Bird
Raised Fist0
DSA C#programming~5 mins

Search in Rotated Sorted Array in DSA C# - Time & Space Complexity

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Time Complexity: Search in Rotated Sorted Array
O(log n)
Understanding Time Complexity

We want to understand how fast we can find a number in a rotated sorted array.

The question is: how does the search time grow as the array gets bigger?

Scenario Under Consideration

Analyze the time complexity of the following code snippet.


public int Search(int[] nums, int target) {
    int left = 0, right = nums.Length - 1;
    while (left <= right) {
        int mid = left + (right - left) / 2;
        if (nums[mid] == target) return mid;
        if (nums[left] <= nums[mid]) {
            if (nums[left] <= target && target < nums[mid]) right = mid - 1;
            else left = mid + 1;
        } else {
            if (nums[mid] < target && target <= nums[right]) left = mid + 1;
            else right = mid - 1;
        }
    }
    return -1;
}
    

This code searches for a target number in a rotated sorted array using a modified binary search.

Identify Repeating Operations

Identify the loops, recursion, array traversals that repeat.

  • Primary operation: The while loop that halves the search range each time.
  • How many times: The loop runs until the search range is empty, roughly log base 2 of the array size.
How Execution Grows With Input

Each step cuts the search area in half, so the number of steps grows slowly as the array grows.

Input Size (n)Approx. Operations
10About 4 steps
100About 7 steps
1000About 10 steps

Pattern observation: Doubling the input size adds only one extra step.

Final Time Complexity

Time Complexity: O(log n)

This means the search time grows slowly, even if the array becomes very large.

Common Mistake

[X] Wrong: "Because the array is rotated, we must check every element, so it takes linear time."

[OK] Correct: The code cleverly uses the sorted parts to skip half the array each time, keeping the search fast.

Interview Connect

Understanding this search shows you can adapt classic methods to tricky situations, a skill many interviews look for.

Self-Check

"What if the array was not rotated but still sorted? How would the time complexity change?"

Practice

(1/5)
1. What is the main challenge when searching in a rotated sorted array compared to a normal sorted array?
easy
A. The array is sorted in descending order instead of ascending
B. The array contains duplicate elements that confuse the search
C. The array is split into two sorted parts, making normal binary search invalid directly
D. The array size is always odd, which affects indexing

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the array structure

    A rotated sorted array is created by taking a sorted array and rotating it at some pivot. This splits it into two sorted parts.
  2. Step 2: Why normal binary search fails

    Normal binary search assumes the entire array is sorted. Here, because of rotation, one half is sorted and the other may not be, so direct binary search won't work.
  3. Final Answer:

    The array is split into two sorted parts, making normal binary search invalid directly -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Rotation splits array = challenge for binary search [OK]
Hint: Look for the pivot splitting the array into two sorted parts [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Assuming the whole array is sorted
  • Ignoring the pivot point
  • Confusing rotation with reversal
2. Which of the following C# code snippets correctly initializes variables for binary search in a rotated sorted array?
easy
A. int left = -1, right = nums.Length - 1;
B. int left = 1, right = nums.Length;
C. int left = 0, right = nums.Length;
D. int left = 0, right = nums.Length - 1;

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand array indexing in C#

    Arrays are zero-indexed, so the first element is at 0 and the last at Length - 1.
  2. Step 2: Correct initialization for binary search

    Binary search starts with left at 0 and right at last index (Length - 1). This covers the entire array.
  3. Final Answer:

    int left = 0, right = nums.Length - 1; -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Zero-based indexing means right = Length - 1 [OK]
Hint: Start left at 0 and right at last index (Length - 1) [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Setting right to Length instead of Length - 1
  • Starting left at 1 instead of 0
  • Using negative indices
3. What will be the output of the following C# code snippet searching for target 3 in rotated array int[] nums = {4,5,6,7,0,1,2};?
int left = 0, right = nums.Length - 1;
int target = 3;
while (left <= right) {
    int mid = left + (right - left) / 2;
    if (nums[mid] == target) return mid;
    if (nums[left] <= nums[mid]) {
        if (nums[left] <= target && target < nums[mid]) right = mid - 1;
        else left = mid + 1;
    } else {
        if (nums[mid] < target && target <= nums[right]) left = mid + 1;
        else right = mid - 1;
    }
}
return -1;
medium
A. -1
B. 6
C. 0
D. 4

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the array and target

    The array is rotated: [4,5,6,7,0,1,2]. Target is 3, which is not in the array.
  2. Step 2: Trace the binary search steps

    Binary search checks mid and adjusts left/right. Since 3 is not present, loop ends and returns -1.
  3. Final Answer:

    -1 -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Target missing returns -1 [OK]
Hint: If target not found, binary search returns -1 [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Assuming target 3 is in array
  • Returning wrong index for missing target
  • Not updating left/right correctly
4. Identify the bug in this C# code snippet for searching target in rotated sorted array:
int left = 0, right = nums.Length - 1;
while (left < right) {
    int mid = (left + right) / 2;
    if (nums[mid] == target) return mid;
    if (nums[left] <= nums[mid]) {
        if (nums[left] <= target && target < nums[mid]) right = mid - 1;
        else left = mid + 1;
    } else {
        if (nums[mid] < target && target <= nums[right]) left = mid + 1;
        else right = mid - 1;
    }
}
return -1;
medium
A. The loop condition should be left <= right, not left < right
B. Mid calculation should be mid = left + (right - left) / 2
C. The target comparison operators are incorrect
D. The return -1 should be inside the loop

Solution

  1. Step 1: Analyze loop condition

    The loop uses left < right, which misses the case when left == right, possibly skipping the last element check.
  2. Step 2: Correct loop condition for binary search

    Binary search requires left <= right to ensure all elements are checked, including when left equals right.
  3. Final Answer:

    The loop condition should be left <= right, not left < right -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Use left <= right for complete search [OK]
Hint: Use <= in loop condition to check all elements [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using < instead of <= in loop
  • Incorrect mid calculation causing overflow
  • Misplaced return statements
5. Given a rotated sorted array int[] nums = {15, 18, 2, 3, 6, 12};, write a C# method to find the index of target 3 using binary search in rotated array. What is the returned index?
hard
A. 2
B. 3
C. 4
D. -1

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the array and target

    The array is rotated: [15, 18, 2, 3, 6, 12]. Target is 3, which is present at index 3.
  2. Step 2: Apply binary search in rotated array

    Using the binary search logic for rotated arrays, the search will find target 3 at index 3.
  3. Final Answer:

    3 -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Target 3 found at index 3 [OK]
Hint: Trace mid and adjust left/right to find target index [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing index of 3 with nearby elements
  • Not handling rotation correctly
  • Returning -1 for existing target
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard