Bird
Raised Fist0
Kotlinprogramming~10 mins

In variance (contravariance) in Kotlin - Step-by-Step Execution

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Concept Flow - In variance (contravariance)
Start: Function expects Consumer<T>
↓
Use Consumer<in T> to accept T or its supertypes
↓
Pass Consumer<SuperType> where Consumer<T> expected
↓
Function calls consumer.accept(T)
↓
Consumer handles T or subtype safely
↓
End
Shows how contravariance allows passing a consumer of a supertype where a consumer of a subtype is expected, enabling safe input.
Execution Sample
Kotlin
interface Consumer<in T> {
    fun accept(item: T)
}

fun feedConsumer(consumer: Consumer<String>) {
    consumer.accept("Hello")
}
Defines a Consumer interface with contravariant type T and a function that feeds a String to the consumer.
Execution Table
StepActionType of consumer passedaccept() argument typeResult
1Call feedConsumer with Consumer<Any>Consumer<Any>StringAllowed: Consumer<Any> accepts String
2Inside feedConsumer, call consumer.accept("Hello")Consumer<Any>StringPrints or processes "Hello"
3Call feedConsumer with Consumer<String>Consumer<String>StringAllowed: exact match
4Inside feedConsumer, call consumer.accept("Hello")Consumer<String>StringPrints or processes "Hello"
5Call feedConsumer with Consumer<Int>Consumer<Int>StringError: Consumer<Int> cannot accept String
6Execution stops due to type mismatch---
💡 Cannot pass Consumer<Int> where Consumer<String> expected because Int is not a supertype of String
Variable Tracker
VariableStartAfter Step 1After Step 3After Step 5
consumerundefinedConsumer<Any>Consumer<String>Consumer<Int> (invalid)
accept argumentundefined"Hello" (String)"Hello" (String)Type mismatch
Key Moments - 2 Insights
Why can we pass Consumer<Any> to a function expecting Consumer<String>?
Because Consumer is declared with 'in' (contravariant), it can accept supertypes of String, so Consumer<Any> can safely consume Strings (see execution_table rows 1 and 2).
Why can't we pass Consumer<Int> to feedConsumer expecting Consumer<String>?
Consumer<Int> expects Int inputs, but feedConsumer passes a String, causing a type mismatch (see execution_table row 5). Contravariance only allows supertypes, not unrelated or subtypes.
Visual Quiz - 3 Questions
Test your understanding
Look at the execution_table, what type of consumer is allowed to be passed to feedConsumer?
AConsumer<Double>
BConsumer<Int>
CConsumer<Any>
DConsumer<List<String>>
💡 Hint
Check execution_table rows 1 and 5 to see which consumer types are accepted or rejected.
At which step does the execution stop due to a type mismatch?
AStep 5
BStep 4
CStep 2
DStep 3
💡 Hint
Look at execution_table row 5 where Consumer is passed and causes an error.
If we remove 'in' from Consumer<T>, what happens when passing Consumer<Any> to feedConsumer?
AIt works the same
BIt causes a type error
CConsumer<Any> becomes Consumer<String>
DThe function accepts any consumer
💡 Hint
Contravariance ('in') allows passing supertypes; removing it disables this flexibility (see concept_flow).
Concept Snapshot
In variance (contravariance) in Kotlin uses 'in' keyword.
It allows a generic type Consumer<in T> to accept T or any supertype.
This means you can pass Consumer<Any> where Consumer<String> is expected.
Useful for input-only generic types.
Contravariance ensures type safety when consuming values.
Full Transcript
This visual trace shows how Kotlin's in variance (contravariance) works with a Consumer interface. The Consumer interface is declared with 'in T', meaning it can accept T or any supertype of T. The feedConsumer function expects a Consumer<String>. Thanks to contravariance, you can pass a Consumer<Any> safely because Any is a supertype of String. The execution table shows steps where Consumer<Any> and Consumer<String> are accepted, but Consumer<Int> is rejected because Int is not a supertype of String. Variable tracking shows how the consumer variable changes type across calls. Key moments clarify why contravariance allows supertypes but not unrelated types. The quiz tests understanding of allowed types, error steps, and the effect of removing 'in'. This helps beginners see how contravariance enables safe input flexibility in Kotlin generics.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What does the in keyword mean when used in Kotlin generics?
easy
A. It marks a generic type as contravariant, allowing it to accept supertypes safely.
B. It marks a generic type as covariant, allowing it to produce subtypes safely.
C. It restricts a generic type to only accept exact types, no subtypes or supertypes.
D. It means the generic type can be used both as input and output without restrictions.

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand variance keywords in Kotlin generics

    Kotlin uses in for contravariance and out for covariance.
  2. Step 2: Identify the meaning of in

    in means the generic type can accept supertypes safely as input but cannot produce output of that type.
  3. Final Answer:

    It marks a generic type as contravariant, allowing it to accept supertypes safely. -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    in = contravariant = accept supertypes [OK]
Hint: Remember: 'in' means input only, contravariant [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing 'in' with 'out' variance
  • Thinking 'in' allows output of the generic type
  • Assuming 'in' restricts to exact types only
2. Which of the following is the correct syntax to declare a contravariant generic interface in Kotlin?
easy
A. interface Consumer { fun consume(item: T) }
B. interface Consumer { fun consume(item: T) }
C. interface Consumer<T> { fun consume(item: in T) }
D. interface Consumer<T> { fun consume(item: out T) }

Solution

  1. Step 1: Recall syntax for contravariant generic declaration

    Contravariance uses in before the generic type parameter in the interface declaration.
  2. Step 2: Check method parameter usage

    Method parameter can use the generic type normally; the variance is declared at the interface level.
  3. Final Answer:

    interface Consumer { fun consume(item: T) } -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Contravariant syntax = in before T [OK]
Hint: Use 'in' before generic type name for contravariance [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using 'out' instead of 'in' for contravariance
  • Placing 'in' inside method parameters incorrectly
  • Omitting variance keyword entirely
3. Consider the following Kotlin code:
interface Consumer {
    fun consume(item: T)
}

fun feed(consumer: Consumer<Number>) {
    consumer.consume(42)
}

val intConsumer: Consumer<Int> = object : Consumer<Int> {
    override fun consume(item: Int) {
        println("Consumed: $item")
    }
}

feed(intConsumer)

What will happen when this code runs?
medium
A. Prints 'Consumed: 42' successfully.
B. Runtime error due to type mismatch.
C. Compilation error because Consumer<Int> is not a subtype of Consumer<Number>.
D. Prints nothing because consume is never called.

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand contravariance direction

    Contravariance means Consumer<Supertype> can accept Consumer<Subtype>, not the other way around.
  2. Step 2: Analyze the call feed(intConsumer)

    feed expects Consumer<Number>, but intConsumer is Consumer<Int>. Since Int is subtype of Number, Consumer<Int> is not subtype of Consumer<Number> when contravariant.
  3. Final Answer:

    Compilation error because Consumer<Int> is not a subtype of Consumer<Number>. -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Contravariance reverses subtype relation [OK]
Hint: Contravariant: Consumer<Super> accepts Consumer<Sub>, not vice versa [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Assuming Consumer<Int> can be passed where Consumer<Number> is expected
  • Confusing covariance and contravariance
  • Expecting runtime error instead of compile-time error
4. Given this Kotlin code snippet:
interface Consumer {
    fun consume(item: T)
}

fun process(consumer: Consumer<Number>) {
    consumer.consume(3.14)
}

val doubleConsumer: Consumer<Double> = object : Consumer<Double> {
    override fun consume(item: Double) {
        println("Consumed double: $item")
    }
}

process(doubleConsumer)

Why does this code cause a compilation error?
medium
A. Because Consumer<Double> cannot be passed where Consumer<Number> is expected due to contravariance.
B. Because Double is not a subtype of Number.
C. Because consume method parameter type is incorrect.
D. Because process function tries to consume an Int instead of a Double.

Solution

  1. Step 1: Recall contravariance subtype rules

    For Consumer, Consumer<Supertype> can accept Consumer<Subtype>, not the reverse.
  2. Step 2: Check the types in the call

    process expects Consumer<Number>, but doubleConsumer is Consumer<Double>. Double is subtype of Number, so Consumer<Double> is not subtype of Consumer<Number>.
  3. Final Answer:

    Because Consumer<Double> cannot be passed where Consumer<Number> is expected due to contravariance. -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Contravariance reverses subtype relation [OK]
Hint: Contravariant types reverse subtype order [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Thinking Double is not subtype of Number
  • Confusing method parameter types
  • Assuming runtime error instead of compile-time
5. You want to create a function that accepts any consumer that can consume Number or any of its supertypes safely. Which declaration correctly uses contravariance to allow this flexibility?
interface Consumer {
    fun consume(item: T)
}

fun acceptConsumer(consumer: Consumer<___>) {
    consumer.consume(100)
}
hard
A. Nothing
B. Number
C. Int
D. Any

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand contravariance usage

    Contravariance allows passing a consumer of a supertype to a function expecting a consumer of a subtype.
  2. Step 2: Determine the correct generic type

    To accept consumers that can consume Number or any supertype safely (i.e., Consumer<Number> and Consumer<Any>), use Any as the generic parameter.
  3. Final Answer:

    Any -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Contravariant consumer accepts supertypes [OK]
Hint: Use Any (a supertype of Number) for contravariant parameter to accept consumers of Number or its supertypes [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using supertype like Any, which only accepts Consumer<Any>
  • Using subtype like Int
  • Using Nothing which is subtype of all types
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard