Introduction
Part-Whole analogies test your ability to recognise when one term is a component, member, or constituent of another. This pattern is important because many reasoning questions ask you to map parts to their wholes (or vice-versa) quickly and accurately.
Pattern: Part–Whole Relationship
Pattern
The key concept is: identify whether the first pair shows a part → whole (or whole → part) relationship, then apply that same directional relationship to complete the second pair.
Step-by-Step Example
Question
Petal : Flower :: Leaf : ______
(A) Plant (B) Tree (C) Branch (D) Fruit
Solution
-
Step 1: Identify the relationship in the first pair.
A Petal is a part of a Flower - this is a part → whole relationship. -
Step 2: Apply the same direction to the second pair.
A Leaf is a part of a Plant (the whole). Among the options, 'Plant' is the correct whole. -
Final Answer:
Plant → Option A -
Quick Check:
Petal : Flower (part → whole) and Leaf : Plant (part → whole) - relation matches ✅
Quick Variations
1. Whole → Part (e.g., Car : Engine :: Tree : ______ (Branch)).
2. Member → Group (e.g., Player : Team :: Soldier : Army).
3. Component → Assembly (e.g., Keyboard : Computer :: Wheel : Bicycle).
4. Fractional parts (e.g., Slice : Cake :: Page : Book).
Trick to Always Use
- Step 1 → Rephrase the pair as "X is part of Y" or "Y contains X" to lock direction.
- Step 2 → Try each option in that sentence - the one that reads naturally is the correct choice.
Summary
Summary
- Determine direction first: is it part → whole or whole → part?
- Convert the relation into a short sentence: "X is part of Y" or "Y contains X".
- Substitute each option into that sentence; choose the one that makes a correct factual statement.
- Eliminate options that are related but not the correct part/whole (e.g., similar objects or functions).
Example to remember:
Petal : Flower :: Leaf : Plant
