We want to find a number in a list that was sorted but then rotated, by smartly checking halves instead of scanning all.
Analogy: Imagine a clock face where numbers are in order but the clock is turned so 12 is not at the top. To find a number, you check if it's in the left or right half by comparing with the middle, like checking which side of the clock the number is on.
using System;
class RotatedSortedArraySearch
{
public static int Search(int[] nums, int target)
{
int left = 0, right = nums.Length - 1;
while (left <= right)
{
int mid = left + (right - left) / 2;
if (nums[mid] == target)
return mid; // found target
if (nums[left] <= nums[mid]) // left half sorted
{
if (nums[left] <= target && target < nums[mid])
right = mid - 1; // target in left half
else
left = mid + 1; // target in right half
}
else // right half sorted
{
if (nums[mid] < target && target <= nums[right])
left = mid + 1; // target in right half
else
right = mid - 1; // target in left half
}
}
return -1; // target not found
}
static void Main()
{
int[] nums = {4, 5, 6, 7, 0, 1, 2};
int target = 0;
int index = Search(nums, target);
if (index != -1)
Console.WriteLine($"Target {target} found at index {index}");
else
Console.WriteLine($"Target {target} not found");
}
}
int mid = left + (right - left) / 2;
Calculate middle index to split search range
if (nums[mid] == target) return mid;
Check if middle element is target
if (nums[left] <= nums[mid])
Check if left half is sorted
if (nums[left] <= target && target < nums[mid]) right = mid - 1;
If target in sorted left half, move right pointer
else left = mid + 1;
Else search right half
else
Right half must be sorted
if (nums[mid] < target && target <= nums[right]) left = mid + 1;
If target in sorted right half, move left pointer
else right = mid - 1;
Else search left half
OutputSuccess
Target 0 found at index 4
Complexity Analysis
Time: O(log n) because each step halves the search range
Space: O(1) because only a few variables are used regardless of input size
vs Alternative: Compared to linear search O(n), this binary search approach is much faster for large arrays
Edge Cases
Empty array
Returns -1 immediately as no elements to search
DSA C#
int right = nums.Length - 1;
Array with one element equal to target
Returns index 0 immediately
DSA C#
if (nums[mid] == target) return mid;
Array with one element not equal to target
Returns -1 after checking single element
DSA C#
while (left <= right)
Target not in array
Returns -1 after search completes
DSA C#
return -1;
When to Use This Pattern
When you see a sorted array that is rotated and need to find an element quickly, use this modified binary search to identify sorted halves and narrow search efficiently.
Common Mistakes
Mistake: Not checking which half is sorted before deciding where to search next Fix: Always compare nums[left] and nums[mid] to find sorted half before moving pointers
Mistake: Using <= or < incorrectly causing infinite loops or missed targets Fix: Use consistent comparison operators to correctly include or exclude mid element in ranges
Summary
Finds target index in a rotated sorted array using modified binary search.
Use when array is sorted but rotated and you want fast search.
Key insight: one half is always sorted, use that to decide where target lies.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What is the main challenge when searching in a rotated sorted array compared to a normal sorted array?
easy
A. The array is sorted in descending order instead of ascending
B. The array contains duplicate elements that confuse the search
C. The array is split into two sorted parts, making normal binary search invalid directly
D. The array size is always odd, which affects indexing
Solution
Step 1: Understand the array structure
A rotated sorted array is created by taking a sorted array and rotating it at some pivot. This splits it into two sorted parts.
Step 2: Why normal binary search fails
Normal binary search assumes the entire array is sorted. Here, because of rotation, one half is sorted and the other may not be, so direct binary search won't work.
Final Answer:
The array is split into two sorted parts, making normal binary search invalid directly -> Option C
Quick Check:
Rotation splits array = challenge for binary search [OK]
Hint: Look for the pivot splitting the array into two sorted parts [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Assuming the whole array is sorted
Ignoring the pivot point
Confusing rotation with reversal
2. Which of the following C# code snippets correctly initializes variables for binary search in a rotated sorted array?
easy
A. int left = -1, right = nums.Length - 1;
B. int left = 1, right = nums.Length;
C. int left = 0, right = nums.Length;
D. int left = 0, right = nums.Length - 1;
Solution
Step 1: Understand array indexing in C#
Arrays are zero-indexed, so the first element is at 0 and the last at Length - 1.
Step 2: Correct initialization for binary search
Binary search starts with left at 0 and right at last index (Length - 1). This covers the entire array.
Final Answer:
int left = 0, right = nums.Length - 1; -> Option D
Quick Check:
Zero-based indexing means right = Length - 1 [OK]
Hint: Start left at 0 and right at last index (Length - 1) [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Setting right to Length instead of Length - 1
Starting left at 1 instead of 0
Using negative indices
3. What will be the output of the following C# code snippet searching for target 3 in rotated array int[] nums = {4,5,6,7,0,1,2};?
int left = 0, right = nums.Length - 1;
int target = 3;
while (left <= right) {
int mid = left + (right - left) / 2;
if (nums[mid] == target) return mid;
if (nums[left] <= nums[mid]) {
if (nums[left] <= target && target < nums[mid]) right = mid - 1;
else left = mid + 1;
} else {
if (nums[mid] < target && target <= nums[right]) left = mid + 1;
else right = mid - 1;
}
}
return -1;
medium
A. -1
B. 6
C. 0
D. 4
Solution
Step 1: Understand the array and target
The array is rotated: [4,5,6,7,0,1,2]. Target is 3, which is not in the array.
Step 2: Trace the binary search steps
Binary search checks mid and adjusts left/right. Since 3 is not present, loop ends and returns -1.
Final Answer:
-1 -> Option A
Quick Check:
Target missing returns -1 [OK]
Hint: If target not found, binary search returns -1 [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Assuming target 3 is in array
Returning wrong index for missing target
Not updating left/right correctly
4. Identify the bug in this C# code snippet for searching target in rotated sorted array:
int left = 0, right = nums.Length - 1;
while (left < right) {
int mid = (left + right) / 2;
if (nums[mid] == target) return mid;
if (nums[left] <= nums[mid]) {
if (nums[left] <= target && target < nums[mid]) right = mid - 1;
else left = mid + 1;
} else {
if (nums[mid] < target && target <= nums[right]) left = mid + 1;
else right = mid - 1;
}
}
return -1;
medium
A. The loop condition should be left <= right, not left < right
B. Mid calculation should be mid = left + (right - left) / 2
C. The target comparison operators are incorrect
D. The return -1 should be inside the loop
Solution
Step 1: Analyze loop condition
The loop uses left < right, which misses the case when left == right, possibly skipping the last element check.
Step 2: Correct loop condition for binary search
Binary search requires left <= right to ensure all elements are checked, including when left equals right.
Final Answer:
The loop condition should be left <= right, not left < right -> Option A
Quick Check:
Use left <= right for complete search [OK]
Hint: Use <= in loop condition to check all elements [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using < instead of <= in loop
Incorrect mid calculation causing overflow
Misplaced return statements
5. Given a rotated sorted array int[] nums = {15, 18, 2, 3, 6, 12};, write a C# method to find the index of target 3 using binary search in rotated array. What is the returned index?
hard
A. 2
B. 3
C. 4
D. -1
Solution
Step 1: Understand the array and target
The array is rotated: [15, 18, 2, 3, 6, 12]. Target is 3, which is present at index 3.
Step 2: Apply binary search in rotated array
Using the binary search logic for rotated arrays, the search will find target 3 at index 3.
Final Answer:
3 -> Option B
Quick Check:
Target 3 found at index 3 [OK]
Hint: Trace mid and adjust left/right to find target index [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing index of 3 with nearby elements
Not handling rotation correctly
Returning -1 for existing target
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.