Left Side View of Binary Tree in DSA Go - Time & Space Complexity
We want to understand how the time needed to find the left side view of a binary tree changes as the tree grows.
Specifically, how does the number of steps grow when the tree has more nodes?
Analyze the time complexity of the following code snippet.
func leftSideView(root *TreeNode) []int {
if root == nil {
return []int{}
}
var result []int
queue := []*TreeNode{root}
for len(queue) > 0 {
levelSize := len(queue)
for i := 0; i < levelSize; i++ {
node := queue[0]
queue = queue[1:]
if i == 0 {
result = append(result, node.Val)
}
if node.Left != nil {
queue = append(queue, node.Left)
}
if node.Right != nil {
queue = append(queue, node.Right)
}
}
}
return result
}
This code finds the left side view by visiting nodes level by level and recording the first node at each level.
Identify the loops, recursion, array traversals that repeat.
- Primary operation: Visiting each node once in a breadth-first manner.
- How many times: Each node is processed exactly once in the inner loop.
As the number of nodes (n) increases, the code visits each node once, so the total steps grow roughly in direct proportion to n.
| Input Size (n) | Approx. Operations |
|---|---|
| 10 | About 10 visits |
| 100 | About 100 visits |
| 1000 | About 1000 visits |
Pattern observation: The number of operations grows linearly with the number of nodes.
Time Complexity: O(n)
This means the time to find the left side view grows directly with the number of nodes in the tree.
[X] Wrong: "Because we only record one node per level, the time is O(height) or less."
[OK] Correct: Even though we record one node per level, we still visit every node to know which is first at each level, so the time depends on total nodes, not just height.
Understanding this helps you explain how tree traversal works and how to analyze algorithms that visit all nodes efficiently.
"What if we changed the traversal to depth-first search instead of breadth-first? How would the time complexity change?"
Practice
Solution
Step 1: Understand the view perspective
The left side view shows nodes visible when looking at the tree from the left side.Step 2: Identify visible nodes
Only the first node encountered at each level from the left is visible.Final Answer:
Nodes visible when the tree is viewed from the left side -> Option CQuick Check:
Left side view = nodes seen from left [OK]
- Confusing left side view with right side view
- Including all leaf nodes instead of first nodes per level
- Thinking it shows deepest nodes only
Solution
Step 1: Identify Go struct syntax
Go uses 'type Name struct { fields }' with field types after names.Step 2: Check pointer usage for child nodes
Child nodes are pointers to TreeNode, written as '*TreeNode'.Final Answer:
type TreeNode struct { Val int; Left, Right *TreeNode } -> Option BQuick Check:
Go struct with pointers = type TreeNode struct { Val int; Left, Right *TreeNode } [OK]
- Using C or Java syntax instead of Go
- Missing pointer * for child nodes
- Incorrect field names or order
1
/ \
2 3
\ \
4 5
Solution
Step 1: Identify nodes visible from left at each level
Level 1: Node 1; Level 2: Node 2 (left child); Level 3: Node 4 (right child of 2, visible from left).Step 2: Collect nodes in order
Left side view nodes are [1, 2, 4].Final Answer:
[1, 2, 4] -> Option AQuick Check:
Left side nodes = [1, 2, 4] [OK]
- Choosing right child nodes instead of left
- Including nodes not visible from left
- Confusing level order
func leftSideView(root *TreeNode) []int {
var result []int
var dfs func(node *TreeNode, level int)
dfs = func(node *TreeNode, level int) {
if node == nil {
return
}
if level == len(result) {
result = append(result, node.Val)
}
dfs(node.Right, level+1)
dfs(node.Left, level+1)
}
dfs(root, 0)
return result
}Solution
Step 1: Analyze traversal order
The function visits right child before left child, so right nodes are added first.Step 2: Understand left side view logic
To get left side view, left child must be visited before right child to capture leftmost nodes first.Final Answer:
Traverse right child before left, so left side nodes missed -> Option AQuick Check:
Left side view needs left-first traversal [OK]
- Swapping left and right traversal order
- Ignoring base case (though present here)
- Appending values incorrectly
[1, 2, 3, null, 4, null, 5]Which approach correctly finds the left side view?
Solution
Step 1: Understand input format
Level order array with nulls represents tree nodes level by level, including missing nodes.Step 2: Rebuild tree structure
Reconstruct the binary tree from the array to restore parent-child links.Step 3: Perform BFS for left side view
Use breadth-first search and pick the first node at each level for left side view.Final Answer:
Rebuild the tree from level order, then do BFS picking first node at each level -> Option DQuick Check:
Rebuild + BFS first node per level = left side view [OK]
- Trying to pick nodes directly from array without tree structure
- Using DFS on array indices which is invalid
- Sorting array which loses tree structure
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown
