Bird
Raised Fist0
Typescriptprogramming~20 mins

Type narrowing with typeof in Typescript - Practice Problems & Coding Challenges

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Challenge - 5 Problems
🎖️
Type Narrowing Master
Get all challenges correct to earn this badge!
Test your skills under time pressure!
❓ Predict Output
intermediate
2:00remaining
Output of type narrowing with typeof in conditional
What is the output of this TypeScript code when run with input = 42?
Typescript
function checkType(input: string | number) {
  if (typeof input === 'string') {
    return input.toUpperCase();
  } else {
    return input + 10;
  }
}
console.log(checkType(42));
A42
BTypeError at runtime
C52
Dundefined
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Think about what happens when input is a number and you add 10.
❓ Predict Output
intermediate
2:00remaining
Type narrowing effect on union types
What will this code output when value = true?
Typescript
function process(value: string | boolean) {
  if (typeof value === 'boolean') {
    return value ? 'Yes' : 'No';
  } else {
    return value.length;
  }
}
console.log(process(true));
Atrue
BTypeError: value.length is not a function
C"true"
D"Yes"
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Check the typeof condition and what happens for booleans.
🔧 Debug
advanced
2:00remaining
Identify the runtime error caused by incorrect type narrowing
What error does this code produce when data = 123?
Typescript
function formatData(data: string | number) {
  if (typeof data === 'string') {
    return data.trim();
  } else if (typeof data === 'number') {
    return data.toFixed(2);
  }
  return data;
}
console.log(formatData(123));
Aundefined
B123.00
CSyntaxError
DTypeError: data.trim is not a function
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Check the typeof checks and methods called on each type.
❓ Predict Output
advanced
2:00remaining
Output when typeof narrowing misses a case
What is the output of this code when input = null?
Typescript
function checkInput(input: string | null) {
  if (typeof input === 'string') {
    return input.length;
  } else {
    return 'No string';
  }
}
console.log(checkInput(null));
A"No string"
BTypeError: Cannot read property 'length' of null
C0
Dnull
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Remember typeof null is 'object', not 'string'.
🧠 Conceptual
expert
2:00remaining
Why typeof narrowing is safer than direct property access
Why is using typeof to narrow types safer than directly accessing properties without checks in TypeScript?
ABecause typeof checks prevent runtime errors by ensuring the variable is the expected type before accessing properties or methods.
BBecause typeof changes the variable type permanently in the program.
CBecause direct property access always works regardless of type.
DBecause typeof automatically converts all types to strings.
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Think about what happens if you try to call a string method on a number.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What does the typeof operator do in TypeScript?
easy
A. It converts a variable to a string.
B. It changes the type of a variable.
C. It declares a new type.
D. It checks the type of a variable at runtime.

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the purpose of typeof

    The typeof operator is used to check the type of a variable during the program's execution (runtime).
  2. Step 2: Differentiate from other options

    It does not change, declare, or convert types; it only inspects the type.
  3. Final Answer:

    It checks the type of a variable at runtime. -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    typeof checks type at runtime [OK]
Hint: Remember: typeof tells you the type, it doesn't change it. [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Thinking typeof changes the variable's type
  • Confusing typeof with type declaration
  • Assuming typeof converts values to strings
2. Which of the following is the correct syntax to narrow a variable value to a string using typeof?
easy
A. if (typeof value === 'string') { }
B. if (typeof value = 'string') { }
C. if (typeof value == string) { }
D. if (typeof value === string) { }

Solution

  1. Step 1: Check correct equality operator and string literal

    The correct way to compare is using triple equals === and the type name as a string literal, like 'string'.
  2. Step 2: Identify syntax errors in other options

    if (typeof value = 'string') { } uses single equals which is assignment, not comparison. Options A and C miss quotes around 'string'.
  3. Final Answer:

    if (typeof value === 'string') { } -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Use === and quotes for typeof checks [OK]
Hint: Use === and quotes around type names in typeof checks. [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using single = instead of ===
  • Forgetting quotes around type names
  • Using == instead of ===
3. What will be the output of this TypeScript code?
function checkType(x: string | number) {
  if (typeof x === 'string') {
    return x.toUpperCase();
  } else {
    return x + 10;
  }
}

console.log(checkType('hello'));
console.log(checkType(5));
medium
A. HELLO and 510
B. hello and 15
C. HELLO and 15
D. Error at runtime

Solution

  1. Step 1: Analyze the input 'hello'

    Since 'hello' is a string, typeof x === 'string' is true, so x.toUpperCase() returns 'HELLO'.
  2. Step 2: Analyze the input 5

    Since 5 is a number, the else block runs, returning 5 + 10 = 15.
  3. Final Answer:

    HELLO and 15 -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    String upper + number addition = HELLO, 15 [OK]
Hint: Check typeof to pick string or number logic correctly. [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Concatenating number and string instead of adding
  • Calling string methods on numbers
  • Confusing toUpperCase output
4. Identify the error in this TypeScript code using typeof for type narrowing:
function process(value: string | boolean) {
  if (typeof value === 'boolean') {
    return value.toUpperCase();
  } else {
    return value ? 'Yes' : 'No';
  }
}
medium
A. Calling toUpperCase on a boolean value
B. Using typeof with boolean type
C. Missing return type annotation
D. Incorrect if-else structure

Solution

  1. Step 1: Check the type narrowing condition

    The condition typeof value === 'boolean' correctly narrows value to boolean.
  2. Step 2: Identify method call on wrong type

    Inside this block, calling value.toUpperCase() is invalid because booleans do not have this method.
  3. Final Answer:

    Calling toUpperCase on a boolean value -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Boolean has no toUpperCase method [OK]
Hint: Check method calls match the narrowed type. [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Assuming booleans have string methods
  • Ignoring type narrowing effect
  • Confusing boolean and string logic
5. You have a function that accepts input: string | number | boolean. You want to return:
- The length of the string if input is a string,
- The number multiplied by 2 if input is a number,
- The string 'True' or 'False' if input is a boolean.

Which of the following implementations correctly uses typeof for type narrowing?
hard
A. function handle(input: string | number | boolean) { if (typeof input === 'boolean') { return input.length; } else if (typeof input === 'string') { return input * 2; } else { return input ? 'True' : 'False'; } }
B. function handle(input: string | number | boolean) { if (typeof input === 'string') { return input.length; } else if (typeof input === 'number') { return input * 2; } else { return input ? 'True' : 'False'; } }
C. function handle(input: string | number | boolean) { if (typeof input === 'number') { return input.length; } else if (typeof input === 'boolean') { return input * 2; } else { return input ? 'True' : 'False'; } }
D. function handle(input: string | number | boolean) { if (typeof input === 'string') { return input.toUpperCase(); } else if (typeof input === 'number') { return input + 2; } else { return input ? 'True' : 'False'; } }

Solution

  1. Step 1: Check string handling

    function handle(input: string | number | boolean) { if (typeof input === 'string') { return input.length; } else if (typeof input === 'number') { return input * 2; } else { return input ? 'True' : 'False'; } } returns input.length for strings, which is correct. function handle(input: string | number | boolean) { if (typeof input === 'string') { return input.toUpperCase(); } else if (typeof input === 'number') { return input + 2; } else { return input ? 'True' : 'False'; } } returns input.toUpperCase(), which is not requested.
  2. Step 2: Check number handling

    function handle(input: string | number | boolean) { if (typeof input === 'string') { return input.length; } else if (typeof input === 'number') { return input * 2; } else { return input ? 'True' : 'False'; } } multiplies number by 2, as required. function handle(input: string | number | boolean) { if (typeof input === 'string') { return input.toUpperCase(); } else if (typeof input === 'number') { return input + 2; } else { return input ? 'True' : 'False'; } } adds 2, which is incorrect. Options B and C misuse length or multiplication on wrong types.
  3. Step 3: Check boolean handling

    function handle(input: string | number | boolean) { if (typeof input === 'string') { return input.length; } else if (typeof input === 'number') { return input * 2; } else { return input ? 'True' : 'False'; } } returns 'True' or 'False' strings correctly. Others mix up boolean logic or return wrong types.
  4. Final Answer:

    function handle(input: string | number | boolean) { if (typeof input === 'string') { return input.length; } else if (typeof input === 'number') { return input * 2; } else { return input ? 'True' : 'False'; } } -> Option B
  5. Quick Check:

    Match typeof checks with correct operations [OK]
Hint: Match each typeof check with correct operation for that type. [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Calling string methods on numbers or booleans
  • Using length on numbers or booleans
  • Mixing up operations for each type
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard