What if you could find exact spending periods instantly without checking every possibility?
Why Subarray Sum Equals K Using Hash Map in DSA Go?
Imagine you have a long list of daily expenses, and you want to find if there is a continuous period where the total spending equals exactly $100. Doing this by checking every possible period manually would take forever.
Manually adding sums for every possible sub-list means repeating many calculations, which is slow and tiring. It's easy to make mistakes and miss some periods, especially when the list is very long.
Using a hash map, we keep track of sums we have seen so far. This helps us quickly find if a previous sum matches the current sum minus the target, so we know a subarray sums to the target without checking all sub-lists again.
for i := 0; i < len(nums); i++ { sum := 0 for j := i; j < len(nums); j++ { sum += nums[j] if sum == k { return true } } }
sumCount := map[int]int{0:1}
sum := 0
for _, num := range nums {
sum += num
if sumCount[sum-k] > 0 {
return true
}
sumCount[sum]++
}This method lets you find continuous sums equal to a target in a list quickly and efficiently, even for very large lists.
Finding a period in your bank statement where your spending exactly matches a budget goal, without checking every possible date range manually.
Manual checking of all subarrays is slow and error-prone.
Hash map stores sums seen so far to find matches quickly.
Efficiently finds subarrays summing to target in one pass.
Practice
Subarray Sum Equals K problem?Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem goal
The problem requires finding subarrays whose sums equal a target value k.Step 2: Role of hash map in solution
A hash map stores cumulative sums seen so far and their counts, enabling quick checks if a previous sum exists that forms a subarray summing to k.Final Answer:
To store cumulative sums and their frequencies for quick lookup -> Option CQuick Check:
Hash map = cumulative sums storage [OK]
- Thinking hash map stores array elements as keys
- Assuming sorting is needed
- Confusing hash map with array for sums
Solution
Step 1: Identify correct map type for keys and values
We need a map with integer keys and integer values to store sums and counts.Step 2: Check Go syntax for map initialization
make(map[int]int)correctly creates a map with int keys and int values.Final Answer:
m := make(map[int]int) -> Option BQuick Check:
map[int]int = correct map type [OK]
- Using slice instead of map
- Wrong key or value types in map
- Using map with string keys incorrectly
nums := []int{1, 2, 3}
k := 3
count := 0
sum := 0
m := make(map[int]int)
m[0] = 1
for _, v := range nums {
sum += v
if val, ok := m[sum-k]; ok {
count += val
}
m[sum]++
}
fmt.Println(count)Solution
Step 1: Trace cumulative sums and map updates
Iteration 1: sum=1, m[1]=1, sum-k=-2 not in map, count=0 Iteration 2: sum=3, sum-k=0 in map with count 1, count=1, m[3]=1 Iteration 3: sum=6, sum-k=3 in map with count 1, count=2, m[6]=1Step 2: Final count after loop
Count is 2 because two subarrays sum to k=3: [1,2] and [3].Final Answer:
2 -> Option DQuick Check:
Subarrays summing to 3 = 2 [OK]
- Not initializing m[0] = 1
- Forgetting to increment map count
- Miscounting subarrays
nums := []int{1, 1, 1}
k := 2
count := 0
sum := 0
m := make(map[int]int)
for _, v := range nums {
sum += v
if val, ok := m[sum-k]; ok {
count += val
}
m[sum]++
}
fmt.Println(count)Solution
Step 1: Check map initialization
The map m is used to store cumulative sums, but m[0] is not initialized to 1 before the loop.Step 2: Effect of missing m[0] = 1
Without m[0] = 1, subarrays starting from index 0 that sum to k are not counted, causing incorrect count.Final Answer:
Missing initialization m[0] = 1 before loop -> Option AQuick Check:
Initialize m[0]=1 to count subarrays from start [OK]
- Not initializing m[0]
- Incrementing count incorrectly
- Using wrong map key type
nums = []int{3, 4, 7, 2, -3, 1, 4, 2} and k = 7, how many subarrays sum to k? Use the hash map approach to find the count.Solution
Step 1: Calculate cumulative sums and track counts
Initialize m[0]=1, sum=0, count=0 Iterate nums: - sum=3, sum-k=-4 not in m, m[3]=1 - sum=7, sum-k=0 in m=1, count=1, m[7]=1 - sum=14, sum-k=7 in m=1, count=2, m[14]=1 - sum=16, sum-k=9 not in m, m[16]=1 - sum=13, sum-k=6 not in m, m[13]=1 - sum=14, sum-k=7 in m=1, count=3, m[14]=2 - sum=18, sum-k=11 not in m, m[18]=1 - sum=20, sum-k=13 in m=1, count=4, m[20]=1Step 2: Verify subarrays
The subarrays summing to 7 are: [3,4], [7], [7,2,-3,1], [1,4,2]. Total count = 4.Final Answer:
4 -> Option AQuick Check:
Count subarrays with sum k = 4 [OK]
- Missing m[0] initialization
- Miscounting overlapping subarrays
- Not updating map counts correctly
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown
