A rotated sorted array is an array that was originally sorted in ascending order but then rotated (shifted) at some pivot point. For example, [4,5,6,7,0,1,2] is a rotated version of [0,1,2,4,5,6,7].
Click to reveal answer
beginner
Why can't we use simple binary search directly on a rotated sorted array?
Because the array is not fully sorted in ascending order due to rotation, simple binary search may fail. The array has two sorted parts separated by the pivot, so we need to identify which part to search in.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
In the search algorithm for a rotated sorted array, how do we decide which half to search next?
We check if the left half is sorted by comparing the start and middle elements. If it is sorted and the target lies within it, we search left. Otherwise, we search right. If the left half is not sorted, the right half must be sorted, so we check if the target lies there.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
What is the time complexity of searching in a rotated sorted array using the modified binary search?
The time complexity is O(log n) because each step halves the search space, similar to normal binary search.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
Show the Go code snippet for searching a target in a rotated sorted array using binary search.
func search(nums []int, target int) int {
left, right := 0, len(nums)-1
for left <= right {
mid := left + (right-left)/2
if nums[mid] == target {
return mid
}
if nums[left] <= nums[mid] {
if nums[left] <= target && target < nums[mid] {
right = mid - 1
} else {
left = mid + 1
}
} else {
if nums[mid] < target && target <= nums[right] {
left = mid + 1
} else {
right = mid - 1
}
}
}
return -1
}
Click to reveal answer
What is the main challenge when searching in a rotated sorted array?
AThe array contains duplicates
BThe array size is unknown
CThe array is sorted in descending order
DThe array is not fully sorted in ascending order
✗ Incorrect
The rotation breaks the full ascending order, so normal binary search cannot be applied directly.
If nums[left] <= nums[mid], what does it tell us about the array segment from left to mid?
AThis segment is sorted in ascending order
BThis segment is rotated
CThis segment is sorted in descending order
DThis segment contains the target
✗ Incorrect
If the left element is less than or equal to mid element, that segment is sorted.
What should you do if the target is not in the sorted half of the array during search?
ARestart the search
BReturn -1 immediately
CSearch in the other half
DSearch both halves
✗ Incorrect
If the target is not in the sorted half, it must be in the other half.
What is the return value if the target is not found in the rotated sorted array?
A0
B-1
CLength of the array
DNil
✗ Incorrect
The function returns -1 to indicate the target is not found.
What is the time complexity of the search algorithm in a rotated sorted array?
AO(log n)
BO(n)
CO(n log n)
DO(1)
✗ Incorrect
The algorithm halves the search space each step, so it runs in logarithmic time.
Explain how to search for a target in a rotated sorted array using binary search.
Think about how rotation splits the array into two sorted parts.
You got /5 concepts.
Describe the difference between normal binary search and binary search on a rotated sorted array.
Focus on how rotation affects sorting and search decisions.
You got /5 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What is the main challenge when searching in a rotated sorted array compared to a normal sorted array?
easy
A. The array size is unknown
B. The array contains duplicate elements
C. The array is unsorted
D. The array is split into two sorted parts, making direct binary search tricky
Solution
Step 1: Understand the array structure
A rotated sorted array is originally sorted but then rotated at some pivot, splitting it into two sorted parts.
Step 2: Identify the search challenge
Because of the rotation, a simple binary search cannot be applied directly as the array is not fully sorted in one sequence.
Final Answer:
The array is split into two sorted parts, making direct binary search tricky -> Option D
Quick Check:
Rotation splits array = search challenge [OK]
Hint: Look for the pivot splitting the array into two sorted halves [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Assuming the array is fully sorted
Ignoring the rotation pivot
Trying linear search only
2. Which of the following Go function signatures correctly represents a binary search in a rotated sorted array?
easy
A. func search(nums []int, target int) int
B. func search(nums int, target int) int
C. func search(nums []int, target string) int
D. func search(nums []int, target int) bool
Solution
Step 1: Check parameter types
The function should accept a slice of integers and an integer target to search for.
Step 2: Check return type
The function returns an integer index of the target or -1 if not found, so return type int is correct.
Final Answer:
func search(nums []int, target int) int -> Option A
Quick Check:
Correct params and return type = func search(nums []int, target int) int [OK]
Hint: Function takes []int and int target, returns int index [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using wrong parameter types
Returning bool instead of index
Using string target instead of int
3. What is the output of the following Go code snippet?
nums := []int{4,5,6,7,0,1,2}
target := 0
fmt.Println(search(nums, target))
func search(nums []int, target int) int {
left, right := 0, len(nums)-1
for left <= right {
mid := (left + right) / 2
if nums[mid] == target {
return mid
}
if nums[left] <= nums[mid] {
if nums[left] <= target && target < nums[mid] {
right = mid - 1
} else {
left = mid + 1
}
} else {
if nums[mid] < target && target <= nums[right] {
left = mid + 1
} else {
right = mid - 1
}
}
}
return -1
}
medium
A. -1
B. 0
C. 4
D. 6
Solution
Step 1: Identify target and array
Target is 0, array is rotated sorted: [4,5,6,7,0,1,2].
Step 2: Trace binary search steps
Mid starts at index 3 (value 7), target 0 is not equal. Left half [4..7] is sorted. Target 0 is not in left half, so move left to mid+1=4. Now left=4, right=6. Mid=5 (value 1). Target 0 < 1, right=mid-1=4. Now left=4, right=4. Mid=4 (value 0), found target at index 4.
Final Answer:
4 -> Option C
Quick Check:
Target 0 found at index 4 [OK]
Hint: Check mid, decide which half is sorted, adjust search [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Not updating left/right correctly
Confusing sorted half
Returning wrong index
4. The following Go code attempts to search a target in a rotated sorted array but has a bug. What is the bug?
func search(nums []int, target int) int {
left, right := 0, len(nums)-1
for left < right {
mid := (left + right) / 2
if nums[mid] == target {
return mid
}
if nums[left] <= nums[mid] {
if nums[left] <= target && target < nums[mid] {
right = mid - 1
} else {
left = mid + 1
}
} else {
if nums[mid] < target && target <= nums[right] {
left = mid + 1
} else {
right = mid - 1
}
}
}
return -1
}
medium
A. The function does not return the index
B. The loop condition should be 'left <= right' instead of 'left < right'
C. The target comparison uses wrong operators
D. The mid calculation is incorrect
Solution
Step 1: Analyze loop condition
The loop uses 'left < right', which stops when left == right, possibly missing the last element check.
Step 2: Correct loop condition
Changing to 'left <= right' ensures the last element is checked, preventing missed target.
Final Answer:
The loop condition should be 'left <= right' instead of 'left < right' -> Option B
Quick Check:
Loop must include equal to check [OK]
Hint: Use 'left <= right' to cover all elements in binary search [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using 'left < right' and missing last element
Incorrect mid calculation
Wrong comparison operators
5. Given a rotated sorted array with possible duplicates, which modification is needed in the binary search to correctly find the target?
nums := []int{2,5,6,0,0,1,2}
target := 0
hard
A. Add extra checks to skip duplicates when nums[left] == nums[mid] == nums[right]
B. Use linear search instead of binary search
C. Ignore duplicates and apply normal rotated binary search
D. Sort the array before searching
Solution
Step 1: Understand duplicates effect
Duplicates can cause ambiguity in deciding which half is sorted when nums[left] == nums[mid] == nums[right].
Step 2: Modify search to skip duplicates
When duplicates appear at left, mid, and right, increment left and decrement right to skip duplicates and continue search.
Final Answer:
Add extra checks to skip duplicates when nums[left] == nums[mid] == nums[right] -> Option A
Quick Check:
Skip duplicates to avoid ambiguity [OK]
Hint: Skip duplicates at edges when equal to mid [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Ignoring duplicates causing wrong half detection
Switching to linear search unnecessarily
Sorting array breaks problem constraints
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.