().reversed() [1] list } })
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
A!=
B=
C==
D<
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using assignment '=' instead of equality '=='
Using inequality '!=' which would fail the test
4fill in blank
hard

Fill both blanks to create a property test that checks if sorting a list keeps its size unchanged.

Kotlin
property({ forAll<List<Int>> { list -> list.sorted().[1] list.size && list.size [2] list.sorted().size } })
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Asize ==
B==
C!=
D<
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using inequality '!=' which would fail the test
Using '<' which is incorrect for size comparison
5fill in blank
hard

Fill all three blanks to create a property test that checks if concatenating two strings has length equal to the sum of their lengths.

Kotlin
property({ forAll<String, String> { s1, s2 -> (s1 + s2).[1] == s1.[2] + s2.[3] } })
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Alength
Bcount
Dsize
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using count or size which are not properties of String in Kotlin
Mixing different properties for length comparison

Practice

(1/5)
1.

What is the main idea behind property-based testing in Kotlin?

easy
A. Writing tests only for fixed input values
B. Manually verifying outputs for each test case
C. Checking if the code compiles without errors
D. Testing that a property or rule holds true for many random inputs

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand property-based testing concept

    Property-based testing means checking if a rule or property is true for many inputs, not just a few fixed ones.
  2. Step 2: Compare options with concept

    Only Testing that a property or rule holds true for many random inputs describes testing many random inputs against a property, which matches the concept.
  3. Final Answer:

    Testing that a property or rule holds true for many random inputs -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Property-based testing = many inputs tested [OK]
Hint: Look for 'many inputs' and 'rules' in the answer [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing property-based testing with example-based testing
  • Thinking it only tests fixed inputs
  • Assuming it checks compilation only
2.

Which Kotlin library is commonly used for property-based testing?

easy
A. JUnit
B. Mockito
C. Kotest
D. Retrofit

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify Kotlin testing libraries

    JUnit is for unit testing, Mockito for mocking, Retrofit for networking, Kotest supports property-based testing.
  2. Step 2: Match library to property-based testing

    Kotest provides generators and property testing features, making it the correct choice.
  3. Final Answer:

    Kotest -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Kotest = property-based testing library [OK]
Hint: Remember Kotest for property-based tests in Kotlin [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing JUnit with property-based testing support
  • Choosing Mockito which is for mocking
  • Selecting Retrofit which is unrelated
3.

Consider this Kotlin property-based test snippet using Kotest:

import io.kotest.property.checkAll

fun isSorted(list: List<Int>): Boolean = list.zipWithNext().all { it.first <= it.second }

checkAll { list ->
    assert(isSorted(list.sorted()))
}

What will this test do?

medium
A. Check that the list contains only positive numbers
B. Check that sorting any list results in a sorted list
C. Check that the list is empty
D. Check that any list is already sorted

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the test code

    The test generates many random lists of integers. For each list, it sorts the list and checks if the sorted list is sorted using isSorted.
  2. Step 2: Interpret the assertion

    The assertion verifies that sorting produces a sorted list, which is a property that should always hold.
  3. Final Answer:

    Check that sorting any list results in a sorted list -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Sorting list => sorted list [OK]
Hint: Look for sorting and isSorted check in the code [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Thinking it checks if original list is sorted
  • Assuming it checks list emptiness
  • Confusing list contents with positivity
4.

What is wrong with this Kotlin property-based test using Kotest?

checkAll<Int> { n ->
    assert(n > 0)
}

Choose the best explanation.

medium
A. It will fail because it tests all Ints, including zero and negatives
B. It will pass because all Ints are positive
C. It has a syntax error in the lambda
D. It only tests positive numbers, so it's correct

Solution

  1. Step 1: Analyze the test input range

    The test uses checkAll<Int> which generates all Int values, including negatives and zero.
  2. Step 2: Understand the assertion

    The assertion assert(n > 0) expects all numbers to be positive, which is false for many generated values.
  3. Final Answer:

    It will fail because it tests all Ints, including zero and negatives -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    All Ints include negatives, so assert fails [OK]
Hint: Remember Int includes negatives and zero [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Assuming all Ints are positive
  • Thinking lambda syntax is wrong
  • Believing test only runs on positive numbers
5.

You want to test a function reverseTwice(list: List<Int>): List<Int> that reverses a list twice. Which property-based test best checks that reverseTwice returns the original list?

fun reverseTwice(list: List<Int>): List<Int> = list.reversed().reversed()
hard
A. checkAll { list -> assert(reverseTwice(list) == list) }
B. checkAll { list -> assert(reverseTwice(list) == list.reversed()) }
C. checkAll { list -> assert(reverseTwice(list).isEmpty()) }
D. checkAll { list -> assert(reverseTwice(list).size == 0) }

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the function behavior

    Reversing a list twice should return the original list unchanged.
  2. Step 2: Match the property test to the behavior

    checkAll { list -> assert(reverseTwice(list) == list) } asserts that reverseTwice(list) equals the original list, which correctly tests the property.
  3. Final Answer:

    checkAll<List<Int>> { list -> assert(reverseTwice(list) == list) } -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Reverse twice = original list [OK]
Hint: Check if test compares to original list [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Comparing to reversed list instead of original
  • Checking if result is empty incorrectly
  • Testing size equals zero wrongly
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard