Assuming it sorts from most significant digit first
2. Which of the following is the correct way to initialize a queue in C# for use in Radix Sort?
easy
A. Queue<int> buckets = new Queue<int>[10];
B. Queue<int> buckets = new Queue<int>(10);
C. Queue buckets = new Queue<int>(10);
D. Queue<int>[] buckets = new Queue<int>[10];
Solution
Step 1: Understand array of queues declaration
We need an array of 10 queues, so the correct syntax is an array of Queue<int>: Queue<int>[] buckets = new Queue<int>[10];
Step 2: Check other options
Queue<int> buckets = new Queue<int>[10]; tries to assign an array to a single Queue<int> variable, which is invalid. Queue buckets = new Queue<int>(10); uses non-generic Queue incorrectly. Queue<int> buckets = new Queue<int>(10); creates a single Queue with capacity 10, not an array.
Final Answer:
Queue<int>[] buckets = new Queue<int>[10]; -> Option D
Quick Check:
Array of queues = Queue<int>[] [OK]
Hint: Use [] to declare array of queues in C# [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Declaring a single queue instead of an array
Using non-generic Queue instead of Queue<int>
Confusing array initialization syntax
3. What will be the output of the following C# code snippet using Radix Sort on the array [170, 45, 75, 90, 802, 24, 2, 66]?
Radix Sort sorts numbers by digits from least significant to most significant. After sorting, the array becomes sorted in ascending order: 2, 24, 45, 66, 75, 90, 170, 802.
Step 2: Verify output matches sorted array
[2, 24, 45, 66, 75, 90, 170, 802] matches the sorted array. [170, 45, 75, 90, 802, 24, 2, 66] is original unsorted. [802, 170, 90, 75, 66, 45, 24, 2] is descending order. [24, 2, 45, 66, 75, 90, 170, 802] is incorrect order.
4. Identify the error in this Radix Sort code snippet in C#:
for (int i = 0; i < maxDigit; i++)
{
Queue<int>[] buckets = new Queue<int>[10];
for (int j = 0; j < 10; j++)
buckets[j] = new Queue<int>();
foreach (int num in arr)
{
int digit = (num / (int)Math.Pow(10, i)) % 10;
buckets[digit].Enqueue(num);
}
int index = 0;
foreach (var bucket in buckets)
{
while (bucket.Count > 0)
arr[index++] = bucket.Dequeue();
}
}
medium
A. The inner foreach loop should use a for loop instead
B. The digit calculation is incorrect; it should use modulus 100
C. There is no error in the code snippet
D. The buckets array is reinitialized inside the outer loop, causing loss of data
Solution
Step 1: Analyze the code structure
The code correctly creates fresh buckets for each digit position, distributes all elements by the current digit using stable queues, and reconstructs the array in place. This is proper LSD Radix Sort implementation.
Step 2: Evaluate options
A: foreach loops are fine for iterating arr and buckets. B: (num / pow(10,i)) % 10 correctly extracts the i-th digit from LSD. C: Reinitializing buckets each pass prevents carry-over from previous passes and does not lose data since all elements are re-enqueued from arr every iteration.
Final Answer:
There is no error in the code snippet -> Option C
Quick Check:
Buckets reinitialized each pass = Correct [OK]
Hint: Buckets reset each digit pass is required, not an error [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Thinking buckets reinitialization causes data loss
Misunderstanding digit extraction formula
Resetting index inside wrong loop
5. You want to adapt Radix Sort to sort an array of strings representing numbers with varying lengths (e.g., ["170", "45", "9", "802", "24"]). Which approach is best to handle different string lengths correctly?
hard
A. Pad shorter strings with leading zeros to match the longest length before sorting
B. Sort strings as they are without padding, digit by digit from left to right
C. Convert strings to integers and apply normal Radix Sort
D. Sort strings by length first, then apply Radix Sort on digits
Solution
Step 1: Understand problem with varying string lengths
Radix Sort requires uniform digit positions. Strings of different lengths cause misalignment when sorting digit by digit.
Step 2: Choose padding strategy
Padding shorter strings with leading zeros makes all strings equal length, allowing digit-by-digit sorting from right to left correctly.
Step 3: Evaluate other options
Sort strings as they are without padding, digit by digit from left to right sorts left to right which breaks Radix Sort logic. Convert strings to integers and apply normal Radix Sort loses string format and may cause overflow. Sort strings by length first, then apply Radix Sort on digits sorting by length first does not solve digit alignment.
Final Answer:
Pad shorter strings with leading zeros to match the longest length before sorting -> Option A
Quick Check:
Pad strings to equal length = Correct approach [OK]
Hint: Pad strings with zeros to equal length before sorting [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Sorting strings without padding causes wrong order
Sorting digits left to right breaks Radix Sort
Converting strings to int may cause errors with large numbers
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.