What if you could instantly find the cheapest way through a maze of streets without trying every path?
Why Minimum Path Sum in Grid in DSA Typescript?
Imagine you are walking through a city grid from the top-left corner to the bottom-right corner. Each block has a cost to cross, like traffic or tolls. You want to find the cheapest path to reach your destination.
Trying every possible path manually is like checking every street and alley in the city. It takes too long and is easy to get lost or miss cheaper routes. This makes finding the best path slow and frustrating.
Using the Minimum Path Sum method, we calculate the cheapest cost step-by-step, remembering the best cost to reach each block. This way, we avoid repeating work and quickly find the cheapest path.
function minPathSum(grid: number[][]): number {
// Try all paths recursively - very slow
function dfs(row: number, col: number): number {
if (row === grid.length || col === grid[0].length) return Infinity;
if (row === grid.length - 1 && col === grid[0].length - 1) return grid[row][col];
return grid[row][col] + Math.min(dfs(row + 1, col), dfs(row, col + 1));
}
return dfs(0, 0);
}function minPathSum(grid: number[][]): number {
const rows = grid.length;
const cols = grid[0].length;
const dp: number[][] = Array(rows).fill(null).map(() => Array(cols).fill(0));
dp[0][0] = grid[0][0];
for (let i = 1; i < rows; i++) dp[i][0] = dp[i - 1][0] + grid[i][0];
for (let j = 1; j < cols; j++) dp[0][j] = dp[0][j - 1] + grid[0][j];
for (let i = 1; i < rows; i++) {
for (let j = 1; j < cols; j++) {
dp[i][j] = grid[i][j] + Math.min(dp[i - 1][j], dp[i][j - 1]);
}
}
return dp[rows - 1][cols - 1];
}This method lets you quickly find the cheapest route through any grid, saving time and effort.
Delivery drivers use this to find the least costly route through city blocks, saving fuel and time.
Manual checking of all paths is slow and inefficient.
Dynamic programming remembers best costs to avoid repeated work.
Minimum Path Sum finds the cheapest path through a grid efficiently.
Practice
Given a grid of numbers, find the path from top-left to bottom-right with the smallest sum.Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem goal
The problem asks to find a path from the top-left corner to the bottom-right corner of the grid that has the smallest sum of all numbers along the path.Step 2: Clarify path movement
Movement is only allowed down or right at each step, so the path is constrained.Final Answer:
The path with the smallest sum of numbers from top-left to bottom-right -> Option BQuick Check:
Minimum path sum means smallest total sum [OK]
- Confusing minimum with maximum sum
- Counting number of paths instead of sum
- Ignoring movement constraints (only right/down)
grid with values [[1,2],[3,4]]?Solution
Step 1: Understand 2D array initialization
To create a 2D array with specific values, use nested arrays like [[1,2],[3,4]].Step 2: Check each option
const grid = [[1,2],[3,4]]; correctly uses nested arrays. Options B and D create arrays but not nested with those values. const grid = [1,2,3,4]; is a flat array.Final Answer:
const grid = [[1,2],[3,4]]; -> Option CQuick Check:
Nested arrays create 2D arrays [OK]
- Using flat arrays instead of nested arrays
- Using Array constructor incorrectly
- Confusing array length with array content
const grid = [ [1, 3, 1], [1, 5, 1], [4, 2, 1] ];
Solution
Step 1: Trace possible paths and sums
Possible minimum path: 1 -> 3 -> 1 -> 1 -> 1 = 7 (wrong path, check carefully). Another path: 1 -> 1 -> 5 -> 1 -> 1 = 9. Correct minimum path is 1 -> 3 -> 1 -> 1 -> 1 = 7 is invalid because movement is only right/down. Let's check carefully:
Path: (0,0)=1 -> (1,0)=1 -> (2,0)=4 -> (2,1)=2 -> (2,2)=1 sum=1+1+4+2+1=9
Path: (0,0)=1 -> (0,1)=3 -> (0,2)=1 -> (1,2)=1 -> (2,2)=1 sum=1+3+1+1+1=7
But movement only right/down, so path is valid.
Check if any smaller sum exists.Step 2: Confirm minimum sum
The minimum path sum is 8 by moving right, down, down, right.
Path: (0,0)=1 -> (0,1)=3 -> (1,1)=5 -> (2,1)=2 -> (2,2)=1 sum=1+3+5+2+1=12 (too large)
Try path: (0,0)=1 -> (1,0)=1 -> (1,1)=5 -> (1,2)=1 -> (2,2)=1 sum=1+1+5+1+1=9
Try path: (0,0)=1 -> (1,0)=1 -> (2,0)=4 -> (2,1)=2 -> (2,2)=1 sum=1+1+4+2+1=9
Try path: (0,0)=1 -> (0,1)=3 -> (0,2)=1 -> (1,2)=1 -> (2,2)=1 sum=1+3+1+1+1=7 (valid)
So minimum sum is 7.Final Answer:
7 -> Option AQuick Check:
Sum of path 1->3->1->1->1 = 7 [OK]
- Adding numbers from invalid paths (not only right/down)
- Forgetting to include starting cell value
- Mixing row and column indices
function minPathSum(grid: number[][]): number {
const m = grid.length;
const n = grid[0].length;
const dp = Array(m).fill(Array(n).fill(0));
dp[0][0] = grid[0][0];
for (let i = 1; i < m; i++) dp[i][0] = dp[i-1][0] + grid[i][0];
for (let j = 1; j < n; j++) dp[0][j] = dp[0][j-1] + grid[0][j];
for (let i = 1; i < m; i++) {
for (let j = 1; j < n; j++) {
dp[i][j] = Math.min(dp[i-1][j], dp[i][j-1]) + grid[i][j];
}
}
return dp[m-1][n-1];
}Solution
Step 1: Analyze dp array initialization
Using Array(m).fill(Array(n).fill(0)) creates m references to the same inner array, so updating one row updates all rows.Step 2: Understand impact on dp updates
Because all rows share the same array, dp updates overwrite each other, causing wrong results.Final Answer:
dp array initialization shares references causing incorrect updates -> Option DQuick Check:
Array.fill with objects shares references [OK]
- Using fill for 2D array causes shared references
- Ignoring empty grid input checks
- Incorrect loop start indices
const grid = [ [2, 1, 3], [6, 5, 4], [7, 8, 9] ];
Write a TypeScript function to find the minimum path sum from top-left to bottom-right, moving only right or down. What is the minimum path sum?
Solution
Step 1: Calculate dp values row-wise and column-wise
Start dp[0][0] = 2.
First row: dp[0][1] = 2+1=3, dp[0][2] = 3+3=6.
First column: dp[1][0] = 2+6=8, dp[2][0] = 8+7=15.Step 2: Fill remaining dp cells using min of top or left + current grid value
dp[1][1] = min(dp[0][1], dp[1][0]) + 5 = min(3,8)+5=8
dp[1][2] = min(dp[0][2], dp[1][1]) + 4 = min(6,8)+4=10
dp[2][1] = min(dp[1][1], dp[2][0]) + 8 = min(8,15)+8=16
dp[2][2] = min(dp[1][2], dp[2][1]) + 9 = min(10,16)+9=19Final Answer:
19 -> Option AQuick Check:
Minimum path sum dp[m-1][n-1] = 19 [OK]
- Adding values incorrectly in dp table
- Mixing up indices for rows and columns
- Not considering only right/down moves
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown
