Tree Traversal Level Order BFS in DSA Go - Interactive Practice

Practice - 5 Tasks

1fill in blank

easy

Complete the code to initialize the queue with the root node.

DSA Go

queue := []*TreeNode[1]

Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'

ATreeNode{}

Bnil

Croot

D[]

Attempts:

3 left

💡 Hint

Common Mistakes

Initializing queue as empty instead of with root node

Using nil instead of root

Using an empty struct instead of the root pointer

We start the BFS by adding the root node to the queue.

2fill in blank

medium

Complete the code to dequeue the first node from the queue.

DSA Go

node := queue[[1]]
queue = queue[1:]

Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'

A0

B1

C-1

Dlen(queue)

Attempts:

3 left

💡 Hint

Common Mistakes

Using index 1 which skips the first element

Using negative index which is invalid

Using length of queue which is out of range

In Go slices, the first element is at index 0, so we dequeue from index 0.

3fill in blank

hard

Fix the error in the code to add the left child to the queue only if it exists.

DSA Go

if node.Left [1] nil {
    queue = append(queue, node.Left)
}

Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'

A>

B==

C<

D!=

Attempts:

3 left

💡 Hint

Common Mistakes

Checking if left child is equal to nil instead of not equal

Using comparison operators like < or > which are invalid for pointers

We add the left child only if it is not nil (exists).

4fill in blank

hard

Fill both blanks to add the right child to the queue only if it exists and continue the loop.

DSA Go

if node.Right [1] nil {
    queue = append(queue, node.Right)
}
[2]

Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'

A!=

B==

Ccontinue

Dbreak

Attempts:

3 left

💡 Hint

Common Mistakes

Using '==' instead of '!=' to check for nil

Using 'break' instead of 'continue' which stops the loop

We add the right child if it is not nil, then continue to the next iteration.

5fill in blank

hard

Fill all three blanks to complete the BFS loop that processes nodes until the queue is empty.

DSA Go

for len(queue) [1] 0 {
    node := queue[[2]]
    queue = queue[[3]:]
    // process node
}

Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'

A>

B0

C1

D<

Attempts:

3 left

💡 Hint

Common Mistakes

Using '<' instead of '>' in loop condition

Using wrong indices for dequeue and slicing

The loop runs while queue length is greater than 0, dequeues from index 0, and slices from index 1 onward.

Practice

1. What does Level Order Traversal (BFS) of a binary tree do?

easy

A. Visits nodes in postorder (left, right, root)

B. Visits nodes in preorder (root, left, right)

C. Visits nodes in inorder (left, root, right)

D. Visits nodes level by level from top to bottom, left to right

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand Level Order Traversal

   Level order traversal visits nodes one level at a time, starting from the root and moving down each level from left to right.

2. Step 2: Compare with other traversals

   Preorder, inorder, and postorder are depth-first traversals, not level by level.

3. Final Answer:

   Visits nodes level by level from top to bottom, left to right -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Level order = BFS = level by level [OK]

Hint: Level order means visit nodes by levels, top to bottom [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing level order with preorder traversal
• Thinking level order visits nodes depth-first
• Mixing up left-to-right with right-to-left order

2. Which Go code snippet correctly initializes a queue for BFS traversal of a binary tree?

easy

A. queue := make(TreeNode)

B. queue := []*TreeNode{}

C. queue := TreeNode{}

D. queue := []TreeNode

Solution

1. Step 1: Identify correct queue initialization

   In Go, a queue for BFS is usually a slice of pointers to TreeNode, so []*TreeNode{} initializes an empty slice correctly.

2. Step 2: Check other options

   make(TreeNode) is invalid because make is for slices, maps, channels, not structs. TreeNode{} is a struct instance, not a queue. []TreeNode is a slice type declaration missing initialization.

3. Final Answer:

   queue := []*TreeNode{} -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Queue for BFS = slice of *TreeNode [OK]

Hint: Use slice of pointers []*TreeNode{} for BFS queue [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using make with struct type instead of slice
• Declaring slice type without initialization
• Using struct instance instead of slice

3. What is the output of the following Go code performing level order traversal on this tree?

type TreeNode struct {
  Val   int
  Left  *TreeNode
  Right *TreeNode
}

func levelOrder(root *TreeNode) []int {
  if root == nil {
    return []int{}
  }
  queue := []*TreeNode{root}
  result := []int{}
  for len(queue) > 0 {
    node := queue[0]
    queue = queue[1:]
    result = append(result, node.Val)
    if node.Left != nil {
      queue = append(queue, node.Left)
    }
    if node.Right != nil {
      queue = append(queue, node.Right)
    }
  }
  return result
}

root := &TreeNode{Val: 1}
root.Left = &TreeNode{Val: 2}
root.Right = &TreeNode{Val: 3}
root.Left.Left = &TreeNode{Val: 4}
root.Left.Right = &TreeNode{Val: 5}

fmt.Println(levelOrder(root))

medium

A. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

B. [1, 3, 2, 5, 4]

C. [4, 5, 2, 3, 1]

D. [1, 2, 4, 5, 3]

Solution

1. Step 1: Trace the BFS queue processing

   Start with queue=[1]. Visit 1, enqueue 2 and 3. Queue=[2,3]. Visit 2, enqueue 4 and 5. Queue=[3,4,5]. Visit 3 (no children). Queue=[4,5]. Visit 4 (no children). Queue=[5]. Visit 5 (no children). Queue empty.

2. Step 2: Collect visited nodes in order

   Visited nodes in order: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.

3. Final Answer:

   [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   BFS visits nodes level-wise: 1,2,3,4,5 [OK]

Hint: Follow queue order: enqueue children left then right [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Visiting right child before left child
• Confusing BFS with DFS order
• Forgetting to append children to queue

4. The following Go code for level order traversal has a bug. What is the error?

func levelOrder(root *TreeNode) []int {
  if root == nil {
    return []int{}
  }
  queue := []*TreeNode{root}
  result := []int{}
  for len(queue) > 0 {
    node := queue[0]
    // Missing queue update here
    result = append(result, node.Val)
    if node.Left != nil {
      queue = append(queue, node.Left)
    }
    if node.Right != nil {
      queue = append(queue, node.Right)
    }
  }
  return result
}

medium

A. The root node is never added to the queue

B. Children nodes are not appended to the queue

C. The queue is never shortened, causing an infinite loop

D. The result slice is not initialized

Solution

1. Step 1: Identify queue update in BFS loop

   In BFS, after processing the first node, it must be removed from the queue (queue = queue[1:]). This code misses that step.

2. Step 2: Consequence of missing queue update

   Without removing the first node, the queue length never decreases, causing an infinite loop.

3. Final Answer:

   The queue is never shortened, causing an infinite loop -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Queue must shrink each iteration [OK]

Hint: Always remove processed node from queue in BFS loop [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Forgetting to dequeue the current node
• Appending children incorrectly
• Not initializing result slice

5. Given a binary tree, how can you modify level order traversal to return a list of lists, where each inner list contains nodes at that level only? Which approach is correct in Go? A) Use a queue and track the number of nodes at current level, dequeue exactly that many nodes, then enqueue their children. B) Use recursion to visit nodes and append values to a global list. C) Use a stack instead of a queue to reverse the order. D) Traverse the tree inorder and group nodes by their depth using a map.

hard

A. Use a queue and track nodes count per level, process level by level

B. Use recursion and append nodes to a single list

C. Use a stack to reverse traversal order

D. Use inorder traversal and group nodes by depth in a map

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand level grouping in BFS

   To group nodes by level, track how many nodes are at the current level (queue length before processing), then dequeue exactly that many nodes and collect their values.

2. Step 2: Why other options are incorrect

   Recursion without level tracking won't separate levels. Stack reverses order but doesn't group levels. Inorder traversal visits nodes depth-first, not level-wise, so grouping by depth is complex and not BFS.

3. Final Answer:

   Use a queue and track nodes count per level, process level by level -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Level order + count nodes per level = grouped levels [OK]

Hint: Count nodes in queue before each level to group them [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using recursion without level tracking
• Using stack instead of queue for BFS
• Trying inorder traversal for level grouping