Tabulation Bottom Up DP in DSA C - Time & Space Complexity
We want to understand how fast a bottom-up dynamic programming solution runs as the input size grows.
Specifically, how the number of steps changes when we fill the table from the smallest subproblems up.
Analyze the time complexity of the following code snippet.
int fib(int n) {
int dp[n+1];
dp[0] = 0;
dp[1] = 1;
for (int i = 2; i <= n; i++) {
dp[i] = dp[i-1] + dp[i-2];
}
return dp[n];
}
This code calculates the nth Fibonacci number using bottom-up tabulation.
Identify the loops, recursion, array traversals that repeat.
- Primary operation: The for-loop that fills the dp array from 2 to n.
- How many times: Exactly n-1 times (from 2 up to n).
Each new input number adds one more step to fill the dp table.
| Input Size (n) | Approx. Operations |
|---|---|
| 10 | About 9 steps |
| 100 | About 99 steps |
| 1000 | About 999 steps |
Pattern observation: The number of steps grows roughly in a straight line as n increases.
Time Complexity: O(n)
This means the time to compute grows directly in proportion to the input size.
[X] Wrong: "Dynamic programming always takes exponential time because it solves many subproblems."
[OK] Correct: Bottom-up DP solves each subproblem once and stores the result, so it runs in linear time here, not exponential.
Understanding how bottom-up DP reduces repeated work is a key skill that shows you can write efficient code for problems with overlapping subproblems.
"What if we changed the loop to compute dp[i] using three previous values instead of two? How would the time complexity change?"
Practice
Tabulation Bottom Up DP in dynamic programming?Solution
Step 1: Understand the DP approach
Tabulation means filling a table starting from the smallest subproblems.Step 2: Compare with other methods
Unlike recursion without storage, tabulation avoids repeated work by building up solutions.Final Answer:
Build a table from the smallest subproblems up to the main problem -> Option AQuick Check:
Bottom Up DP = Build table from small to big [OK]
- Confusing tabulation with recursion without memoization
- Thinking tabulation starts from the biggest problem
- Assuming tabulation guesses solutions randomly
Solution
Step 1: Check C array declaration syntax
In C, arrays are declared with size and type, e.g., int dp[100];Step 2: Identify correct initialization
int dp[100] = {0}; declares an int array of size 100 initialized to zero, suitable for DP table.Final Answer:
int dp[100] = {0}; -> Option BQuick Check:
C arrays need size and type [OK]
- Using parentheses instead of brackets for arrays
- Not specifying array size
- Assigning integer to array variable
#include
int main() {
int n = 5;
int dp[6] = {0};
dp[0] = 0;
dp[1] = 1;
for(int i = 2; i <= n; i++) {
dp[i] = dp[i-1] + dp[i-2];
}
printf("%d", dp[n]);
return 0;
}Solution
Step 1: Trace DP table filling
dp[0]=0, dp[1]=1; then dp[2]=1, dp[3]=2, dp[4]=3, dp[5]=5.Step 2: Identify dp[n] value
dp[5] = 5, so output is 5.Final Answer:
5 -> Option DQuick Check:
Fibonacci(5) = 5 [OK]
- Off-by-one errors in loop range
- Confusing dp indices with Fibonacci numbers
- Printing dp[n-1] instead of dp[n]
int fib(int n) {
int dp[n+1];
dp[0] = 0;
dp[1] = 1;
for(int i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
dp[i] = dp[i-1] + dp[i-2];
}
return dp[n];
}Solution
Step 1: Check loop start index
Loop starts at i=1, but dp[i-2] for i=1 is dp[-1], invalid index.Step 2: Correct loop start
Loop should start at i=2 to avoid negative index access.Final Answer:
Loop starts at 1 instead of 2 causing invalid access -> Option CQuick Check:
Loop must start at 2 to access dp[i-2] safely [OK]
- Starting loop at 1 causing negative index
- Ignoring array bounds in DP
- Returning wrong dp index
int coins[] = {1, 3, 4};
int amount = 7;
int dp[8];
dp[0] = 0;
for (int i = 1; i <= amount; i++) {
dp[i] = INT_MAX;
for (int j = 0; j < 3; j++) {
if (coins[j] <= i && dp[i - coins[j]] != INT_MAX) {
dp[i] = dp[i] < dp[i - coins[j]] + 1 ? dp[i] : dp[i - coins[j]] + 1;
}
}
}
printf("%d", dp[amount]);Solution
Step 1: Calculate dp values step-by-step
dp[0]=0 For i=1: dp[1]=1 (coin 1) For i=2: dp[2]=2 (1+1) For i=3: dp[3]=1 (coin 3) For i=4: dp[4]=1 (coin 4) For i=5: dp[5]=2 (4+1) For i=6: dp[6]=2 (3+3) For i=7: dp[7]=2 (3+4)Step 2: Identify minimum coins for amount 7
Minimum coins needed for 7 is 2.Final Answer:
2 -> Option AQuick Check:
Minimum coins for 7 = 2 [OK]
- Not updating dp[i] with minimum value
- Ignoring INT_MAX checks causing wrong results
- Confusing coin values and indices
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown
