📖 Scenario: Imagine you have a list of wooden planks of different lengths. You want to cut these planks into smaller pieces of equal length so that you get at least a certain number of pieces. You want to find the longest possible length for these pieces.
🎯 Goal: Build a program that uses the binary search on answer technique to find the maximum length to cut the planks to get at least the required number of pieces.
📋 What You'll Learn
Create a slice called planks with the exact lengths: 4, 7, 9, 10, 15
Create an integer variable called requiredPieces and set it to 7
Write a binary search loop using low, high, and mid variables to find the maximum length
Print the final maximum length found
💡 Why This Matters
🌍 Real World
This technique helps in manufacturing and resource allocation where you want to optimize cutting or dividing materials.
💼 Career
Binary search on answer is a common pattern in coding interviews and software engineering tasks involving optimization.
Progress0 / 4 steps
1
Create the planks data
Create a slice called planks with the exact lengths: 4, 7, 9, 10, 15.
DSA Go
Hint
Use planks := []int{4, 7, 9, 10, 15} to create the slice.
2
Set the required number of pieces
Create an integer variable called requiredPieces and set it to 7.
DSA Go
Hint
Use requiredPieces := 7 to set the required number.
3
Implement binary search on answer
Write a binary search loop using variables low, high, and mid to find the maximum length to cut the planks so that the total pieces are at least requiredPieces. Use a for low <= high loop and calculate the total pieces by summing plank / mid for each plank.
DSA Go
Hint
Use a binary search loop with low, high, and mid. Calculate total pieces by summing plank / mid. Adjust low and high based on comparison with requiredPieces.
4
Print the maximum length
Print the variable result which holds the maximum length to cut the planks.
DSA Go
Hint
Use fmt.Println(result) to print the maximum length.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What is the main idea behind the Binary Search on Answer technique?
easy
A. We guess an answer and check if it satisfies the problem, then adjust the guess using binary search.
B. We sort the input array before applying binary search.
C. We use binary search to find an element in a sorted array.
D. We use recursion to divide the problem into smaller subproblems.
Solution
Step 1: Understand the technique concept
Binary Search on Answer guesses a possible answer and checks if it meets the problem's conditions.
Step 2: Adjust guess based on check
If the guess is too high or too low, we adjust it using binary search until the best answer is found.
Final Answer:
We guess an answer and check if it satisfies the problem, then adjust the guess using binary search. -> Option A
Quick Check:
Guess and check with binary search = D [OK]
Hint: Think guess-check-adjust using binary search [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing with normal binary search on arrays
Thinking it always requires sorting input
Assuming recursion is mandatory
2. Which of the following is the correct Go syntax to start a binary search on answer between low = 1 and high = 100?
easy
A. while low < high { mid = (low + high) / 2 }
B. for i := low; i < high; i++ { mid := (low + high) / 2 }
C. for low <= high { mid := (low + high) / 2 }
D. if low < high { mid := (low + high) / 2 }
Solution
Step 1: Identify Go loop syntax for binary search
Go uses for loops for iteration; for low <= high { ... } is correct for binary search.
Step 2: Check other options for syntax errors
while is not valid in Go; for i := low; i < high; i++ is a counting loop, not binary search; if is conditional, not loop.
Final Answer:
for low <= high { mid := (low + high) / 2 } -> Option C
Quick Check:
Go binary search loop uses for low <= high [OK]
Hint: Use for loop with condition low <= high in Go [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using while loop (not valid in Go)
Using for with increment instead of condition
Using if instead of loop
3. Consider the following Go code snippet using binary search on answer to find the minimum x such that x*x >= 10:
low, high := 1, 10
var ans int
for low <= high {
mid := (low + high) / 2
if mid*mid >= 10 {
ans = mid
high = mid - 1
} else {
low = mid + 1
}
}
fmt.Println(ans)
4. The following Go code tries to find the maximum length of a rope that can be cut into at least k pieces using binary search on answer. Identify the bug:
func maxRopeLength(ropes []int, k int) int {
low, high := 1, 0
for _, r := range ropes {
if r > high {
high = r
}
}
ans := 0
for low < high {
mid := (low + high) / 2
count := 0
for _, r := range ropes {
count += r / mid
}
if count >= k {
ans = mid
low = mid + 1
} else {
high = mid - 1
}
}
return ans
}
medium
A. The loop condition should be low <= high, not low < high.
B. The initial high value should be 1, not 0.
C. The count calculation should use float division, not integer division.
D. The ans variable should be initialized to high, not 0.
Solution
Step 1: Analyze binary search loop condition
The loop uses for low < high, which misses the case when low == high, possibly skipping the final answer.
Step 2: Correct loop condition for binary search
Changing to for low <= high ensures all candidates are checked, including when low equals high.
Final Answer:
The loop condition should be low <= high, not low < high. -> Option A
Quick Check:
Binary search loops use low <= high [OK]
Hint: Use low <= high to include all candidates in binary search [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using low < high and missing final check
Confusing integer and float division here
Initializing ans incorrectly
5. You want to find the minimum maximum workload to assign n tasks to m workers so that no worker has workload exceeding that value. You have an array of task times. Which approach correctly applies binary search on answer to solve this problem?
hard
A. Use binary search on the number of workers instead of workload.
B. Set low as 0, high as max task time; binary search on this range checking if sum of tasks is less than high.
C. Sort tasks and binary search for the task with median time as answer.
D. Set low as max task time, high as sum of all tasks; binary search on this range checking feasibility of workload limit.
Solution
Step 1: Define search space for answer
The minimum maximum workload must be at least the largest single task time (low) and at most the sum of all tasks (high).
Step 2: Check feasibility in binary search
For each mid in [low, high], check if tasks can be assigned to m workers without exceeding mid workload per worker.
Step 3: Adjust search based on feasibility
If feasible, try smaller max workload (high = mid - 1), else increase (low = mid + 1).
Final Answer:
Set low as max task time, high as sum of all tasks; binary search on this range checking feasibility of workload limit. -> Option D
Quick Check:
Search between max task and sum, check feasibility [OK]
Hint: Search between max single task and total sum [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Setting low to 0 ignoring max task time
Searching on wrong variable like number of workers
Not checking feasibility properly
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.