Bird
Raised Fist0
Typescriptprogramming~10 mins

Duck typing mental model in TypeScript - Interactive Code Practice

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Practice - 5 Tasks
Answer the questions below
1fill in blank
easy

Complete the code to define an object that matches the interface by duck typing.

Typescript
interface Bird {
  fly(): void;
}

const duck: Bird = {
  [1]() {
    console.log('Flying');
  }
};
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Aswim
Bfly
Cwalk
Drun
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using a method name different from the interface, like 'swim' or 'walk'.
2fill in blank
medium

Complete the code to assign an object with extra properties to a variable typed by an interface.

Typescript
interface Person {
  name: string;
}

const user: Person = {
  name: 'Alice',
  [1]: 30
};
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Aheight
Baddress
Cweight
Dage
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Trying to omit the required property name.
Using a property name that conflicts with the interface.
3fill in blank
hard

Fix the error by completing the code to match the interface using duck typing.

Typescript
interface Logger {
  log(message: string): void;
}

const consoleLogger: Logger = {
  [1](msg: string) {
    console.log(msg);
  }
};
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Aprint
Boutput
Clog
Dwrite
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using a different method name like 'print' or 'write' causes a type error.
4fill in blank
hard

Fill both blanks to create a function that accepts any object with a 'speak' method and calls it.

Typescript
function makeSpeak(obj: { [1](): void }) {
  obj.[2]();
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Aspeak
Btalk
Csay
Dshout
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using different method names in the parameter and call causes errors.
5fill in blank
hard

Fill all three blanks to create a duck-typed object with a method and an extra property.

Typescript
interface Animal {
  [1](): void;
}

const cat: Animal = {
  [2]() {
    console.log('Meow');
  },
  [3]: 'black'
};
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
AmakeSound
Ccolor
Dsize
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using a method name different from the interface.
Using an extra property name not intended for this example.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What does duck typing mean in TypeScript?
easy
A. Only objects created from the same class are compatible.
B. If an object has the required properties or methods, it is accepted regardless of its explicit type.
C. TypeScript requires explicit class inheritance to match types.
D. TypeScript checks the runtime type of objects strictly.

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand duck typing concept

    Duck typing means an object is accepted if it has the needed properties or methods, regardless of its declared type.
  2. Step 2: Compare with other options

    The other options describe strict or class-based typing, which is not how TypeScript works.
  3. Final Answer:

    If an object has the required properties or methods, it is accepted regardless of its explicit type. -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Duck typing = structural compatibility [OK]
Hint: Focus on properties, not explicit types, for duck typing [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Thinking TypeScript requires class inheritance
  • Confusing runtime type checks with compile-time checks
  • Assuming exact type names must match
2. Which of the following is a correct TypeScript syntax to define a type that matches any object with a name string property and a quack() method returning void?
easy
A. type Duck = { name: string; quack: () => void; };
B. interface Duck { name: string; quack: void; }
C. type Duck = { name: string; quack(): string; };
D. interface Duck { name: string; quack: () => string; }

Solution

  1. Step 1: Check property and method types

    The name property must be a string, and quack must be a method returning void.
  2. Step 2: Validate each option

    type Duck = { name: string; quack: () => void; }; correctly defines quack as a function returning void. The other options have incorrect method signatures or return types.
  3. Final Answer:

    type Duck = { name: string; quack: () => void; }; -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Correct method signature = type Duck = { name: string; quack: () => void; }; [OK]
Hint: Method type must be a function signature with correct return type [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using method return type as property type
  • Confusing void and string return types
  • Incorrect interface method syntax
3. What will be the output of this TypeScript code?
interface Duck { name: string; quack: () => void; }

function makeItQuack(duck: Duck) {
  duck.quack();
}

const obj = { name: 'Daffy', quack: () => console.log('Quack!'), swim: () => console.log('Swim') };
makeItQuack(obj);
medium
A. No output
B. Swim
C. Error: obj does not match Duck interface
D. Quack!

Solution

  1. Step 1: Check if obj matches Duck interface

    obj has name (string) and quack (function returning void), so it matches by duck typing.
  2. Step 2: Call makeItQuack with obj

    Calling duck.quack() runs console.log('Quack!'), printing "Quack!".
  3. Final Answer:

    Quack! -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Duck typing allows extra properties, output = Quack! [OK]
Hint: Extra properties don't block duck typing; focus on required ones [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Thinking extra properties cause errors
  • Expecting 'Swim' output instead of 'Quack!'
  • Assuming runtime type errors
4. Identify the error in this TypeScript code using duck typing:
interface Duck { name: string; quack: () => void; }

const notADuck = { name: 'Donald' };

function makeItQuack(duck: Duck) {
  duck.quack();
}

makeItQuack(notADuck);
medium
A. notADuck is missing the quack method required by Duck interface.
B. The name property should be a number, not a string.
C. makeItQuack should accept any object without type restrictions.
D. There is no error; code runs fine.

Solution

  1. Step 1: Check properties of notADuck

    notADuck has name but lacks quack method required by Duck interface.
  2. Step 2: Understand TypeScript type checking

    TypeScript will report an error because notADuck does not satisfy the Duck type.
  3. Final Answer:

    notADuck is missing the quack method required by Duck interface. -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Missing required method = Type error [OK]
Hint: Check all required properties/methods exist for the type [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Ignoring missing methods in objects
  • Assuming extra properties cause errors
  • Thinking TypeScript allows missing required members
5. Given this code, which object will TypeScript accept as a valid Duck type?
interface Duck { name: string; quack: () => void; }

const a = { name: 'Daisy', quack: () => console.log('Quack!') };
const b = { name: 'Goose', quack: 'loud' };
const c = { name: 'Swan', quack: () => 'quack' };
const d = { name: 'Mallard' };

function testDuck(duck: Duck) { duck.quack(); }

Which call to testDuck will NOT cause a TypeScript error?
hard
A. testDuck(c);
B. testDuck(b);
C. testDuck(a);
D. testDuck(d);

Solution

  1. Step 1: Check each object's quack property type

    a.quack is a function returning void (correct). b.quack is a string (wrong). c.quack is a function returning string (wrong return type). d.quack is missing (wrong).
  2. Step 2: Determine which matches Duck interface

    Only object a matches the Duck interface exactly.
  3. Final Answer:

    testDuck(a); -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Correct method signature only in a [OK]
Hint: Method must be function returning void to match Duck [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Accepting string or wrong return type as method
  • Ignoring missing methods
  • Confusing method return types
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard