0
0

Feasibility / Practicality Based Assumptions

Introduction

कई reasoning questions में सुझाव या सिफारिशें दी जाती हैं। लेकिन हर सुझाव अपने-आप valid नहीं होता - उसे जरूरी और संभव दोनों होना चाहिए। ऐसे questions यह जाँचते हैं कि किसी कथन के पीछे कौन-सी feasibility या practicality assumptions छिपी हैं।

यह पैटर्न इसलिए महत्वपूर्ण है क्योंकि व्यावहारिक reasoning मानकर चलती है कि सुझाया गया action वास्तव में लागू किया जा सकता है और वह अपने लक्ष्य को हासिल करने में मदद करेगा।

Pattern: Feasibility / Practicality Based Assumptions

Pattern

मुख्य विचार: कोई भी recommendation यह मानकर चलती है कि (1) सुझाया गया action practically संभव है, और (2) वह action इच्छित परिणाम हासिल करने में मदद करेगा।

ये assumptions policies, reforms, bans या solutions जैसे statements में दिखती हैं - जहाँ feasibility और effectiveness दोनों महत्वपूर्ण होते हैं।

Step-by-Step Example

Question

Statement: “The government should ban plastic bags to reduce pollution.”
कौन-सी assumptions implicit हैं?
A. Plastic bags environment के लिए हानिकारक हैं।
B. Government इस ban को सफलतापूर्वक लागू कर सकती है।
C. Both A and B.
D. Neither A nor B.

Solution

  1. Step 1: कथन की प्रकृति पहचानें

    यह एक recommendation है - इसलिए मान लिया जाता है कि plastic ban करना आवश्यक भी है और संभव भी।

  2. Step 2: assumptions का विश्लेषण

    Assumption A implicit है - अगर plastic pollution का कारण न होता, तो ban का सुझाव निरर्थक होता।
    Assumption B implicit है - यदि government ban लागू न कर सके, तो recommendation व्यावहारिक रूप से बेकार हो जाता।

  3. Final Answer:

    A और B दोनों implicit हैं। → Option C

  4. Quick Check:

    यदि ban लागू ही न हो सके या plastic हानिकारक न हो, तो सुझाव अर्थहीन हो जाता। ✅

Quick Variations

1. Policy feasibility: “The city should build more public parks.” → implicit: funds और space उपलब्ध हैं।

2. Implementation-based: “The school should conduct online classes.” → implicit: students के पास devices और internet हैं।

3. Enforcement-based: “The government must ensure clean drinking water in every village.” → implicit: resources और infrastructure मौजूद हैं।

4. Technical feasibility: “Factories should switch to solar power.” → implicit: solar energy practically affordable और उपलब्ध है।

Trick to Always Use

  • Step 1 → देखें कि सुझाया गया action practically implement किया जा सकता है या नहीं।
  • Step 2 → जाँचें कि suggestion यह मानकर चल रहा है कि action से positive effect मिलेगा।
  • Step 3 → ऐसी assumptions निकाल दें जो केवल idealistic हों या feasibility से संबंधित न हों।

Summary

Summary

  • Feasibility-based assumptions हमेशा possibility + effectiveness की जाँच करती हैं।
  • यदि कोई suggestion दिया गया है, तो implicit है कि उसे वर्तमान स्थिति में लागू किया जा सकता है।
  • साथ ही implicit है कि उसे लागू करने से समस्या हल होगी।
  • ऐसे statements जो practical limits को नज़रअंदाज़ करते हैं, valid assumptions नहीं होते।

याद रखने का उदाहरण:
Statement: “Schools should go paperless.” → Implicit: technology उपलब्ध है और digital study effective है।

Practice

(1/5)
1. Statement: "The government should introduce electric buses to reduce air pollution."<br>Assumptions:<br>1️⃣ Electric buses cause less pollution than diesel buses.<br>2️⃣ The government can immediately afford to buy and maintain electric buses.<br>Which assumption(s) is/are implicit?
easy
A. Both 1 and 2
B. Only 1
C. Only 2
D. Neither 1 nor 2

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify the claimed benefit

    The statement links electric buses directly to reduced air pollution - that requires the belief that electric buses produce less pollution.

  2. Step 2: Test Assumption 1

    Belief that electric buses are cleaner is necessary for the recommendation - therefore implicit.

  3. Step 3: Test Assumption 2

    The claim does not necessarily assert that the government has immediate funds; affordability might be solved by loans, phased purchase, or private partnerships - so immediate affordability is not implicitly assumed.

  4. Final Answer:

    Only 1 is implicit. → Option B

  5. Quick Check:

    If electric buses weren’t cleaner, the recommendation would lack rationale; affordability can be arranged separately ✅
Hint: Separate the benefit assumption (cleaner tech) from implementation/affordability assumptions.
Common Mistakes: Assuming a recommendation always implies immediate funding availability.
2. Statement: "The city should install solar panels on government buildings."<br>Assumptions:<br>1️⃣ Solar energy is a reliable and sustainable power source for the city’s needs.<br>2️⃣ Government buildings have adequate rooftop space and structural suitability for panels.<br>Which assumption(s) is/are implicit?
easy
A. Only 1
B. Only 2
C. Both 1 and 2
D. Neither 1 nor 2

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify the proposal’s two requirements

    Installing solar panels is both a technical (energy source) and logistical (space/structure) action.

  2. Step 2: Test Assumption 1

    If solar energy were unreliable for the city’s needs, recommending installation on public buildings wouldn’t make sense - so reliability/sustainability is implicit.

  3. Step 3: Test Assumption 2

    If roofs were unsuitable or too small, the plan could not be implemented as stated - so structural/space suitability is implicit.

  4. Final Answer:

    Both 1 and 2 are implicit. → Option C

  5. Quick Check:

    Technical proposals typically assume both the solution works and the place to put it exists ✅
Hint: Technical recommendations assume both effectiveness and implementability.
Common Mistakes: Focusing on only the technology and ignoring physical constraints.
3. Statement: "The school should provide free tablets to students to ensure internet access at home."<br>Assumptions:<br>1️⃣ Tablets will necessarily improve learning outcomes.<br>2️⃣ The school (or its funders) can secure and distribute enough tablets to cover students lacking access.<br>Which assumption(s) is/are implicit?
medium
A. Only 2
B. Both 1 and 2
C. Only 1
D. Neither 1 nor 2

Solution

  1. Step 1: Note the stated purpose

    The statement’s purpose is explicit: provide tablets to ensure internet access at home (focus on access, not guaranteed learning improvement).

  2. Step 2: Test Assumption 1

    While tablets can help, the statement does not claim they will necessarily improve learning outcomes (many other factors affect learning) - improvement is not implicitly guaranteed.

  3. Step 3: Test Assumption 2

    The proposal presumes the school/funders can obtain and distribute sufficient devices - this logistical/cost assumption is required and therefore implicit.

  4. Final Answer:

    Only 2 is implicit. → Option A

  5. Quick Check:

    Access-focused proposals assume supply/distribution capacity; learning gains are desirable but not automatically assumed ✅
Hint: Distinguish access (implicit) from guaranteed outcomes (not necessarily implicit).
Common Mistakes: Assuming capacity to deliver equals guaranteed improvement.
4. Statement: "The company should switch to a four-day work week."<br>Assumptions:<br>1️⃣ A shorter work week will increase employee productivity.<br>2️⃣ The company can maintain required operations with one fewer workday.<br>Which assumption(s) is/are implicit?
medium
A. Only 1
B. Both 1 and 2
C. Only 2
D. Neither 1 nor 2

Solution

  1. Step 1: Observe neutral wording

    The statement is a general policy suggestion (no reason like 'to increase productivity' or 'to cut costs' is attached).

  2. Step 2: Test Assumption 1

    Because no purpose is specified, the statement does not necessarily assume productivity will increase - that is a possible motive, but not implicit in this neutral recommendation.

  3. Step 3: Test Assumption 2

    Similarly, the statement does not implicitly claim the company can maintain operations without loss; operational viability is a separate evaluation, not automatically assumed by the neutral suggestion.

  4. Final Answer:

    Neither 1 nor 2 is implicit. → Option D

  5. Quick Check:

    Neutral policy proposals do not always carry hidden practical assumptions unless a specific benefit or feasibility claim is attached ✅
Hint: If no purpose or effect is stated, avoid assuming specific benefits or feasibility automatically.
Common Mistakes: Reading unstated motives into neutral policy suggestions.
5. Statement: "Local authorities should build rainwater harvesting systems in all public buildings."<br>Assumptions:<br>1️⃣ Rainwater harvesting effectively conserves and supplements water supply.<br>2️⃣ Local authorities have the administrative capacity and funds to construct and maintain such systems across public buildings.<br>Which assumption(s) is/are implicit?
medium
A. Both 1 and 2
B. Only 2
C. Only 1
D. Neither 1 nor 2

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify policy goals

    The proposal aims at water conservation and widespread implementation across public buildings.

  2. Step 2: Test Assumption 1

    If harvesting did not conserve or meaningfully supplement water, recommending it would be pointless - so effectiveness is implicit.

  3. Step 3: Test Assumption 2

    Widespread installation implies administrative capacity and funding to implement and maintain systems - this feasibility assumption is also implicit.

  4. Final Answer:

    Both 1 and 2 are implicit. → Option A

  5. Quick Check:

    Public infrastructure proposals rely on both benefit and institutional capacity assumptions ✅
Hint: Public infrastructure suggestions assume both effectiveness and implementation capacity.
Common Mistakes: Assuming a proposal implies only benefit and forgetting implementation limits.

Mock Test

Ready for a challenge?

Take a 10-minute AI-powered test with 10 questions (Easy-Medium-Hard mix) and get instant SWOT analysis of your performance!

10 Questions
5 Minutes