Bird
Raised Fist0
Interview Prepmath-geometryeasyAmazonGoogleBloomberg

Happy Number (Digit Sum Cycle)

Choose your preparation mode4 modes available
▶
Steps
setup

Initialize unhappy cycle set and start number

We define the set of known unhappy cycle numbers and initialize n with the input 19.

💡 This setup is crucial because the unhappy cycle set helps us detect loops that mean the number is not happy.
Line:unhappy_cycle = {4, 16, 37, 58, 89, 145, 42, 20} n = 19
💡 The unhappy cycle set is a fixed known set that the algorithm uses to detect infinite loops.
📊
Happy Number (Digit Sum Cycle) - Watch the Algorithm Execute, Step by Step
Watching each transformation and decision helps you understand how the algorithm detects cycles and confirms happiness without guessing.
Step 1/20
·Active fill★Answer cell
setup
n
1
0
9
1
compare
n
1
0
9
1
setup
n
1
0
num
9
1
Result: 0
fill_cells
n
1
0
num
9
1
Result: 81
fill_cells
n
1
0
9
1
Result: 82
insert
n
8
0
2
1
Result: 82
compare
n
8
0
2
1
Result: 82
fill_cells
n
8
0
num
2
1
Result: 4
fill_cells
n
8
0
2
1
Result: 68
insert
n
6
0
8
1
Result: 68
compare
n
6
0
8
1
Result: 68
fill_cells
n
6
0
num
8
1
Result: 64
fill_cells
n
6
0
8
1
Result: 100
insert
n
1
0
0
1
0
2
Result: 100
compare
n
1
0
0
1
0
2
Result: 100
fill_cells
n
1
0
0
1
num
0
2
Result: 0
fill_cells
n
1
0
num
0
1
0
2
Result: 0
fill_cells
n
1
0
0
1
0
2
Result: 1
insert
n
1
0
Result: 1
prune
n
1
0
Result: true

Key Takeaways

✓ The algorithm transforms the number by repeatedly summing the squares of its digits until it reaches 1 or a known unhappy cycle.

This iterative transformation is hard to visualize from code alone but becomes clear when watching each digit processed.

✓ Known unhappy cycle numbers allow the algorithm to detect infinite loops and stop early.

Understanding the role of this set is easier when you see the algorithm check membership at each iteration.

✓ Digit extraction and squaring is the core operation repeated every iteration, driving the number's evolution.

Seeing each digit extracted and squared step-by-step clarifies how the sum is computed.

Practice

(1/5)
1. Given an integer, determine if it reads the same backward as forward without converting it to a string. Which approach guarantees an optimal solution in terms of time and space complexity?
easy
A. Convert the integer to a string and compare characters from both ends.
B. Use a greedy approach to compare digits from left to right until mismatch.
C. Reverse half of the integer digits and compare with the other half.
D. Use dynamic programming to store palindrome states of digit substrings.

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the problem constraints

    We want to check if an integer is a palindrome without extra space and efficiently.
  2. Step 2: Evaluate approaches

    Converting to string uses extra space; DP is overkill and not applicable; greedy fails on some cases. Reversing half the number uses O(1) space and O(log n) time.
  3. Final Answer:

    Option C -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Reversing half the digits avoids overflow and extra space [OK]
Hint: Optimal uses half reversal, not full string conversion [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Thinking string conversion is optimal
  • Using DP unnecessarily
  • Greedy fails on middle digits
2. Consider the following code snippet that checks if a number is a palindrome by reversing half of its digits. What is the value of reversed_half after the second iteration of the while loop when input is 12321?
easy
A. 12
B. 1
C. 21
D. 123

Solution

  1. Step 1: Trace first iteration

    Initial x=12321, reversed_half=0 reversed_half = 0*10 + 12321%10 = 1 x = 12321 // 10 = 1232
  2. Step 2: Trace second iteration

    reversed_half = 1*10 + 1232%10 = 10 + 2 = 12 x = 1232 // 10 = 123
  3. Final Answer:

    Option A -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    After two iterations reversed_half is 12 [OK]
Hint: Track variable updates carefully each loop iteration [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Off-by-one iteration count
  • Mixing x and reversed_half values
  • Incorrect modulo or division
3. You need to reverse the digits of a 32-bit signed integer, returning 0 if the reversed integer overflows. Which approach guarantees an optimal solution that handles overflow correctly without converting the integer to a string?
easy
A. Greedy approach that swaps digits from ends until the middle is reached
B. Dynamic programming to store reversed prefixes and build the result
C. Brute force string conversion and reversal without overflow checks
D. Recursive digit extraction with overflow checks before each digit append

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand problem constraints

    The problem requires reversing digits without string conversion and must handle overflow safely.
  2. Step 2: Identify approach that meets constraints

    Recursive digit extraction with overflow checks ensures digits are reversed one by one and stops if overflow would occur, guaranteeing correctness and optimality.
  3. Final Answer:

    Option D -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Recursive digit extraction handles overflow and sign correctly [OK]
Hint: Overflow-safe digit extraction is key [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using string reversal without overflow checks
  • Greedy swaps fail on overflow
  • DP is unnecessary overhead
4. What is the time complexity of the optimal approach that uses a hash set and checks pairs of points as diagonals to find the minimum area rectangle, given n points?
medium
A. O(n^4) because all quadruples of points are checked
B. O(n^2) because all pairs of points are checked and hash set lookups are O(1)
C. O(n^3) because for each pair, a linear search is done for complementary points
D. O(n log n) because points are sorted and then pairs are checked

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify loops in the optimal approach

    The code iterates over all pairs of points (i,j), which is O(n^2).
  2. Step 2: Analyze point existence checks

    Checking if complementary points exist uses a hash set with O(1) average lookup, so no extra multiplicative factor.
  3. Final Answer:

    Option B -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Double loop + O(1) lookup -> O(n^2) time [OK]
Hint: Pairs checked, hash lookups O(1) -> O(n^2) [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing with brute force O(n^4)
  • Assuming linear search inside pairs causes O(n^3)
5. Consider the following buggy code for Roman to Integer conversion. Which line contains the subtle bug that causes incorrect results for inputs like "IV" or "IX"?
medium
A. Line with 'result += curr'
B. Line with 'next_val = value(s[i + 1]) if i + 1 < len(s) else 0'
C. Line with 'curr = value(s[i])'
D. Line with 'if curr <= next_val:'

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify the condition for subtraction

    The correct condition is to subtract only when current value is strictly less than next value, not when equal.
  2. Step 2: Analyze the buggy condition

    The code uses 'if curr <= next_val:', which incorrectly subtracts when values are equal, causing wrong results for cases like 'IV' or 'IX'.
  3. Final Answer:

    Option D -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Changing '<=' to '<' fixes the bug [OK]
Hint: Subtraction only if current < next, not <= [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using <= instead of <
  • Forgetting boundary checks
  • Wrong value mappings
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard