Find Minimum in Rotated Sorted Array in DSA Rust - Cheat Sheet & Quick Revision

Recall & Review

beginner

What is a rotated sorted array?

A rotated sorted array is an array that was originally sorted in ascending order but then rotated (shifted) at some pivot point. For example, [4,5,6,7,0,1,2] is a rotated version of [0,1,2,4,5,6,7].

intermediate

Why can we use binary search to find the minimum in a rotated sorted array?

Because the array is mostly sorted except for the rotation point, we can use binary search to efficiently find the smallest element by comparing middle elements with the ends to decide which half to search next.

beginner

In the rotated sorted array [4,5,6,7,0,1,2], what is the minimum element and its index?

The minimum element is 0, and its index is 4.

intermediate

What condition indicates that the middle element is greater than the rightmost element in the rotated sorted array?

If the middle element is greater than the rightmost element, it means the minimum is in the right half of the array because the rotation point is there.

beginner

What is the time complexity of finding the minimum in a rotated sorted array using binary search?

The time complexity is O(log n) because each step halves the search space.

What does a rotated sorted array look like?

A An array sorted in ascending order but shifted at some pivot

B An array sorted in descending order

C An array with all elements equal

D An unsorted random array

A rotated sorted array is originally sorted ascending but rotated at a pivot point.

If the middle element is less than the rightmost element, where is the minimum likely located?

A At the middle only

B In the right half excluding middle

C At the rightmost element only

D In the left half including middle

If middle < rightmost, the minimum is in the left half including middle.

What is the first step in the binary search to find the minimum in a rotated sorted array?

A Compare middle element with leftmost element

B Compare middle element with rightmost element

C Sort the array first

D Check if array is empty

We compare middle with rightmost to decide which half to search next.

What is the time complexity of the binary search approach to find the minimum?

A O(log n)

B O(1)

C O(n log n)

D O(n)

Binary search halves the search space each step, so O(log n).

If the array is not rotated, where is the minimum element?

A In the middle

B At the last index

C At the first index

D Cannot determine

If not rotated, the array is sorted ascending, so minimum is at index 0.

Explain how binary search helps find the minimum element in a rotated sorted array.

Think about how the rotation splits the array into two sorted parts.

Describe the conditions to move left or right pointers when searching for the minimum in a rotated sorted array.

Focus on the comparison between middle and right elements.

Practice

1. What is the main goal when finding the minimum in a rotated sorted array?

easy

A. To sort the array back to original order

B. To find the smallest element after the rotation point

C. To count how many times the array was rotated

D. To find the largest element in the array

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the rotated sorted array

   A rotated sorted array is a sorted array shifted some positions, so the smallest element is the rotation point.

2. Step 2: Identify the minimum element

   The minimum element is the smallest value after the rotation point, which is what we want to find.

3. Final Answer:

   To find the smallest element after the rotation point -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Minimum element = smallest after rotation [OK]

Hint: Look for the smallest number where order breaks [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing minimum with maximum element
• Trying to count rotations instead of finding minimum
• Assuming array is fully sorted without rotation

2. Which Rust code snippet correctly declares a function to find the minimum in a rotated sorted array?

easy

A. fn find_min(nums: &[i32]) -> i32 { /* implementation */ }

B. function find_min(nums: Vec<i32>) -> i32 { }

C. def find_min(nums: &[i32]) -> i32 { }

D. fn find_min(nums: Vec<i32>) { return i32; }

Solution

1. Step 1: Check Rust function syntax

   Rust functions start with fn, parameters have types, and return type is after ->.

2. Step 2: Validate each option

   fn find_min(nums: &[i32]) -> i32 { /* implementation */ } uses correct Rust syntax with slice &[i32] and return type i32. Others use wrong keywords or syntax.

3. Final Answer:

   fn find_min(nums: &[i32]) -> i32 { /* implementation */ } -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Rust fn syntax with &[i32] and -> i32 [OK]

Hint: Rust functions use fn, param: type, -> return_type [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using 'function' keyword instead of 'fn'
• Mixing Python or JavaScript syntax
• Incorrect return type placement

3. What is the output of the following Rust code?

fn main() {
    let nums = vec![4,5,6,7,0,1,2];
    let min = find_min(&nums);
    println!("{}", min);
}

fn find_min(nums: &[i32]) -> i32 {
    let mut left = 0;
    let mut right = nums.len() - 1;
    while left < right {
        let mid = left + (right - left) / 2;
        if nums[mid] > nums[right] {
            left = mid + 1;
        } else {
            right = mid;
        }
    }
    nums[left]
}

medium

A. 0

B. 4

C. 7

D. 2

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the binary search logic

   The code uses binary search to find the smallest element by comparing mid and right elements.

2. Step 2: Trace the loop with input [4,5,6,7,0,1,2]

   Mid moves to find the point where array rotates; finally left points to 0, the smallest element.

3. Final Answer:

   0 -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Minimum in rotated array = 0 [OK]

Hint: Binary search narrows to smallest element [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Returning nums[mid] instead of nums[left]
• Confusing left and right pointers
• Not handling rotation correctly

4. Identify the bug in this Rust function to find the minimum in a rotated sorted array:

fn find_min(nums: &[i32]) -> i32 {
    let mut left = 0;
    let mut right = nums.len();
    while left < right {
        let mid = left + (right - left) / 2;
        if nums[mid] > nums[right] {
            left = mid + 1;
        } else {
            right = mid;
        }
    }
    nums[left]
}

medium

A. nums[left] should be nums[right] at the end

B. left should start at 1 instead of 0

C. mid calculation causes infinite loop

D. right should be nums.len() - 1 to avoid out-of-bounds

Solution

1. Step 1: Check initialization of right pointer

   right is set to nums.len(), which is out of array bounds (index max is len-1).

2. Step 2: Correct right initialization

   right should be nums.len() - 1 to avoid accessing nums[right] out of bounds.

3. Final Answer:

   right should be nums.len() - 1 to avoid out-of-bounds -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Array index max = len-1 [OK]

Hint: Array indices go from 0 to len-1 [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using nums.len() as index causes panic
• Starting left at 1 misses first element
• Changing mid calculation unnecessarily

5. Given a rotated sorted array that may contain duplicates, which modification is needed in the binary search to find the minimum correctly?

fn find_min(nums: &[i32]) -> i32 {
    let mut left = 0;
    let mut right = nums.len() - 1;
    while left < right {
        let mid = left + (right - left) / 2;
        if nums[mid] > nums[right] {
            left = mid + 1;
        } else if nums[mid] < nums[right] {
            right = mid;
        } else {
            right -= 1; // What is the reason for this?
        }
    }
    nums[left]
}

hard

A. To avoid infinite loop by always moving left

B. To speed up search by skipping elements

C. To handle duplicates by shrinking right when equal to mid

D. To sort the array during search

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand duplicates effect

   When nums[mid] equals nums[right], we cannot decide which side minimum lies, so we reduce right by one.

2. Step 2: Reason for right -= 1

   This safely shrinks the search space without missing the minimum, handling duplicates correctly.

3. Final Answer:

   To handle duplicates by shrinking right when equal to mid -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Duplicates need careful right pointer move [OK]

Hint: When equal, reduce right to handle duplicates [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Ignoring duplicates causes wrong minimum
• Moving left instead of right when equal
• Assuming no duplicates in rotated array